How does 1 Samuel 28:22 align with biblical teachings against consulting the dead? Canonical Text and Immediate Context 1 Samuel 28:22,: “Now please listen to your servant and let me set a morsel of bread before you so that you may eat and have the strength to go on your way.” Spoken by the medium of Endor, these words follow Saul’s unlawful request (vv. 7–11) and Samuel’s rebuke from the grave (vv. 15–19). The verse simply records the medium’s offer of food; it nowhere expresses divine approval of necromancy. Descriptive Narrative, Not Prescriptive Endorsement Scripture often records human sin without endorsing it (e.g., Genesis 34; 2 Samuel 11). 1 Samuel 28 is descriptive: it recounts Saul’s disobedience. No command, promise, or commendation authorizes consulting the dead. The entire episode sets up Saul’s final judgment (31:1–6). Mosaic Law’s Explicit Prohibition • Leviticus 19:31—“Do not turn to mediums or familiar spirits.” • Leviticus 20:6, 27—necromancers were to be cut off. • Deuteronomy 18:10–12—such practices are “detestable.” The Torah establishes Yahweh as the only legitimate source of supernatural guidance (Numbers 27:21; Deuteronomy 18:15–22). Saul himself had earlier enforced this law (1 Samuel 28:3) before violating it. God’s Judicial Override, Not Mediumistic Power Whether the apparition was Samuel in person (most likely: the woman shrieks in fear, vv. 12–13, indicating something beyond her craft) or a divine simulation, the text stresses God’s sovereignty: • 1 Samuel 28:15—Samuel: “Why have you disturbed me by bringing me up?” • v. 19—“Tomorrow you and your sons will be with me; the LORD will deliver Israel…” Yahweh—not the medium—permits Samuel’s final prophetic word of judgment. Thus, even if the genuine Samuel appears, the miracle belongs to God, not necromancy. Theological Function: Final Indictment of Saul Saul’s reign began with divine favor (1 Samuel 10), deteriorated through progressive disobedience (13; 15), and ends here with covenant infraction in its most graphic form. Consulting the dead demonstrates that Saul has forfeited covenant relationship; therefore Samuel reiterates the earlier verdict (15:23): “Because you have rejected the word of the LORD, He has rejected you as king.” Intertextual Confirmation • 1 Chron 10:13–14—“Saul died…because he was unfaithful to the LORD…for consulting a medium for guidance.” • Isaiah 8:19–20—seeking the dead instead of God evidences darkness. • Luke 16:29–31—Jesus affirms sufficiency of “Moses and the Prophets,” not post-mortem messages. No passage rescinds the prohibition. Instead, the canon universally condemns necromancy. Archaeological and Cultural Background Ugaritic tablets (KTU 1.6; 1.19) describe Canaanite necromancy rites, confirming that Israel’s neighbors practiced divination by the dead. Ivory plaques from Megiddo (13th c. BC) depict feasting scenes linked to ancestor cults. Against this backdrop, the Torah’s ban is counter-cultural and distinctive, elevating Yahweh’s revelation above occult inquiry. Pastoral and Apologetic Implications Modern séances, Ouija boards, psychic consultations, and “cross-over” television shows replicate ancient necromancy. Studies in behavioral science note heightened anxiety, depression, and occult oppression among participants (cf. journal data: J. Rel. & Health 52.3 [2013]: 759-71). Scripture’s prohibition protects both spiritual fidelity and mental well-being. Christological Fulfillment and Ultimate Contrast Necromancy seeks knowledge from the dead; the gospel offers communion with the risen Christ (Revelation 1:18). By conquering death, Jesus renders occult shortcuts both unnecessary and idolatrous. Believers are commanded to “ask God, who gives generously” (James 1:5), and to rely on the Spirit of truth (John 16:13). Conclusion 1 Samuel 28:22 in no way legitimizes speaking with the dead. It is a narrative detail within a passage that condemns Saul’s violation of clear Mosaic law, rehearses God’s sovereignty over life and death, and foreshadows the catastrophic consequences of occult involvement. The canonical witness, manuscript evidence, historical context, and Christ’s resurrection converge to affirm that consulting the dead is disobedience, while God alone is the source of truth and guidance. |
    |