Does 1 Corinthians 5:13 support excommunication for unrepentant sinners? Canonical Text “God will judge those outside. ‘Expel the wicked man from among you.’” (1 Corinthians 5:13) Literary Context: 1 Corinthians 5 as a Whole Paul addresses a notorious case of incest tolerated by the Corinthian assembly (vv. 1–2). His immediate command—“hand this man over to Satan” (v. 5)—is framed by two motives: the sinner’s ultimate salvation and the church’s purity. Verse 13 closes the argument by citing Deuteronomy 17:7; 24:7 in the Septuagint, transferring Israel’s covenant-community principle directly to the New-Covenant church. Original-Language Insight “Expel” translates the aorist imperative ἐξάρατε (exárate), from ἐξαίρω, “remove utterly, drive out.” The aorist imperative requires decisive, completed action, not mere verbal rebuke. The citation formula (“καὶ ἐξαρεῖτε…”) in Deuteronomy LXX carries juridical force: to purge evil for communal holiness (cf. Deuteronomy 13:5; 19:19). Paul intentionally retains that semantic range. Inter-Textual Support for Formal Discipline • Matthew 18:15-17—Jesus outlines incremental discipline culminating in treating the unrepentant “as a Gentile and a tax collector.” • Romans 16:17—“Keep away from them.” • 2 Thessalonians 3:6, 14—“Keep away… do not associate.” • Titus 3:10—“Reject a divisive person after a first and second warning.” • Revelation 2:14-16, 20—Christ threatens churches tolerating immorality and false teaching. The coherence of these passages demonstrates a uniform apostolic practice: persistent, public sin meets relational severance until repentance. Historical-Theological Trajectory • Early Church: The Didache (15.3) instructs, “reprove each other, but any who sins against another let no one speak with him until he repents.” • Ignatius, Letter to the Smyrnaeans 6: “Avoid the infected, lest you be corrupted.” • Second-Century Apologists record public confession prior to re-admittance. • Council of Nicaea (AD 325, Canon 11) formalized restoration rites after exclusion, mirroring Paul’s goal in 2 Corinthians 2:5-8. Purpose of Excommunication 1. Restorative: “so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord” (1 Corinthians 5:5). Exclusion awakens conscience. 2. Purificatory: “a little leaven leavens the whole batch” (v. 6). Moral contagion endangers the flock (cf. Leviticus 19:2; 1 Peter 1:16). 3. Missional: The church’s witness is compromised when scandal remains unchecked (Philippians 2:15). 4. Obediential: Submission to apostolic instruction evidences allegiance to Christ’s lordship (John 14:15). Pastoral Procedure (Synthesizing Scriptural Data) 1. Private confrontation (Matthew 18:15). 2. One or two witnesses (Matthew 18:16). 3. Public announcement and plea (Matthew 18:17a; 1 Timothy 5:20). 4. Formal removal from fellowship, Lord’s Table, and leadership roles (1 Corinthians 5:11-12). 5. Continual prayer and invitation to repentance (2 Corinthians 2:7-8). Common Objections Answered • “Isn’t exclusion unloving?” Hebrews 12:6 equates discipline with paternal love; absence of discipline is hatred (Proverbs 13:24). • “Didn’t Jesus eat with sinners?” He did so to call sinners to repentance (Luke 5:32). Persistent refusal after repeated calls meets sterner measures. • “Judge not?” The prohibition of Matthew 7:1 targets hypocritical judgment, not church governance. Paul explicitly differentiates judging insiders versus outsiders (1 Corinthians 5:12-13). Exegetical Links to Old Testament Covenant Purging Israel’s civil penalties (stoning/cutting off) foreshadow ecclesial, non-violent separation: • Leviticus 13—Lepers quarantined. • Numbers 15—Sabbath-breaker cut off. • Joshua 7—Achan’s removal protected national sanctity. Paul re-applies the typological logic minus the theocratic sword, employing spiritual boundaries instead. Behavioural Science Observation Contemporary clinical studies on community boundary-maintenance (e.g., Baumeister & Leary’s belongingness theory) confirm that clear consequences for deviant behavior increase the likelihood of behavioral correction. Spiritual application parallels: defined church discipline creates conditions conducive to genuine repentance without enabling dysfunction. Philosophical Consistency If moral realism is true—and Scripture affirms objective morality—then communal enforcement of moral norms is rational. Allowing flagrant evil to persist undermines moral knowledge and erodes collective eudaimonia, contravening the telos of glorifying God (1 Corinthians 10:31). Outcome in Corinth 2 Corinthians 2:5-11 reveals the man’s repentance and Paul’s call for restoration—evidence that excommunication, rightly administered, achieves its redemptive aim. Conclusion 1 Corinthians 5:13 unambiguously mandates excommunication of persistently unrepentant sinners. The directive is rooted in covenantal precedent, confirmed by the unanimous manuscript tradition, harmonized with Jesus’ own instructions, practiced by the early church, and justified by coherent theological, pastoral, and behavioral reasoning. |
    |