Topical Encyclopedia Privacy in decision-making is a concept that, while not explicitly named in the Bible, is implicitly supported through various scriptural principles and narratives. The Bible provides numerous examples where individuals sought solitude or privacy to make significant decisions, reflecting the importance of personal reflection and divine guidance in the decision-making process.Biblical Examples and Principles 1. Jesus’ Solitude for Prayer and Decision-Making: One of the most prominent examples of seeking privacy for decision-making is found in the life of Jesus Christ. Before choosing His twelve apostles, Jesus spent the entire night in prayer, seeking solitude to commune with the Father. Luke 6:12-13 states, "In those days, Jesus went out to the mountain to pray, and He spent the night in prayer to God. When daylight came, He called His disciples to Him and chose twelve of them, whom He also designated as apostles." This passage highlights the importance of withdrawing from the crowd to seek divine guidance in making critical decisions. 2. Moses and the Tent of Meeting: In the Old Testament, Moses frequently sought privacy to communicate with God. Exodus 33:7 describes how Moses would pitch a tent outside the camp, called the Tent of Meeting, where he would speak with God. "Now Moses used to take a tent and pitch it outside the camp some distance away, calling it the tent of meeting. Anyone inquiring of the LORD would go to the tent of meeting outside the camp." This practice underscores the value of setting aside a private space for seeking God's will and making decisions. 3. Nehemiah’s Private Reflection: Nehemiah provides another example of privacy in decision-making. Before taking action to rebuild the walls of Jerusalem, Nehemiah spent time in private prayer and fasting. Nehemiah 1:4 records, "When I heard these words, I sat down and wept. I mourned for days, fasting and praying before the God of heaven." His private reflection and prayer were crucial in preparing him for the task ahead. 4. Daniel’s Private Prayers: Daniel is known for his commitment to private prayer, even when it was outlawed. Daniel 6:10 states, "Now when Daniel learned that the document had been signed, he went into his house, where the windows of his upper room opened toward Jerusalem, and three times a day he got down on his knees, prayed, and gave thanks to his God, just as he had done before." Daniel’s private prayers were integral to his decision-making and his steadfastness in faith. Theological Implications The practice of seeking privacy in decision-making is deeply rooted in the biblical understanding of the relationship between God and individuals. It reflects a recognition of the need for divine wisdom and guidance, as well as the importance of personal reflection and discernment. Proverbs 3:5-6 advises, "Trust in the LORD with all your heart, and lean not on your own understanding; in all your ways acknowledge Him, and He will make your paths straight." This passage encourages believers to seek God’s direction in their decisions, often necessitating a private and personal approach. Practical Applications For believers today, the biblical examples of privacy in decision-making serve as a model for incorporating solitude and prayer into their own decision-making processes. By setting aside time for private reflection and seeking God’s guidance, individuals can align their decisions with biblical principles and ensure that their choices are informed by faith and wisdom. Subtopics Prisons used for Confining: Condemned Persons Till Executed Prisons used for Confining: Debtors Till They Paid Prisons used for Confining: Enemies Taken Captive Prisons used for Confining: Persons Accused of Crimes Prisons used for Confining: Persons Accused of Heresy Prisons used for Confining: Persons Under the King's Displeasure Prisons used for Confining: Suspected Persons Prisons were Under the Care of a Keeper Prisons: Bondage to Sin and Satan Prisons: Confinement In, Considered a Severe Punishment Prisons: Confinement In, often Awarded As a Punishment Prisons: Keepers of Often Used Severity Prisons: Keepers of Put to Death If Prisoners Escaped Prisons: Keepers of Responsible for the Prisoners Prisons: Keepers of Sometimes Acted Kindly Prisons: Keepers of Sometimes Entrusted the Care of the Prison To Prisons: Keepers of Strictly Guarded the Doors Prisons: Kinds of, Mentioned: Common Prisons: Kinds of, Mentioned: State Prisons: Magistrates had Power to Commit To Prisons: Magistrates had Power to Release From Prisons: Persons Confined in Clothed in Prison Dress Prisons: Persons Confined in Fed on Bread and Water Prisons: Persons Confined in Might Have Their Condition Ameliorated by the King Prisons: Persons Confined in Often Bound With Fetters Prisons: Persons Confined in Often Chained to Two Soldiers Prisons: Persons Confined in Often Executed In Prisons: Persons Confined in Often Fastened in Stocks Prisons: Persons Confined in Often Kept to Hard Labour Prisons: Persons Confined in Often Placed in Dungeons Prisons: Persons Confined in Often Subjected to Extreme Suffering Prisons: Persons Confined in Said to be in Hold Prisons: Persons Confined in Said to be in Ward Prisons: Persons Confined in Sometimes Allowed to be Visited by Their Friends Prisons: Places Used as Court of the King's House Prisons: Places Used as House of the Captain of the Guard Prisons: Places Used as House of the King's Scribe Prisons: Places Used as Prisoner's own House, where he Was Kept Bound to a Soldier Prisons: The King had Power to Commit To Prisons: The King had Power to Release From Related Terms |