How does Daniel 7:28 challenge our understanding of prophecy and its fulfillment? Immediate Literary Function Daniel has just watched four great beasts, the heavenly court, the “Ancient of Days,” and the coronation of the “Son of Man.” Verse 28 signals narrative closure, yet its unresolved tone invites the reader to keep looking for the fulfillment—creating tension between revelation already given and fulfillment still pending. Prophetic Authenticity and Historical Verifiability 1. Four-empire schema. Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, and Rome rose exactly in the order and character Daniel outlined (cf. vv. 4-7, 17). Predictive accuracy centuries in advance argues for divine authorship (Isaiah 46:9-10). 2. Dead Sea Scrolls. 4QDanᵃ, 4QDanᵇ, and 4QDanᵈ (ca. 125–50 BC) prove Daniel circulated before the final Seleucid struggles the book predicts, ruling out a late-Maccabean fabrication. 3. Septuagint (Old Greek) translation of Daniel predates the first Christian century; even hostile critics admit it contains the same prophecies Jesus cited (Matthew 24:15). Dual-Fulfillment Framework Daniel 7 unfolds on two horizons: • Near fulfillment—Antiochus IV Epiphanes prefigures the “little horn” (v. 8). • Ultimate fulfillment—an eschatological Antichrist culminates the pattern (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4; Revelation 13). Verse 28 challenges us to allow Scripture to layer prophecy without forcing an either-or timeline. Eschatological Scope: Already and Not Yet The coronation of the Son of Man (v. 14) is inaugurated at Christ’s resurrection and ascension (Matthew 28:18; Acts 2:32-36) yet awaits consummation at His visible return (Revelation 11:15). Daniel’s unsettled reaction models the tension believers live in: the kingdom is present yet future. Psychological Impact on the Prophet Daniel’s pallor and secrecy (v. 28) counter any notion that prophecy is mere cryptic code-writing. Genuine revelation overwhelmed a seasoned statesman. This authenticity marker sets biblical prophecy apart from apocalyptic fiction, which usually ends with triumphant certainty rather than disturbed silence. Hermeneutical Implications: Humility and Precision Because Daniel himself struggled to assimilate what he saw, interpreters must resist overconfidence. Prophecy is crystal clear in retrospect (fulfilled empires) yet partially veiled ahead of time (final Antichrist). Verse 28 teaches both confidence in God’s plan and caution about setting dates. Christological Trajectory Jesus self-identified with Daniel’s Son of Man (Mark 14:61-62). The Sanhedrin’s violent reaction makes sense only if they believed Daniel’s vision pointed to a divine, messianic figure. Daniel 7:28 thus indirectly authenticates Jesus’ claim and the resurrection that vindicated it (Romans 1:4). Pastoral and Devotional Implications Verse 28 calls believers to sober reflection, not escapist speculation. Daniel internalized the vision, stewarding it until the appropriate moment. Likewise, Christians carry the gospel with urgency and gravity, knowing history is moving toward the same courtroom scene Daniel witnessed. Objections and Responses • “Daniel is late and vaticinium ex eventu.” Dead Sea Scrolls and linguistic Aramaic features contradict this. • “Prophecy failed because the kingdom didn’t come in Daniel’s lifetime.” Progressive fulfillment—already inaugurated in Christ—answers this, paralleling Isaiah’s servant songs that unfold over centuries. • “No evidence for a final Antichrist.” Global totalitarian experiments of the 20th–21st centuries show how swiftly technology and ideology can converge under a single leader, making Daniel’s description increasingly plausible. Conclusion Daniel 7:28 stretches our categories by revealing prophecy that is simultaneously precise enough to be testable and broad enough to encompass multiple horizons of fulfillment. Its unsettled ending urges humility before the God who alone “changes times and seasons” (Daniel 2:21) and guarantees that every vision He grants will reach its appointed climax in Jesus Christ. |
    |