How does Acts 7:28 reflect the Israelites' perception of Moses? Canonical Text and Immediate Context Acts 7:28: “‘Do you want to kill me as you killed the Egyptian yesterday?’” Stephen, standing before the Sanhedrin, quotes Exodus 2:14 to remind his hearers how their ancestors responded when Moses first attempted to intervene on their behalf. The remark is hurled at Moses by a fellow Israelite whom Moses had just tried to reconcile with his brother (Exodus 2:13–14). The Israelite’s taunt, faithfully reproduced by Stephen, is the lens through which we read their perception of Moses at that moment. Historical Backdrop in Exodus 1. Moses is forty years old (Acts 7:23) and newly stirred to “visit his brothers, the sons of Israel.” 2. Having killed an Egyptian taskmaster, Moses assumes his people will grasp “that God was granting them deliverance by his hand” (Acts 7:25). 3. Instead, the Hebrew combatant greets Moses’ peacemaking with suspicion and hostility: “Who made you ruler and judge over us?” (Exodus 2:14). This reaction crystallizes the Israelites’ initial assessment of Moses: an outsider, self-appointed, potentially dangerous. Cultural and Psychological Dimensions • Cultural Memory of Oppression Having endured centuries of Egyptian subjugation (cf. Exodus 1:11–14), Israelites had formed a survivalist mindset wary of anyone who might exacerbate their plight. Moses, raised in Pharaoh’s court (Acts 7:21–22), looked Egyptian (Exodus 2:19) and spoke as a prince—not a slave. His intervention therefore triggers defensiveness rather than gratitude. • In-Group Suspicion of an Out-Group Insider Behavioral science recognizes “boundary ambiguity,” where a person straddling two identities is distrusted by both. Moses is biologically Hebrew yet culturally Egyptian. The reaction in Acts 7:28 exemplifies this phenomenon centuries before social psychology named it. Theological Trajectory in Stephen’s Sermon Stephen portrays a consistent pattern: 1. Joseph—rejected by his brothers (Acts 7:9). 2. Moses—rejected by Israelites (Acts 7:27–28). 3. The prophets—persecuted by their own nation (Acts 7:52). 4. Jesus—the Righteous One betrayed and murdered (Acts 7:52). Thus Acts 7:28 serves as a historical precedent for Israel’s recurring resistance to God-sent deliverers, climaxing in their treatment of Christ. Typological Echoes with Christ • Moses offers salvation; Israel rebuffs him. • Jesus offers salvation; Israel’s leaders crucify Him. • Both nevertheless become the ordained Redeemer: Moses leads Israel out of Egypt; Jesus leads believers out of sin and death by His resurrection (Romans 6:4). Archaeological Corroboration of the Exodus Setting • Brooklyn Papyrus 35.1446 (c. 18th Dynasty) lists Northwest Semitic slave names (similar to “Shiphrah,” Exodus 1:15), evidencing a Semitic slave presence in Egypt. • Timna Valley copper-mining inscriptions reference a Semitic labor force in the Late Bronze Age. • The Ipuwer Papyrus (Leiden 344) speaks of Nile water turning to blood and widespread death of firstborn—descriptions paralleling the plagues narrative. These artifacts, while not explicit validations, corroborate the setting in which Moses’ early rejection occurs. Moses’ Subsequent Vindication God appears in the burning bush (Exodus 3), appoints Moses with divine authority, and confirms by miracles (Exodus 4:1–9). Forty years after rejection, Moses returns, demonstrating that God—not the people—determines leadership. Stephen’s audience is meant to infer that the resurrected Christ has been vindicated in the same manner (Acts 2:24, 36). Practical Implications for Readers 1. Evaluate Deliverers by God’s Commission, Not Popular Acclaim. 2. Guard Against Reflexive Cynicism That Blinds One to Divine Rescue. 3. Recognize Rejection as a Possible Prelude to God’s Greater Vindication. 4. See in Moses a shadow; behold in Christ the substance. Summary Acts 7:28 captures the Israelites’ initial perception of Moses as an illegitimate, threatening interloper. Stephen employs this detail to reveal a longstanding pattern of resisting God-appointed saviors, culminating in the rejection of Jesus. The verse highlights human skepticism toward divine intervention, yet ultimately magnifies God’s sovereignty in appointing and vindicating His chosen deliverer—finally and fully in the risen Christ. |
    |