The account of the two harlots who came before King Solomon is a profound biblical example of arbitration and divine wisdom. This narrative is found in 1 Kings 3:16-28 and serves as a testament to Solomon's God-given discernment and the role of arbitration in resolving disputes.

Context and Setting

The account unfolds shortly after Solomon ascends to the throne of Israel, succeeding his father, King David. Solomon, known for his request for wisdom from God, is granted unparalleled understanding and discernment. This particular incident is one of the first demonstrations of his wisdom in action, showcasing his ability to arbitrate complex and emotionally charged disputes.

The Dispute

Two women, described as harlots, come before King Solomon with a grave matter. They lived in the same house and each had given birth to a son. One night, one of the infants tragically died. The mother of the deceased child allegedly switched her dead son with the living son of the other woman while she slept. Upon waking, the second woman discovered the dead child beside her and realized it was not her own. The two women brought their case before Solomon, each claiming to be the mother of the living child.

Solomon's Arbitration

Faced with a situation lacking witnesses or evidence, Solomon's approach to arbitration was both unconventional and insightful. He proposed to cut the living child in two, giving half to each woman. This shocking suggestion was a test to reveal the true maternal bond. The real mother, driven by love and compassion, immediately pleaded for the child's life to be spared, offering to relinquish her claim so that the child could live. The other woman, however, agreed to the division, revealing her lack of maternal attachment.

Resolution and Wisdom

Solomon's strategy effectively exposed the true mother, who was willing to sacrifice her claim to save her child. Recognizing her genuine love, Solomon awarded her custody of the living child. This decision not only resolved the dispute but also demonstrated Solomon's profound wisdom, as noted in 1 Kings 3:28: "When all Israel heard of the judgment the king had rendered, they stood in awe of Solomon, because they saw that the wisdom of God was in him to administer justice."

Theological and Moral Implications

This narrative highlights several key themes in biblical arbitration. Firstly, it underscores the importance of wisdom and discernment in leadership, particularly in resolving disputes where evidence is lacking. Solomon's decision reflects a deep understanding of human nature and the power of love as a revealing force.

Secondly, the account illustrates the biblical principle that true justice is rooted in righteousness and compassion. Solomon's arbitration was not merely about legal correctness but about uncovering truth and preserving life.

Lastly, the account serves as a reminder of the divine source of wisdom. Solomon's ability to arbitrate effectively was a direct result of his prayerful request for understanding, as seen earlier in 1 Kings 3:9: "Give Your servant, therefore, an understanding heart to judge Your people and to discern between good and evil."

In conclusion, the arbitration of the two harlots before King Solomon remains a timeless example of wise and just leadership, demonstrating the profound impact of divine wisdom in human affairs.1 Kings 3:16-28
Then came there two women, that were harlots, to the king, and stood before him.
Nave's Topical Index

Arbitration: Dictionary and Thesaurus | Clyx.com

Bible Concordance • Bible Dictionary • Bible Encyclopedia • Topical Bible • Bible Thesuarus