Evidence for 1 Cor 6:14's accuracy?
What evidence supports the historical accuracy of 1 Corinthians 6:14?

Text

“By His power God raised the Lord from the dead, and He will raise us also.” — 1 Corinthians 6:14


Patristic Citation and Early Versions

Irenaeus, Against Heresies 5.7.2, quotes it verbatim; Tertullian, On the Resurrection of the Flesh 18, appeals to it against gnostics; Origen, Commentary on Romans 5.10, cites it as Pauline. These citations pre-date the Council of Nicaea by more than a century, demonstrating the verse’s circulation and theological weight.


Authorship and Dating of 1 Corinthians

1 Corinthians is universally assigned to Paul by Clement of Rome (1 Clem 47:1-3, A.D. 95), Polycarp (Philippians 11:2), and Ignatius (Ephesians 18:1). Internal indicators (Acts 18; references to Aquila and Priscilla, 1 Corinthians 16:19) place the letter in the spring of A.D. 55 ± 1 year. The Gallio inscription at Delphi fixes Paul’s Corinthian ministry to A.D. 51-52, anchoring the letter within a few years of its stated setting.


Archaeological Corroboration of Corinth

• Gallio Inscription: “Lucius Junius Gallio, my friend, was proconsul of Achaia” (Delphi, dated Claudius 25-26th acclamation, A.D. 51). Aligns with Acts 18:12 and confirms the timeframe in which Paul wrote to the Corinthian church.

• Erastus Inscription: “Erastus, in return for the aedileship, laid this pavement at his own expense” (Corinth, Roman forum). Correlates with “Erastus the city treasurer” (Romans 16:23; 2 Timothy 4:20) and demonstrates the historicity of Paul’s Corinthian contacts.

• Synagogue lintel fragments and the bēma in the agora match Luke’s description (Acts 18:12-17). The geographical accuracy of Acts strengthens confidence in Paul’s letter written to the same city.


Historical Evidence for the Resurrection Referenced in the Verse

1. Early creed of 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 (“delivered… received”) dates to within five years of the crucifixion, affirming that “God raised the Lord” was proclaimed in Jerusalem when eyewitnesses were alive.

2. Empty Tomb: Multiple independent attestations (Mark 16, Matthew 28, Luke 24, John 20) and enemy acknowledgment (“say, ‘His disciples came by night,’” Matthew 28:13) point to a vacated grave.

3. Post-mortem appearances: At least six independent appearance traditions converge (Gospels, Acts, 1 Corinthians 15), including hostile witnesses (Paul, James) transformed by encounters.

4. Explosive growth of the Jerusalem church, documented by Josephus (Ant. 20.200), occurs in the very locale where verification would have been simplest.

5. Martyrdom of primary witnesses: Polycarp (martyred c. A.D. 155) and Ignatius (c. A.D. 110) trace their faith to resurrection-proclaiming apostles; willingness to die is strong behavioral evidence against fabrication.


Miraculous Continuity and Empirical Analogues

Contemporary documented healings (see Craig Keener, Miracles, 2011, vols. 1-2) illustrate ongoing divine power consistent with “by His power God raised the Lord.” Peer-reviewed case reports of instantaneous visual recovery (e.g., Brown & Kulikowski, Southern Medical Journal, 2010) echo the same causative agent Scripture attributes to the resurrection, lending plausibility to Paul’s assertion that the same power will “raise us also.”


Conclusions Drawn from the Evidence

1 Corinthians 6:14 rests on an exceptionally solid manuscript base, enjoys continuous patristic citation, is embedded in a well-dated Pauline letter corroborated by archaeology, fits seamlessly into the wider biblical canon, and invokes a resurrection event supported by multiple, early, independent lines of historical data. The convergence of textual, archaeological, behavioral, and theological evidence establishes the verse’s historical accuracy beyond reasonable doubt.

How does 1 Corinthians 6:14 affirm the belief in bodily resurrection?
Top of Page
Top of Page