Acts 28:27 vs. free will in faith?
How does Acts 28:27 challenge the concept of free will in accepting faith?

Text of Acts 28:27

“For this people’s heart has grown callous; their ears are dull, and they have closed their eyes. Otherwise they might see with their eyes, hear with their ears, understand with their hearts, and turn, and I would heal them.”


Literary Setting

Paul delivers this citation from Isaiah 6:9-10 to Rome’s Jewish leaders after a whole-day dialogue (Acts 28:23-24). Some are persuaded; “others refused to believe” (v. 24). The quotation explains that unbelief is not merely intellectual ignorance but a spiritual condition foretold by God.


Old Testament Background

Isaiah’s original oracle follows his vision of Yahweh (Isaiah 6). The prophet is commissioned to proclaim a message that will harden rather than heal, exposing rebellion. The verb tenses in Hebrew (hiphil) indicate divine agency (“make the heart of this people dull”), yet the people themselves “close” their eyes (reflexive nuance). Acts reproduces the Septuagint phrasing, emphasizing both divine judgment and human culpability.


Divine Sovereignty and Judicial Hardening

The clause “their heart has grown callous” indicates an already-existing state; “they have closed their eyes” assigns responsibility to the people. Yet the result—continued blindness—is presented as God’s decree. Scripture elsewhere treats hardening as both: Pharaoh “hardened his heart” (Exodus 8:15) and “the LORD hardened Pharaoh’s heart” (Exodus 9:12). Acts 28:27 therefore confronts libertarian views of free will by affirming that God may give a sinner over to chosen obstinacy (Romans 1:24-28).


Compatibilism in Luke-Acts

Luke repeatedly pairs human freedom with divine determination:

Acts 2:23—Jesus delivered up “by God’s set plan and foreknowledge,” yet “you executed.”

Acts 13:48—“All who were appointed to eternal life believed.”

Acts 16:14—Lydia listens, but “the Lord opened her heart.”

Accordingly, Acts 28:27 maintains that genuine moral decisions occur (“some were persuaded,” v. 24) while ultimate receptivity depends on God’s enabling grace.


Philosophical Implications for Free Will

If “seeing” and “hearing” require prior divine healing, fallen humanity possesses only a will enslaved to sin (John 8:34). Moral ability is lost; natural ability (rational faculties) remains. This negates the notion that anyone can autonomously choose Christ. Instead, prevenient or effectual grace must awaken the faculties so the heart can “turn.” Biblical faith is therefore a gift (Ephesians 2:8-9; Philippians 1:29).


Historical Reliability of Acts

Archaeology affirms Luke’s precision:

• The Gallio Delphi Inscription (AD 51) synchronizes with Acts 18:12.

• Politarch titles on Thessalonian archways match Acts 17:6.

• Publius as “first man” of Malta (Acts 28:7) fits local epigraphic usage.

Such accuracy supports the authenticity of Paul’s Isaiah quotation; it is not a later theological insertion but the evangelist’s faithful record.


Jewish Unbelief as Prophetic Fulfillment

Paul frames Israel’s resistance as anticipated, not accidental (cf. Romans 11:7-10). This deflects the charge that Christianity arose merely because Gentiles were more credulous. Instead, God’s saving plan intentionally works through a “partial hardening” (Romans 11:25) to invite the nations and provoke Israel to jealousy.


Miraculous Validation

Immediately before the Isaiah citation, Paul heals Publius’s father (Acts 28:8-9), and “the rest on the island who were sick also came and were cured.” The juxtaposition distinguishes physical healing—graciously granted to any who ask—from spiritual healing, which unbelievers refuse. Contemporary medically verified healings, documented in peer-reviewed journals (e.g., spontaneous regression of aggressive cancers after intercessory prayer), echo Luke’s pattern: signs point to a deeper need for repentance.


Pastoral and Missional Lessons

• Expect mixed responses when proclaiming the gospel—even with irrefutable proofs.

• Pray for God to grant repentance (2 Timothy 2:25).

• Guard against personal hardening; believers, too, can dull their hearing (Hebrews 3:13).


Conclusion

Acts 28:27 does not abolish human responsibility; it exposes the bondage of the will. Left to themselves, people freely but irresistibly choose unbelief. Only the sovereign God who created the ear and the eye (Psalm 94:9) can unstop and unveil them. The verse therefore challenges any anthropology asserting autonomous spiritual self-rescue, driving us to depend wholly on the regenerating work of the risen Christ through the Holy Spirit.

How can we apply Acts 28:27 to evangelism efforts in our community?
Top of Page
Top of Page