1 Chronicles 26:28: temple treasures?
What is the significance of 1 Chronicles 26:28 in the context of temple treasures?

Text

“Everything dedicated by Samuel the seer and by Saul son of Kish, Abner son of Ner, and Joab son of Zeruiah—everything that had been dedicated was under the care of Shelomith and his relatives.” (1 Chronicles 26:28)


Immediate Literary Setting

Chapters 23–27 catalog David’s re-organization of Levitical service. Chapter 26 divides into (1) gatekeepers (vv. 1–19) and (2) treasurers/officials (vv. 20–32). Verse 28 functions as the hinge, explaining why Shelomith’s clan required oversight: the accumulation of long-standing votive gifts demanded trustworthy stewardship.


Historical Stream of Dedication

• Samuel (1 Samuel 7:9, 17) inaugurated national altars.

• Saul’s reign generated spoils (1 Samuel 14:48).

• Abner and Joab, as commanders, gathered war booty (2 Samuel 8:10–12).

By chronicling pre-Davidic and pre-temple dedications, the author shows a continuous sacred fund stretching from the judges through the united monarchy into Solomon’s temple era (cf. 1 Chron 22:14).


Nature of the Treasures

Hebrew ḥădāšîm = “dedicated things,” a technical term for items devoted to YHWH: metals (Numbers 31:50), armor, exotic woods, aromatic resins, and precious stones (1 Chron 29:2). Much of it derived from the kherem principle—spoils irrevocably devoted to God (Joshua 6:19).


Shelomith and Levitical Accountability

Shelomith, a Kohathite descendant of Izhar (26:25–26), oversaw “all the treasuries of what had been dedicated” (v. 26). Kohathites had earlier carried the most sacred tabernacle articles (Numbers 4:4–15). Their selection preserves priestly continuity while ensuring financial transparency (cf. 2 Kings 12:15).


Theology of Dedication

1. Ownership—“The earth is the LORD’s” (Psalm 24:1).

2. First-fruits—God receives the choicest portion (Proverbs 3:9).

3. Holiness transfer—objects move from common to sacred status (Leviticus 27:28).

4. Anticipatory worship—treasures were stockpiled not for David’s benefit but for a future, permanent house of God (1 Chron 28:10–12).


Contribution to Temple Construction

By Solomon’s accession “the treasuries of the house of the LORD” were already vast (2 Chron 5:1). Verse 28 documents how that reservoir formed, rebutting claims that Solomon’s temple wealth was exaggerated. Totals in 1 Chron 29 (≈110 metric tons gold; ≈260 metric tons silver) fit ANE tribute scales (e.g., Thutmose III’s Karnak Annals list 11 tons gold in a single campaign).


Continuity from Tabernacle to Temple

The Chronicler highlights an unbroken liturgical pipeline: Mosaic tabernacle → Shiloh under Samuel → Gibeon under David → Zion under Solomon. The treasures mirror God’s dwelling progress amid His people, climaxing in the incarnate “temple” (John 2:19–21).


Archaeological Corroboration

• The Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (7th c. BC) confirm pre-exilic priestly treasuries and quote Numbers 6:24-26 verbatim, illustrating textual stability.

• The Copper Scroll (Qumran, 3Q15) lists gold & silver caches “in the House of the Column”—evidence that massive sacred treasuries were historically plausible.

• Tel Dan Stele (9th c. BC) references “House of David,” anchoring Davidic chronology assumed by the Chronicler.

• Bullae bearing names of priestly families (e.g., “Gemaryahu son of Shaphan”) show a bureaucratic infrastructure capable of managing valuables.


Christological Foreshadowing

The dedicated objects prefigure the greater consecration accomplished by Christ who “entered the greater and more perfect tabernacle… by His own blood” (Hebrews 9:11-12). Material valuables illustrate the true, incorruptible inheritance secured through the risen Messiah (1 Peter 1:3-5).


Ethical and Devotional Implications

• Stewardship—Believers, like Shelomith, manage resources for God’s glory (1 Corinthians 4:2).

• Generational faithfulness—Samuel to Shelomith spans over a century, showing that what we give today blesses worshipers yet unborn (Psalm 102:18).

• Unity of purpose—Dedications from both rejected (Saul) and chosen (David) dynasties reside side-by-side, exemplifying God’s ability to repurpose all things for His worship.


Summary

1 Chronicles 26:28 functions as a ledger entry tethering Israel’s sacred economy from the era of the judges to the impending first temple. It authenticates the Chronicler’s historical method, illustrates covenantal stewardship, anticipates the consummate temple in Christ, and provides a model for accountable, worship-oriented use of material resources.

How does 1 Chronicles 26:28 encourage us to honor God with our resources?
Top of Page
Top of Page