Strong's Greek: 3210 -- (Not Used)zzz

Lexical Summary

(Not Used): (Not Used)

(Not Used)
Part of Speech:
Transliteration: (Not Used)
(Not Used)

Topical Lexicon

Numerical context within Strong’s Concordance

Strong’s number 3210 is one of several catalog entries that remain vacant in the Greek section of James Strong’s system. The absence reflects nothing defective in Scripture itself but simply the editorial process used when the numbers were assigned in 1890. During compilation, Strong reserved blocks for words found in certain lexicons or manuscripts then available to him. Some of those anticipated entries were later judged to be duplicates, textual variants best placed under another headword, or readings unsupported by the critical Greek text adopted for the concordance. When the dust settled, a handful of numbers—including 3210—were left unused so that existing references would not have to be renumbered.

Absence from the Greek New Testament

Because 3210 never attached to an actual lemma, there are no occurrences to chart in the canonical Greek New Testament. This feature reminds the student that lexical numbering systems are study aids, not inspired components of the biblical text. The believer’s confidence lies in the wording God breathed out, not in the modern scaffolding that scholars erect to study that wording. As the Berean Standard Bible states, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for instruction, for conviction, for correction, and for training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16).

Connection with the Septuagint and Classical Greek

Several other vacant Strong’s numbers later proved to coincide with words found only in the Septuagint or in classical sources. While 3210 is not presently linked to any specific term, its lacuna reminds researchers to consult multiple tools—critical editions of the Septuagint, papyri, inscriptions, and the Apostolic Fathers—before drawing conclusions about vocabulary frequency in the biblical era. Gaps such as these encourage a broader investigation into the linguistic world that surrounded the New Testament writers.

Textual and translation considerations

Every Bible translation must decide how to handle variant readings and marginal notes in the manuscript tradition. A “missing” Strong’s number highlights the care required when assessing whether a word truly belongs to the original text. Jesus assured His hearers, “Until heaven and earth pass away, not a single jot, not a stroke of a pen, will disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished” (Matthew 5:18). The integrity of Scripture is therefore measured by the preservation of its words, not by modern reference numbers.

Doctrinal insights from the numbering gap

1. Preservation: The fact that scholars can identify unused numbers underscores how meticulously the Greek text has been sifted and preserved.
2. Sufficiency: Even without an entry at 3210, the New Testament remains complete. No doctrine hangs on an absent lexeme because “His divine power has given us everything we need for life and godliness” (2 Peter 1:3).
3. Humility in scholarship: Vacant slots caution interpreters against overconfidence in secondary tools and invite renewed reliance on the primary text.

Practical implications for teaching and preaching

• Illustrating reliability: A pastor may point to 3210 when explaining how concordances were built, reassuring listeners that recognized gaps actually showcase scholarly transparency.
• Encouraging discernment: Bible students learn to verify a word’s presence in the Greek text rather than depending solely on a numbering system.
• Highlighting providence: Even editorial oversights serve the learner by prompting deeper exploration of original-language resources.

Historical reception among scholars and commentators

Early twentieth-century commentators rarely mention the vacant numbers, but modern lexicographers note them when producing digital databases. Software packages often skip directly from 3209 to 3211, preserving Strong’s original sequence so that older print commentaries remain compatible with electronic tools. This continuity reflects a broader commitment within conservative scholarship to respect the labors of earlier generations while refining details as additional evidence comes to light.

Conclusion

The empty slot at Strong’s Greek 3210 offers a quiet lesson in textual fidelity. It stands as a reminder that Scripture itself is perfect, even though human reference works are sometimes incomplete. Rather than undermining confidence, the numbering gap underscores the rigorous care with which God’s Word has been transmitted and studied—encouraging believers to handle the text “accurately,” as instructed in 2 Timothy 2:15.

Links

Interlinear Greek • Interlinear Hebrew • Strong's Numbers • Englishman's Greek Concordance • Englishman's Hebrew Concordance • Parallel Texts