2325. chub
Lexical Summary
chub: To hide, to withdraw, to cover

Original Word: חוּב
Part of Speech: Verb
Transliteration: chuwb
Pronunciation: khoob
Phonetic Spelling: (khoob)
KJV: make endanger
NASB: forfeit
Word Origin: [a primitive root]

1. (properly) perhaps to tie
2. (figuratively, reflexively) to owe
3. (by implication) to forfeit

Strong's Exhaustive Concordance
endanger

Also chayab {khaw-yab'}; a primitive root; properly, perhaps to tie, i.e. (figuratively and reflexively) to owe, or (by implication) to forfeit -- make endanger.

NAS Exhaustive Concordance
Word Origin
a prim. root
Definition
to be guilty
NASB Translation
forfeit (1).

Brown-Driver-Briggs
[חוּב] verb be guilty (Late Hebrew id., be under obligation, guilty; Aramaic , חוּב, be defeated, guilty; Arabic be disappointed, fail; — Arabic , sin, is loan-word according to Bev Daniel 1:10); —

Qal not in MT; but read perhaps חַבְתִּי (for סַבֹּתִי) 1 Samuel 22:22 I am guilty, so ᵑ6 Th We Dr.

Pi`el Perfect inculpate וְחִיַּבְתֶּם אתרֿאֹשִׁי לַמֶּ֑לֶךְ consecutive Daniel 1:10 and inculpate my head with the king.

Topical Lexicon
Scriptural Context

The verb חוּב appears once in the Hebrew canon, Daniel 1:10, within the narrative of Judean exiles in the Babylonian court. Ashpenaz, the chief official, has been ordered to nourish Daniel and his companions with royal delicacies, yet he hesitates to grant their request for a different diet lest they “endanger” (חוּב) his head before Nebuchadnezzar. In the Berean Standard Bible the verse reads: “but he said to Daniel, ‘I fear my lord the king, who has assigned your food and drink. For why should he see your faces looking more haggard than the young men who are your age? Then you would endanger my head with the king.’ ” The word pictures the threat of personal liability—an obligation that could cost the official his life if the king is displeased.

Liability and Accountability before Human Authority

The single usage underscores a critical principle: those charged with stewardship are accountable for the outcomes of their decisions. In the Ancient Near East, a royal servant’s “head” was literally at stake; negligence or defiance could bring capital punishment. By invoking חוּב, Ashpenaz voices the genuine peril of being found guilty in the eyes of a supreme authority. Scripture consistently affirms that earthly leaders answer to higher powers (Romans 13:1–4) and that subordinates in turn answer to those leaders. Daniel’s situation illustrates how godly convictions intersect with structures of delegated authority.

Faithful Conviction versus Fear of Man

Although חוּב focuses on human liability, the wider narrative highlights a higher accountability to God. Daniel balances respect for Ashpenaz’s legitimate concern with unwavering fidelity to divine law. His proposed ten-day test (Daniel 1:12–14) protects the official from blame while leaving room for God’s intervention. Believers are thereby reminded that wise, gracious negotiation can honor both heavenly and earthly obligations, aligning with the apostolic exhortation to “keep a clear conscience before God and men” (Acts 24:16).

Historical Background

Nebuchadnezzar’s policy of assimilating gifted captives aimed to secure loyalty and cultural homogenization. Refusal of royal food risked appearing rebellious, potentially jeopardizing the official’s standing. The Persian and later Hellenistic courts retained similar protocols whereby attendants bore immediate responsibility for a king’s welfare and satisfaction. Thus חוּב captures not merely emotional unease but a codified legal peril embedded in imperial bureaucracy.

Broader Biblical Themes

1. Stewardship: From Joseph in Egypt (Genesis 39:4–6) to Paul’s teaching on eldership (Titus 1:7), Scripture delineates spheres of responsibility and warns of culpability for mismanagement.
2. Innocent Suffering: Ashpenaz anticipates punishment despite good intentions, echoing narratives where righteous individuals face unjust blame (e.g., Mordecai in Esther 2:21–23).
3. Substitute Liability: The concept of bearing another’s guilt anticipates the ultimate substitutionary work of Christ, who voluntarily accepted mankind’s culpability (2 Corinthians 5:21).

Ministry Implications

• Leaders and servants alike must weigh decisions that could “incur guilt” upon themselves or others, seeking actions that satisfy both moral conviction and institutional duty.
• Believers are called to cultivate creative solutions—such as Daniel’s dietary test—that uphold biblical standards without needlessly triggering hostility.
• The narrative encourages prayerful trust that God honors fidelity, resolving potential liabilities in ways beyond human control, as evidenced by Daniel’s eventual vindication (Daniel 1:15–20).

Summary

Though appearing only once, חוּב provides a vivid window into ancient accountability, the tension between divine obedience and human authority, and God’s providential care for those who resolve to remain undefiled.

Forms and Transliterations
וְחִיַּבְתֶּ֥ם וחיבתם vechiyavTem wə·ḥî·yaḇ·tem wəḥîyaḇtem
Links
Interlinear GreekInterlinear HebrewStrong's NumbersEnglishman's Greek ConcordanceEnglishman's Hebrew ConcordanceParallel Texts
Englishman's Concordance
Daniel 1:10
HEB: אֲשֶׁ֣ר כְּגִֽילְכֶ֔ם וְחִיַּבְתֶּ֥ם אֶת־ רֹאשִׁ֖י
NAS: are your own age? Then you would make me forfeit my head
KJV: which [are] of your sort? then shall ye make [me] endanger my head
INT: who exceedingly endanger my head to the king

1 Occurrence

Strong's Hebrew 2325
1 Occurrence


wə·ḥî·yaḇ·tem — 1 Occ.

2324
Top of Page
Top of Page