What does Acts 7:28 reveal about Moses' character and leadership qualities? Text of Acts 7:28 “‘Do you want to kill me as you killed the Egyptian yesterday?’ ” Immediate Literary Context This question forms part of Stephen’s defense before the Sanhedrin (Acts 7:2–53). Recounting Exodus 2:11-15, Stephen highlights Israel’s initial rejection of Moses. Verse 28 records the retort of the Hebrew man whom Moses tried to reconcile after Moses had slain an Egyptian oppressor. The remark exposes Moses’ hidden deed and tests his motives. Historical Setting in Exodus 2 • Moses, forty years old (Acts 7:23), had been raised in Pharaoh’s court yet “went out to visit his own people” (Exodus 2:11). • He kills the Egyptian (Exodus 2:12) out of indignation at injustice. • The next day he intervenes in a dispute between two Hebrews (Exodus 2:13). Their reproach—quoted verbatim by Stephen—reveals Moses’ deed and forces his flight to Midian. Zeal for Justice Acts 7:28 presupposes Moses’ earlier act. His willingness to risk royal favor and personal safety to defend a slave evidences moral courage and a deep sense of right and wrong. Hebrews 11:24-25 underlines that he “refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter,” choosing “mistreatment with God’s people.” The rebuke “as you killed the Egyptian” thus reflects a leader marked by righteous indignation against oppression. Identification with God’s People Leaving palace privilege, Moses aligns with the Hebrews. This solidarity foreshadows the later sacrificial leadership typified in Christ (Philippians 2:6-8). Acts 7:28 therefore highlights a leader who places covenant loyalty above personal advancement. Courage and Protective Instinct Killing the Egyptian shows boldness; stepping between quarreling Hebrews shows peacemaking instinct. Moses accepts physical and reputational risk to protect the vulnerable. These traits anticipate his future advocacy before Pharaoh and intercession for Israel (Exodus 32:11-14). Premature Action and Impulsiveness Acts 7:28 is also a rebuke of Moses’ timing. He acts without divine command, relying on personal strength. The Hebrews’ question implies distrust: if Moses solved injustice by violence yesterday, will he now turn that force on fellow Hebrews? Leadership divorced from God-given mandate breeds suspicion. Early Recognition of a Calling Acts 7:25 notes that Moses “thought his brothers would understand that God was delivering them through him, but they did not recognize it.” Verse 28 reveals their blindness and Moses’ nascent, intuitive sense of mission—a mission requiring refinement in Midian. Humility and Teachability Through Exile The exposure in v. 28 drives Moses into forty years of obscurity (Acts 7:30). Shepherding in Midian tempers impetuosity, cultivating meekness (Numbers 12:3). Verse 28 thus functions as the divine hinge moving Moses from self-directed zeal to Spirit-empowered leadership. Foreshadowing Covenant Mediatorship Israel’s rejection (“Who made you ruler and judge?” v. 27) prefigures later resistance to prophets and ultimately to Jesus (Acts 7:52). Moses’ experience, initiated by the accusation in v. 28, typologically anticipates the rejected-then-vindicated Redeemer. Balanced Leadership Portrait Acts 7:28 reveals: 1. Passionate justice seeker. 2. Courageous defender. 3. Patriot identifying with the oppressed. 4. Impulsive actor needing divine commission. 5. Teachable servant shaped by adversity. 6. Prototype of the rejected deliverer validated by God. Practical Applications • Zeal must be yoked to God’s timing (Proverbs 19:2). • True leadership shares in the sufferings of those led (1 Peter 5:2-3). • Public failure can become the crucible for character formation (Romans 8:28). • Rejection is not disqualification when God’s call is sure (Galatians 1:15). Concluding Synthesis Acts 7:28, though a single sentence, unpacks a multilayered view of Moses: courageous yet impulsive, justice-driven yet uncommissioned, identifying with God’s people yet initially misunderstood. Divine providence transforms these raw qualities into the humility, patience, and faith that define Israel’s great lawgiver. |
    |