How does 1 Samuel 28:15 align with biblical prohibitions against necromancy? Passage in Context 1 Samuel 28 records Saul’s desperate visit to the “medium at En-dor” on the eve of his final battle with the Philistines. Verses 6–7 note that the LORD no longer answered Saul “by dreams or Urim or prophets,” so the king sought guidance through a channel God had explicitly outlawed. Verse 15 forms the centerpiece of the narrative: the medium sees “a god coming up out of the earth,” Saul perceives that it is Samuel, and a conversation ensues. The event seems, at first glance, to conflict with clear biblical bans on necromancy. A careful, text-driven study shows instead that it reinforces those prohibitions and showcases God’s sovereignty in judgment. Text of 1 Samuel 28:15 “Then Samuel said to Saul, ‘Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?’ ‘I am deeply distressed,’ Saul replied. ‘The Philistines are waging war against me, and God has turned away from me. He no longer answers me by the prophets or in dreams. So I have called you to tell me what to do.’” Divine Prohibition of Necromancy The Torah repeatedly forbids any attempt to contact the dead. • Leviticus 19:31—“Do not turn to mediums or spiritists.” • Leviticus 20:6—“I will set My face against the person who turns to mediums.” • Deuteronomy 18:10–12—“Let no one be found among you... who consults the dead. For whoever does these things is detestable to the LORD.” • Isaiah 8:19—“Should not a people inquire of their God? Why consult the dead on behalf of the living?” These commands carry the death penalty (Leviticus 20:27) and are rooted in God’s exclusive right to reveal truth (Deuteronomy 29:29). Necromancy is thus never sanctioned; Scripture presents it as rebellion comparable to idolatry. Historical Background: Saul’s Spiritual Decline Early in his reign Saul had “removed the mediums and spiritists from the land” (1 Samuel 28:3). Yet disobedience had become habitual: unlawful sacrifice (13:8–14), rash vows (14:24–46), and partial obedience regarding Amalek (15:1–23). After the Spirit of the LORD departed (16:14), Saul’s life spiraled toward paranoia and violence. God’s silence in chapter 28 was the culmination of long-standing rebellion. Identity of the Figure: Samuel or Demonic Impostor? Three main views appear in Christian tradition: 1. Demonic Impostor—Some argue a deceiving spirit mimicked Samuel. 2. Psychological Illusion—Others suggest the entire scene was deception, with Saul merely imagining Samuel. 3. Genuine Appearance of Samuel—A majority of ancient and Reformation-era commentators see the real Samuel, summoned not by the medium’s power but by God’s sovereign act. Internal clues favor the third view: • The text repeatedly names the figure “Samuel” without qualification (vv. 12, 15, 16). • The prophecy he gives perfectly aligns with Samuel’s prior words (15:28) and is fulfilled exactly in 31:1–6. • The medium screams in surprise (28:12), suggesting the event exceeded her normal occult practice. God alone controls the realm of the dead (Deuteronomy 32:39). He sometimes sends departed saints for His purposes (e.g., Moses and Elijah at the Transfiguration, Matthew 17:3). The raising of Samuel therefore displays divine initiative, not occult efficacy. Exegetical Analysis of Key Terms • “Medium” (Heb. ʾōḇ)—literally “a ritual pit,” later “one who has a familiar spirit.” • “Bring me up” (Heb. ʿālītî)—standard idiom for summoning from Sheol. • “Disturbed” (Heb. rāgaz)—connotes agitation; Samuel protests the improper breach of the divine order. The vocabulary portrays contact with Sheol as tumultuous and unnatural. Samuel’s rebuke confirms that necromancy is an intrusion, not a legitimate channel of revelation. The Role of Yahweh’s Sovereign Permission Scripture often shows God using forbidden acts to pronounce judgment without endorsing those acts (e.g., Balaam’s divination in Numbers 22–24; Judas’s betrayal in Matthew 26:24). In 1 Samuel 28 the LORD allows Samuel’s appearance: • to expose the futility of Saul’s rebellion—“Why ask me, since the LORD has turned from you?” (v. 16). • to seal Saul’s doom—“Tomorrow you and your sons will be with me” (v. 19). • to vindicate Samuel’s earlier prophecies—demonstrating that true revelation remains consistent. Thus the event functions as divine judgment, not permission to engage in necromancy. Consistency with the Law Saul’s action violated the Law; the narrative condemns it on multiple levels: • Narrative Irony—Saul himself had expelled mediums, yet seeks one. • Prophetic Silence—God’s refusal to answer shows broken fellowship. • Outcome—Saul’s death the next day illustrates “the wages of sin is death” (Romans 6:23). The text therefore underscores the Law’s validity by showing its predictive warnings fulfilled. The Unique, Irreproducible Nature of the Event No biblical precedent invites believers to replicate Saul’s séance. The sole other post-mortem appearances (Moses/Elijah; the saints in Matthew 27:52–53) are divine initiatives tied to redemptive history. 1 Samuel 28 remains a one-off judicial sign, not a template for guidance. The Event as Judgment, Not Authorization Samuel’s words offer no comfort, no new strategy, only impending doom. Genuine necromancy—as forbidden by God—seeks power or knowledge apart from Him. Here, the true prophet reiterates God’s condemnation. The story’s atmosphere of terror, desperation, and finality underscores the spiritual peril of occult recourse. Theological Implications for Necromancy Today 1. God alone reveals truth; any alternate channel invites deception (John 14:6; Colossians 2:8). 2. Consulting the dead expresses distrust in God’s sufficiency and is detestable to Him. 3. Even if a real apparition occurs, it serves God’s purposes, not the practitioner’s whims. Christ’s resurrection renders all occult claims obsolete: believers have direct access to the living God through His risen Son and indwelling Spirit (Hebrews 4:16). New Testament Confirmation The New Testament continues the ban on occult practice: • Acts 19:19—new converts burn occult scrolls. • Galatians 5:20—“sorcery” (pharmakeia) listed among works of the flesh. • Revelation 21:8—the “sorcerers” share the lake of fire. The gospel offers liberation from bondage to spirits (Colossians 1:13). Saul’s tragic end serves as a cautionary tale against seeking spiritual shortcuts. Pastoral and Apologetic Applications • Biblical consistency—The event does not contradict the Law but upholds it by negative example. • Spiritual warfare—Necromancy invites demonic influence; the believer stands secure in Christ’s victory (Ephesians 6:10–18). • Evangelistic bridge—Saul’s story highlights the emptiness of occult pursuits and the sufficiency of God’s self-revelation in Scripture and the resurrected Christ. Conclusion 1 Samuel 28:15 aligns with the Bible’s prohibitions against necromancy by portraying Saul’s séance as an act of desperation that God overrides for judgment, not guidance. The passage affirms the Law’s authority, reveals the futility of seeking the dead, and foreshadows humanity’s need for the one true Mediator who conquered death—Jesus Christ, “the same yesterday and today and forever” (Hebrews 13:8). |
    |