Why does the Bible teach that God "repents" (Genesis 6:6, Exodus 32:14) if He is omniscient and never makes mistakes? Why Does the Bible Teach That God “Repents”? I. Overview of the Question Scripture presents certain passages where God appears to “repent” or “relent,” such as Genesis 6:6 and Exodus 32:14. This raises a concern: how can the all-knowing and perfect God ever regret a decision or change His mind? The underlying tension involves two core biblical truths: (1) God is omniscient and never errs, and (2) the Bible uses language describing God’s responses in a way that resonates with human understanding. Examining the Hebrew words, the immediate contexts, and the whole of Scripture clarifies what is meant by “God repenting,” while affirming God’s unchanging nature and omniscience. II. Key Scripture Passages 1. Genesis 6:6: “And the LORD regretted that He had made man on the earth, and He was grieved in His heart.” 2. Exodus 32:14: “So the LORD relented from the calamity He had threatened to bring on His people.” Other relevant verses: • Numbers 23:19: “God is not man, that He should lie, or a son of man, that He should change His mind. Does He speak and not act? Does He promise and not fulfill?” • 1 Samuel 15:29: “Moreover, the Glory of Israel does not lie or change His mind, for He is not a man, that He should change His mind.” • James 1:17: “…the Father of the heavenly lights, with whom there is no change or shifting shadow.” At first glance, there may seem to be a contradiction: certain passages say God changes His mind, while others insist that God cannot change. A closer look at language, context, and the overall biblical narrative resolves this apparent difficulty. III. Understanding the Original Terms In the passages typically translated “God repented” or “God relented,” the primary Hebrew verb is נָחַם (nacham). This word has a range of nuances depending on the context: • Consolation or Sorrow: It can express deep sorrow or grief (e.g., God’s sorrow over humankind’s wickedness in Genesis 6:6). • Change in Course of Action: It can also mean a shift in outward action or declaration, often resulting from a covenantal or relational response (e.g., God not bringing judgment when people repent). • Anthropomorphic Description: Scripture routinely uses human language to describe divine attributes, allowing us to relate to God’s actions more personally. Recognizing these nuances is crucial. The biblical authors employed human terms to depict God in ways humans can grasp, underscoring His genuine involvement in human affairs without compromising His omniscience or unchanging character. IV. God’s Omniscience and Immutability A. God’s Perfect Knowledge The Bible repeatedly affirms that God knows all things—past, present, and future (Isaiah 46:10; Psalm 139:4). His knowledge cannot be increased, nor can He be taken by surprise. Nothing humans do can force God into a new perspective that He did not already hold. Consequently, the term “repent” cannot imply that God learns something new or realizes a mistake. B. God’s Unchanging Nature Scripture also reveals an immutable God whose essence and character do not alter (Malachi 3:6, “I the LORD do not change…”). This immutability is central to the biblical portrayal of God. He is steadfast in His holiness, love, and justice. He does not shift like human beings, who vacillate or second-guess. Understanding “repentance” in these passages must align with God’s unwavering perfection. V. Anthropopathic and Relational Language A. Anthropopathism in Biblical Writings Anthropopathism refers to the attribution of human emotions or feelings to God, just as anthropomorphism attributes human physical features (like God’s “hands,” “eyes,” or “arm”). The Bible uses such figures of speech to present God’s actions in a way people can understand and relate to. B. Relational Disclosures When Scripture says God “repents,” it speaks of God’s moral response to human conduct in covenantal contexts. God interacts in real time with human affairs. This does not change His eternal plan or foreknowledge; rather, it expresses that He indeed engages with people dynamically. VI. Specific Contexts Where God “Repents” A. Genesis 6:6—God’s Grief over Wickedness 1. Context of Increasing Evil: Humanity’s corruption (Genesis 6:5) implies moral depravity so vast that the text describes God’s deep sorrow. 2. God’s Sorrowful Regret: God’s “regret” (nacham) highlights His holy reaction to human rebellion. Such language underscores His grief but does not suggest He was unprepared or mistaken in creating humankind. 3. Outworking of Righteous Judgment: The Flood narrative that follows is God’s just response to widespread sin, yet Noah’s family is spared to preserve His redemptive plan (Genesis 6:8). B. Exodus 32:14—God “Relenting” after Moses’ Intercession 1. Context: Israel’s Idolatry with the Golden Calf: After receiving the law, Israel quickly turned to idol worship. 2. Moses’ Intercessory Prayer: Moses pleaded with God not to destroy the people (Exodus 32:11–13). 3. God’s Covenant Faithfulness: God “relented” from the threatened judgment (Exodus 32:14), underscoring His willingness to respond to intercessory prayer within the covenant. This event reveals God’s mercy and consistency with His promise to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. It does not indicate a flaw in God’s plan but shows how God’s divine purposes involve genuine relational exchange with His people. VII. Harmonizing with the Totality of Scripture 1. No Contradiction: The passages describing God “repenting” do not contradict affirmations of His immutability. They reveal God’s engagement with humanity using language familiar to human experience. 2. God’s Eternal Plan: Though Scripture shows God responding to unfolding events, He does so consistently with His eternal purposes (Ephesians 1:9–11). 3. Moral Seriousness: The mention of God’s “repentance” highlights the gravity of sin and the significance of communion with the divine. These passages display the cost of human rebellion and the profound sincerity with which God holds mankind accountable. VIII. Practical Insights and Reflection 1. God’s Commitment to Relationship: References to God relenting or repenting emphasize that He does not deal with humanity in a cold, detached manner. Instead, He is intimately aware of human actions and extends grace. 2. Call to Humility: Realizing that God’s “change of mind” language underscores His righteous response to sin should lead to awe and humility. He is personal and involved, even while being all-knowing and perfect. 3. Confidence in God’s Character: Believers find assurance in God’s unchanging attributes. While He engages dynamically in human history, His nature—holy, loving, just—remains constant. IX. Conclusion God’s “repentance” in Scripture signifies neither a lack of foresight nor an error. Instead, it employs human language to convey His deep sorrow over sin, His readiness to respond to intercession, and His unwavering commitment to holy love and righteousness. Recognizing the Hebrew term nacham, its range of meaning, and the consistency of all Scripture prevents misunderstanding. “Repentance” passages highlight God’s compassionate involvement in the human story. They do not imply that He ever truly changes His mind in the way humans do—reacting from ignorance or error. Rather, they demonstrate that the God of the Bible, perfect in knowledge and power, enters genuinely into relationship with humankind, expressing mercy and justice in the unfolding of His eternal plan. |
    |