Lexical Summary Stóikos: Stoic Original Word: Στωϊκός Strong's Exhaustive Concordance a StoicFrom stoa; a "Stoic" (as occupying a particular porch in Athens), i.e. Adherent of a certin philosophy -- Stoick. see GREEK stoa NAS Exhaustive Concordance Word Originvariant reading for Stoikos, q.v. NASB Translation Stoic (1). Thayer's Greek Lexicon STRONGS NT 4770: Στοϊκός[Στοϊκός, so Lachmann Tdf. for Στωϊκός, which see] STRONGS NT 4770: ΣτωϊκόςΣτωϊκός ((WH Στωϊκός), L T Στοϊκός, see Tdf.s note on Acts as below; WH's Appendix, p. 152), Στωικη, Στωικον, Stoic, pertaining to the Stole philosophy, the author of which, Zeno of Citium, taught at Athens in the portico called ἡ ποικίλη στοά: οἱ Στωικοι φιλοσοφοι, Acts 17:18. (((Diogenes Laërtius 7, 5; others)) Originating in Athens around 300 BC, Stoicism was founded by Zeno of Citium and developed by thinkers such as Cleanthes and Chrysippus. Meeting under the painted porch (stoa poikilē), these philosophers taught that the universe is permeated by an impersonal rational principle (logos), that virtue alone brings happiness, and that emotions should be tamed through reason. By the first century AD Stoicism had spread throughout the Greco-Roman world, influencing civic ethics, rhetoric, and even Roman law through figures like Seneca and Marcus Aurelius. Its moral seriousness and emphasis on self-control gained admiration, yet its pantheistic view of divinity and confidence in autonomous human reason stood at odds with biblical revelation. Occurrence in Scripture The term occurs once, in Acts 17:18, describing a group that confronted Paul in Athens: “Some Epicurean and Stoic philosophers also began to debate with him. Some of them asked, ‘What is this babbler trying to say?’”. Luke’s single reference is sufficient to highlight the gospel’s engagement with the leading philosophies of the age. Paul’s engagement on the Areopagus Standing before an audience shaped by Stoic ethics and cosmology, Paul affirmed truths that would resonate with them—God’s nearness and human accountability—while decisively correcting their errors: • God is personal and transcendent, not an impersonal fire permeating matter (Acts 17:24). Using concepts familiar to Stoics (“‘For in Him we live and move and have our being,’” Acts 17:28), Paul bridged to the gospel yet maintained the exclusive claim of Jesus Christ as risen Lord. Worldview contrasts 1. View of God: Stoicism—impersonal pantheism; Scripture—personal, holy Creator (Romans 1:25). Related biblical teaching on philosophy Paul later warns, “See to it that no one takes you captive through philosophy and empty deception, according to human tradition … rather than Christ” (Colossians 2:8). While not naming Stoicism, the verse addresses any system that elevates human speculation over divine revelation. Likewise, “Where is the philosopher of this age? Has not God made foolish the wisdom of the world?” (1 Corinthians 1:20) situates the cross as God’s answer to all competing worldviews. Legacy and early Christian interaction Early apologists such as Justin Martyr and Athenagoras, aware of Stoic terminology, appealed to common moral concerns yet emphasized the insufficiency of Stoic doctrine to secure salvation. Elements of Stoic language (logos, natural law) were appropriated, but always subordinated to biblical truth. The church fathers’ nuanced engagement models a discerning yet uncompromising witness. Practical ministry applications • Cultural literacy: Understanding prevailing philosophies equips believers to communicate biblical truth effectively, following Paul’s pattern in Athens. Summary Strong’s Greek 4770 highlights a moment when apostolic preaching met intellectual elites. Scripture neither ignores nor idolizes human philosophy; it evaluates every system by the revelation of the crucified and risen Christ. The single mention of the Stoics calls the church to a similarly confident engagement with the thought currents of each age, proclaiming the true Logos who alone brings saving knowledge of God. |
    |