How does Daniel 9:5 fit into the broader context of Daniel's prayer? Text of Daniel 9:5 “we have sinned and done wrong. We have acted wickedly and rebelled; we have turned away from Your commandments and ordinances.” Placement Within Daniel 9:3-19—The Penitential Framework Daniel 9 records one cohesive prayer that runs from verse 3 through verse 19. Verse 5 falls near the opening confession (vv. 4-6), establishing the moral and theological groundwork for every subsequent plea. The verse is not an isolated admission; it is the centerpiece of a concentric structure in which confession (vv. 4-6) leads to acknowledgment of God’s righteousness (vv. 7-14), culminating in petition for mercy (vv. 15-19). In other words, 9:5 supplies the “charge sheet” that justifies Israel’s exile and undergirds Daniel’s appeal for restoration. Five-Fold Verbal Cascade—Intensifying Corporate Guilt Verse 5 piles up five Hebrew verbs: ḥāṭā’ (“sinned”), ‘āwāh (“done wrong”), rāša‘ (“acted wickedly”), mārad (“rebelled”), sār (“turned aside”). Each verb escalates responsibility, painting a comprehensive picture of covenant breach: moral, legal, volitional, and ritual. By confessing in the plural, Daniel aligns himself with the nation; this corporate solidarity echoes Leviticus 26:40-42 and fulfills the requirement that national sin be acknowledged before covenant blessings can resume (cf. 2 Chronicles 7:14). Covenantal Backdrop—Why the Exile Happened Daniel explicitly roots Israel’s predicament in failure to heed the commandments and ordinances given through Moses (cf. Daniel 9:11, Deuteronomy 28). Verse 5 thus bridges Jeremiah’s prophecy of seventy years of desolation (Jeremiah 25:11; 29:10) and its fulfillment under Cyrus (2 Chronicles 36:22-23; Ezra 1:1-4). The prayer accepts the justice of God’s disciplinary exile while appealing to the same covenant for promised mercy once repentance occurs. Literary Symmetry—From Confession to Petition 1. Verses 4-6: Confession (climax in v. 5). 2. Verses 7-14: Recognition of divine righteousness and explanation of judgment. 3. Verses 15-19: Petition for mercy, rooted in God’s past redemptive acts (“You brought Your people out of Egypt,” v. 15). Daniel 9:5 therefore functions as the hinge upon which the prayer swings from guilt to hope; without explicit acknowledgment of transgression, the appeal to God’s compassion (v. 18) would lack legal standing within the covenant framework. Historical and Archaeological Corroboration Babylonian ration tablets naming “Yaukin, king of Judah” confirm the exile’s historicity. The Cyrus Cylinder matches the edict referenced in verses 2 and 25, validating the timeframe in which Daniel intercedes. Portions of Daniel (notably 4QDana-c) discovered at Qumran (c. 150 BC or earlier) demonstrate the prayer’s antiquity and textual stability, matching the Masoretic tradition quoted in modern Bibles. The Prophetic Horizon—Prelude to the Seventy ‘Sevens’ (vv. 24-27) Daniel’s confession in verse 5 sets the stage for Gabriel’s answer: the vision of seventy “weeks” that pinpoints the coming of Messiah and ultimate atonement (“to put an end to sin,” v. 24). The depth of sin enumerated in v. 5 anticipates an atonement greater than animal sacrifices—fulfilled in the once-for-all resurrection-validated offering of Christ (Hebrews 9:26-28; 1 Corinthians 15:3-4). Theological Implications for Prayer Today Daniel 9:5 teaches that authentic intercession begins with honest, comprehensive confession. It models humility, corporate identification, and reliance on God’s covenant mercy—a template echoed in Nehemiah 9 and the Lord’s Prayer (“forgive us our debts,” Matthew 6:12). By acknowledging sin’s breadth, believers position themselves to receive grace and to plead effectively for church and nation. Conclusion—Verse 5 as the Moral Nexus Daniel 9:5 is the linchpin of Daniel’s penitential prayer: it articulates Israel’s covenantal guilt, justifies divine judgment, and paves the legal road for mercy, restoration of Jerusalem, and ultimately the messianic redemption predicted later in the chapter. |
    |