What does Saul's action in 1 Samuel 28:8 reveal about his faith in God? Canonical Text and Immediate Context 1 Samuel 28:8 : “So Saul disguised himself by wearing different clothes, and he set out at night with two men. They came to the woman, and Saul said, ‘Consult a spirit for me through the ritual pit, and bring up for me the one I name to you.’ ” The episode occurs after Yahweh has withdrawn prophetic, priestly, and revelatory guidance from Saul (28:5–6). Saul’s desperation drives him to a medium at Endor, despite his earlier purge of such practitioners (28:3). The action in 28:8 must therefore be read against the backdrop of Saul’s covenant obligations (Deuteronomy 17:14–20) and prior disobedience (1 Samuel 13; 15). External Disguise—Revelation of an Inner Disposition By swapping royal garments for common dress and traveling “by night,” Saul manifests a heart already attempting to hide from God (cf. Genesis 3:8). The secrecy is unnecessary before an omniscient LORD (Psalm 139:11–12) but entirely consistent with unbelief that seeks human approval over divine approval (Proverbs 29:25; John 12:42-43). Externally disguised, he internally displays unbelief. Consulting the Medium—Direct Rejection of Divine Sufficiency Deuteronomy 18:10-12 and Leviticus 19:31 explicitly outlaw necromancy. Saul’s choice is not merely a ceremonial lapse; it is theological treason—preferring rival spiritual sources over covenant revelation. Hebrews 11:6 identifies faith as “believing that He exists and rewards those who earnestly seek Him.” Saul’s move announces that he no longer trusts God to reward or even respond. His functional theology now says, “God is silent; I must find help elsewhere.” Legal Transgression and Covenant Unfaithfulness Kings of Israel were to write and study the law “all the days of his life” (Deuteronomy 17:19). The prohibition against mediums was crystal-clear, reinforced by capital penalties (Leviticus 20:6, 27). By deliberately violating that statute, Saul forfeits the blessings tied to covenant obedience (Deuteronomy 28). His faith—or more accurately, the hollow shell of it—collapses under the weight of crisis. Contrast With David’s Trust While Saul seeks forbidden counsel, David, exiled among Philistines, repeatedly “inquired of the LORD” and waited for divine answer (1 Samuel 23:2, 4; 30:8). The narrative sets up a literary antithesis: Saul looks downward to the grave for guidance; David looks upward to the living God. The author thereby illustrates James 1:6-8: “he who doubts is like a wave of the sea…double-minded.” Psychological and Behavioral Diagnosis From a behavioral-science standpoint, Saul displays: • Catastrophic thinking—interpreting the Philistine threat as hopeless due to past failures. • Spiritual avoidance—choosing an easier, prohibited ritual rather than repentant waiting. • Cognitive dissonance—banishing mediums publicly while seeking one privately. Each symptom aligns with apostasy described in Romans 1:21-25—knowing God yet refusing to honor Him, exchanging truth for a lie, and worshiping created powers. Divine Silence and Judicial Hardening God’s refusal to answer Saul by dreams, Urim, or prophets (28:6) is itself covenantal discipline. First Samuel 15:23 had already declared that rebellion is like the sin of divination. Saul’s current act thus confirms judicial hardening: he is given over to the very sin symbolizing his rebellion (cf. 2 Thessalonians 2:11-12). Historical and Archaeological Corroboration • Tell el-Ful (identified with Gibeah, Saul’s hometown) excavations yield Iron-Age fortifications consistent with a 10th-century BC monarchy. • The four scrolls of Samuel among the Dead Sea corpus (4Q51-4Q54) faithfully preserve this narrative, differing only in orthographic minutiae—underscoring textual reliability. • The wider geopolitical portrait—Philistine pressure verified by the Philistine four-room houses at Tel Miqne (Ekron)—authenticates the crisis setting behind Saul’s panic. Theological Ramifications: Sovereignty, Providence, and Judgment Saul’s turning to necromancy highlights God’s sovereign governance of even illicit acts. The LORD allows Samuel to appear (28:12-15) not to endorse the medium but to pronounce irreversible judgment (28:18-19). Providence thus bends human rebellion to fulfill divine decree. Practical and Pastoral Lessons 1. Delayed guidance is not divine absence; impatience can breed idolatry. 2. Secret sin always publicizes unbelief; faith rests transparently in God’s timing. 3. Spiritual shortcuts end in spiritual ruin (1 Chron 10:13-14). 4. True faith submits to Scriptural boundaries even when heaven seems silent. Summary Answer Saul’s action in 1 Samuel 28:8 exposes a faith that has deteriorated into unbelief. By disguising himself, seeking a medium, and violating explicit Torah commands, Saul demonstrates that his trust is no longer in Yahweh’s word or character. The act is both symptom and proof of apostasy: fear-driven, law-breaking, and ultimately self-destructive, standing in stark opposition to a life of persevering faith that waits for and obeys God. |
    |