How does 2 Kings 18:36 demonstrate obedience to leadership and God's command? Setting the Scene 2 Kings 18 records the tense moment when the Assyrian field commander mocked Judah’s trust in the LORD. Standing before Jerusalem’s walls, he tried to provoke the people into fear and rebellion. Verse 36 captures Judah’s unexpected reaction: “ ‘But the people remained silent and did not answer a word, for Hezekiah had commanded, “Do not answer him.”’ ” (2 Kings 18:36) The King’s Command and the People’s Response • Hezekiah, a godly king (2 Kings 18:5-6), clearly instructs the people: “Do not answer him.” • The people “remained silent,” holding their tongues despite ridicule. • Their restraint is immediate and complete—“not … a word.” Layers of Obedience on Display 1. Obedience to God-appointed leadership • Scripture teaches that legitimate authority comes from God (Romans 13:1). • By honoring Hezekiah’s directive, Judah submits to the structure God set in place. 2. Trust in God’s strategy, not human rebuttal • Earlier Hezekiah sought the LORD (2 Kings 19:1), indicating that silence was rooted in divine guidance, not mere political calculation. • Choosing silence mirrored the principle, “The battle belongs to the LORD” (1 Samuel 17:47). 3. Guarding the tongue for righteousness • Proverbs 10:19 reminds, “When words are many, sin is unavoidable, but he who restrains his lips is wise.” • Their silence protected them from doubt-filled, fear-filled speech that could undermine faith. Scriptures Reinforcing the Principle • Hebrews 13:17: “Obey your leaders and submit to them … allow them to lead with joy.” • Deuteronomy 28:1: “If you will diligently obey the voice of the LORD your God …” • John 14:15: “If you love Me, you will keep My commandments.” Timeless Takeaways • God often channels His guidance through trustworthy leaders; honoring them is inseparable from honoring Him. • Obedience may require active silence—holding back words so faith can rise. • The LORD defends those who place their confidence in His directives rather than in clever arguments. |
    |