How does 1 Samuel 28:8 align with biblical teachings against necromancy? Text of 1 Samuel 28:8 “So Saul disguised himself by putting on other clothes, and he left with two men. They came to the woman by night, and he said, ‘Consult a spirit for me through necromancy; bring up for me the one I name to you.’” Historical Setting: Saul’s Spiritual Decline Samuel is dead, David is in exile, and the Philistines are massing at Shunem. Saul has already driven out mediums in formal compliance with the Law, but his earlier disobedience (1 Samuel 15) has forfeited prophetic guidance. Terrified by God’s silence (28:6), he violates his own decree and God’s explicit commands, illustrating how fear, unrepented sin, and loss of fellowship combine to produce desperate, irrational choices. Biblical Prohibitions Against Necromancy • “There shall not be found among you…a medium or spiritist or one who calls up the dead” (Deuteronomy 18:10–11). • “Do not turn to mediums or familiar spirits” (Leviticus 19:31; cf. 20:6, 27). • “When they say to you, ‘Consult the spirits…,’ should not a people consult their God?” (Isaiah 8:19). God’s law condemns necromancy because it seeks knowledge and power apart from Him and opens the door to demonic deception. Alignment of 1 Samuel 28:8 with the Anti-Necromancy Ethic 1 Samuel 28 is descriptive, not prescriptive. The narrative highlights: 1. Saul’s conscious violation of Torah. 2. The immediate recognition of wrongdoing by the medium (v. 9), confirming the practice’s illegality. 3. God’s judgment: Saul receives no comfort, only doom (vv. 16–19), and he dies “for his unfaithfulness… and for consulting a medium” (1 Chronicles 10:13–14). Thus the episode reinforces the prohibition rather than weakening it; the catastrophic outcome warns against repeating Saul’s sin. Did the Medium Truly Bring Up Samuel? Major Views 1. Divine Interruption: God Himself permits a genuine appearance of Samuel to pronounce judgment. The medium is shocked (v. 12), indicating events exceeded her craft. 2. Demonic Impersonation: A deceitful spirit mimics Samuel; God allows the message to stand as judgment. Scripture gives no license for necromancy under either view; the point is Saul’s rebellion and God’s sovereignty, not the medium’s efficacy. God’s Sovereign Judgment Displayed Whether Samuel’s presence is real or mimicked, the encounter is controlled by God, not the witch. Saul gains no strategic advantage—only the certain prophecy of his death. The scene underscores Proverbs 21:30, “No wisdom, no understanding, no counsel can prevail against the LORD.” Descriptive Narrative vs. Prescriptive Law Narratives record what happened; laws declare what ought to happen. The existence of Abraham’s lies (Genesis 12, 20) or David’s adultery (2 Samuel 11) does not sanction those sins. Likewise, Saul’s necromancy does not legitimize the practice. Archaeological and Cultural Background Excavations at Ugarit, Mari, and Neo-Assyrian sites reveal necromantic rites involving pits, figurines, and funerary offerings—paralleling Isaiah 29:4 and 1 Samuel 28:24’s meal motif. Scripture’s prohibitions are historically situated amid these pervasive pagan practices, yet stand in stark contrast. Systematic Theology: The State of the Dead Ecclesiastes 9:5 declares the dead “know nothing” of earthly affairs; Luke 16:26 teaches an impassable chasm between realms. Attempted contact is therefore futile or demonic. Hebrews 9:27 fixes destiny after death, eliminating the notion of ongoing consultation. New Testament Echoes Acts 19:18–19 records new believers burning occult books—an inspired endorsement of the Torah’s stance. Galatians 5:20 lists “sorcery” among works of the flesh that bar the kingdom of God. Revelation 21:8 places “sorcerers” with the condemned. The apostolic church inherits and intensifies the anti-necromancy ethic. Practical Applications Today • Séances, Ouija boards, and “Christianized” mediumship violate the same commandments Saul broke. • Spiritual dryness should prompt repentance and Scripture study, not occult shortcuts. • Pastors and counselors must warn that dabbling in necromancy invites demonic oppression and divine discipline. Common Objections Answered “God allowed it, so it can’t be wrong.” – God often overrules sin for His purposes (Genesis 50:20) without endorsing it. “Samuel’s words were accurate; therefore necromancy works.” – Accuracy resulted from God’s sovereignty, not the medium’s power. Truth through a sinful channel does not sanctify the channel (Numbers 22:28). “The prohibition is archaic.” – Moral law transcends culture; the New Testament reaffirms the ban. Conclusion 1 Samuel 28:8 does not conflict with biblical prohibitions against necromancy; it illustrates them. Saul’s illicit quest, God’s unaltered judgment, and the ensuing tragedy combine to warn every generation that seeking the dead violates the living God’s revealed will. |
    |