Acts 11:2 & Matt 18:15: Dispute resolution?
How does Acts 11:2 connect with Matthew 18:15 on addressing disagreements?

Setting the Scene in Acts 11

• Peter has just returned to Jerusalem after preaching in Caesarea, where the Holy Spirit fell on uncircumcised Gentiles (Acts 10).

Acts 11:2–3: “So when Peter went up to Jerusalem, the circumcised believers contended with him and said, ‘You went to uncircumcised men and ate with them.’ ”

• Jewish believers feel Peter has crossed a clear boundary of the Law. They approach him directly, not through rumors or public denouncement.


Jesus’ Blueprint for Conflict

Matthew 18:15: “If your brother sins against you, go and confront him privately. If he listens to you, you have won your brother over.”

• Three core steps in Jesus’ instruction:

– Personal approach (“go”)

– Clear confrontation (“confront him”)

– Aim of restoration (“you have won your brother”)


How Acts 11 Lives Out Matthew 18

• Direct contact: the circumcised believers “contended with” Peter themselves—no third-party gossip.

• Specific issue named: “You went to uncircumcised men and ate with them.”

• Listening and explanation: Peter recounts the vision, the Spirit’s work, and Scripture (“I remembered the word of the Lord,” v. 16).

• Restoration: verse 18, “When they heard this, they fell silent and glorified God.” The fellowship is preserved, and praise replaces criticism.

• The sequence mirrors Jesus’ teaching almost step-for-step.


Principles We Can Apply

• Go to the person, not around the person.

• State the concern clearly and biblically.

• Give space for a full explanation (James 1:19).

• Measure everything by the Word and the Spirit’s observable work (Galatians 5:25).

• Celebrate repentance or clarification; worship replaces tension.


Motive Matters

• The goal is winning a brother, not winning an argument (2 Timothy 2:24).

• Love “covers a multitude of sins” (1 Peter 4:8); confrontation is an act of love, not suspicion.

• Unity is precious (Psalm 133:1); protect it through honest, face-to-face dialogue.


When Disagreement Leads to Deeper Understanding

• Peter’s account expands their grasp of God’s plan: “So then, God has granted even the Gentiles repentance unto life” (Acts 11:18, paraphrase).

• Honest confrontation often becomes a doorway to fresh revelation and wider ministry.


Additional Echoes in Scripture

Proverbs 27:5–6 — “Better an open rebuke than hidden love.”

Galatians 2:11–14 — Paul confronts Peter publicly when the issue affects many.

Ephesians 4:15 — “Speaking the truth in love, we will in all things grow up into Christ.”


Putting It All Together

Acts 11:2 shows the early church practicing the very method Jesus laid out in Matthew 18:15. Direct, loving confrontation preserved unity, clarified doctrine, and opened the door for the gospel to reach farther than anyone expected. The same pattern—face-to-face, Scripture-anchored, Spirit-guided, love-motivated—remains the Lord’s proven path for handling disagreements today.

What can we learn from Peter's response to criticism in Acts 11:2?
Top of Page
Top of Page