What historical context surrounds the writing of Psalm 35:11? Text of Psalm 35:11 “Malicious witnesses rise up; they question me about things I do not know.” Superscription and Authorial Attribution The Hebrew heading לְדָוִד (ledāvid, “of David”) ties Psalm 35 to the historical person King David. The early Masoretic tradition, the Septuagint’s superscription Ψαλμὸς τῷ Δαυΐδ, and the Qumran scroll 11Q5 (11QPsalmᵃ) all preserve this attribution, leaving no serious textual reason to doubt Davidic authorship. Since Psalm titles are part of the earliest canonical layer, their testimony carries weight equal to the body of the text (cf. Luke 20:42 affirming a superscription). Probable Life Setting in David’s Biography Two seasons in David’s life align with the lament over treacherous accusers: 1. Saul’s persecution (1 Samuel 18–27). David, innocent yet suspected of sedition, was betrayed at Keilah (1 Samuel 23:1-12) and Ziph (1 Samuel 23:19-24). Both occasions involved locals “informing” on David before the royal court—fitting the phrase “malicious witnesses rise up.” 2. Absalom’s conspiracy (2 Samuel 15–17). David’s former allies defected and slandered him to gain political favor. Shimei’s verbal assault (2 Samuel 16:5-13) provides a concrete episode of public accusation “about things I do not know.” Either period lies within roughly 1015–971 B.C., consistent with Ussher’s chronology and early‐monarchic Israel. Legal and Cultural Context of False Witness in Ancient Israel Deuteronomy 19:15-21 required a minimum of two corroborating witnesses and condemned perjury with talionic justice. Psalm 35:11 echoes this judicial backdrop: David faces a fictitious lawsuit where accusers invent charges. Outside Israel, contemporary Near-Eastern law codes (e.g., Code of Hammurabi §1-4) likewise criminalized false testimony, underscoring the gravity of David’s complaint. Political Climate of the Early Monarchy Archaeological data confirm the turbulent emergence of a united monarchy: • Tel Dan Stele (mid-9th century B.C.) names the “House of David,” validating David as a historical dynast. • Khirbet Qeiyafa ostracon (circa 1000 B.C.) reveals a Judahite administrative center capable of producing written litigation—precisely the milieu for malicious legal machinations. These finds negate the minimalist notion that David is a late literary invention. Liturgical and Judicial Function of Imprecatory Psalms Psalm 35 is an individual lament with imprecatory elements (vv. 4-8, 26). In Israel’s cultus it served as both personal prayer and covenant lawsuit, inviting Yahweh to act as the impartial Judge (cf. Psalm 7:6-9). Verse 11 forms the legal indictment section, sharpening the courtroom motif. Archaeological Corroboration of Davidic Era 1. The Stepped Stone Structure and Large Stone Structure in Jerusalem’s City of David match 10th-century strata, plausibly part of David’s royal complex (cf. 2 Samuel 5:9). 2. Bullae bearing the names of royal officials (e.g., Jehucal son of Shelemiah, Jeremiah 37:3) confirm bureaucratic operations where false testimonies could be formally recorded. Intertextual Echoes in Later Scripture and the Life of Christ Isaiah 53:7-9 and Mark 14:55-59 describe “false witnesses” against the Messiah, consciously echoing Psalm 35:11. Jesus, the greater David, fulfilled the typology by enduring perjury and yet offering salvation through His resurrection (1 Corinthians 15:3-8), a historical event attested by multiple early, independent testimonies (creed in 1 Corinthians 15 pre-A.D. 36; empty tomb tradition in Mark 16:1-8; and eyewitness clusters listed by Luke 24 and Acts 1). Theological Implications within Redemptive History David’s experience prefigures the righteous sufferer motif culminating in Christ. The reality of malicious witnesses spotlights human depravity and the necessity of a Divine Advocate. God’s vindication of David anticipates the ultimate vindication of Jesus through the resurrection, guaranteeing justification for all who trust Him (Romans 4:24-25). Thus Psalm 35:11’s historical context is not merely ancient biography; it is a thread woven into the consistent, God-breathed tapestry of redemption. |
    |