Why is there a discrepancy in the age of Azariah's reign in 2 Kings 15:2? The Text as It Stands 2 Kings 15:2 reads: “He was sixteen years old when he became king, and he reigned in Jerusalem fifty-two years. His mother’s name was Jecoliah of Jerusalem.” The Masoretic Text, the great majority of Hebrew manuscripts, the Dead Sea fragment 4QKgs, the Vulgate, and the Peshitta all agree on “sixteen.” Where the Question Arises 1. A handful of later Septuagint (LXX) manuscripts read “twenty-six.” 2. The synchronism in 2 Kings 15:1—“the twenty-seventh year of Jeroboam”—appears to conflict with earlier notices that Azariah (Uzziah) was made king while his father Amaziah still lived (2 Kings 14:21; 2 Chron 26:1). Critics therefore wonder whether the age, the length of the reign, or both have been corrupted. Co-Regency: The Key to the Chronology Ancient Near-Eastern kings often installed sons as co-regents long before the official sole reign began (e.g., Thutmose III with his son Amenhotep II; Assyrian limmu lists). Judah followed the same practice: 1. Amaziah was taken captive at Lachish (2 Kings 14:13). The people made his sixteen-year-old son co-regent (14:21). 2. Amaziah was assassinated roughly twelve years later (14:17–20). Only at that point did Azariah’s sole reign begin, “in the twenty-seventh year of Jeroboam” (15:1). 3. The writer of Kings, consistent with his normal practice, dates the ANCHOR point of a king’s official reign from the beginning of the sole reign, not the co-regency. Accession-Year vs. Non-Accession-Year Reckoning • Judah customarily used the Tishri calendar and accession-year dating; Israel used the Nisan calendar and non-accession dating. • Jeroboam II’s “twenty-seventh year” corresponds to 767 BC (fall of 768 → fall of 767), which is the first year of Azariah’s sole reign. • Add Azariah’s fifty-two years, and you arrive at 716/715 BC—precisely the year Hezekiah ascended (2 Kings 18:1). The entire chronology locks together without forcing any figure. Why “Sixteen” Still Fits If Azariah was sixteen when appointed co-regent (~779 BC), he was twenty-eight at the start of the official count (~767 BC). Scripture is merely silent about his exact age at sole accession; it is not contradictory. The apparent gap dissolves once co-regency is allowed. Archaeological and Epigraphic Support • The Uzziah Tablet (discovered 1931, now in the Israel Museum): “Here were brought the bones of Uzziah, king of Judah. Do not open.” The paleography dates it to the period shortly after 701 BC—consistent with a death decades earlier, as the biblical timeline requires. • Tiglath-Pileser III’s annals (Iran Stele line 15) list “Azriyau of Yaudi” among tributary kings c. 738 BC—exactly within the latter half of Azariah’s fifty-two-year span. These external witnesses confirm a long reign ending well before Hezekiah, reinforcing the biblical numbers. Scribal Safeguards Hebrew copyists employed “Sopherim tallies” and letter-counts to protect numerals. The Masoretes added marginal qere/ketiv notes whenever they suspected anomalies; no such note appears at 2 Kings 15:2. The unmarked text therefore enjoyed unanimous confidence from the most meticulous textual tradition in antiquity. Theological Implications 1. Inerrancy stands: no contradiction exists once the historical practice of co-regency and the dual calendar system are recognized. 2. God’s providence in redemptive history is underscored; even “dry” chronological notes bind the narrative together and point to the reliability of the larger story culminating in the Resurrection (Acts 13:34–37). 3. Scripture’s self-authenticating nature: the very precision often attacked by skeptics emerges, on closer inspection, as evidence of a coherent, Spirit-breathed record (2 Timothy 3:16). Summary The alleged discrepancy in Azariah’s age evaporates when (1) the overwhelming textual evidence for “sixteen” is acknowledged, (2) co-regency and calendar methodology are applied, and (3) archaeological data are consulted. The Scripture remains internally consistent and historically trustworthy, vindicating the God who speaks truth in every word. |
    |