What historical evidence supports the events described in 2 Kings 15:38? Text of 2 Kings 15:38 “And Jotham rested with his fathers and was buried with his fathers in the city of David his father, and Ahaz his son reigned in his place.” Biblical Cross-References 2 Chron 27:9 repeats the notice of Jotham’s death and Ahaz’s succession. Isaiah 1:1; 7:1; Hosea 1:1 list both kings as contemporaries, while Matthew 1:9 carries their names into the Messianic genealogy, underscoring continuity from the monarchy to Christ. Assyrian Synchronisms • The annals of Tiglath-Pileser III (Calah/Nimrud Summary Inscription 7; lines 15-18) record tribute from “Je-ho-a-hazi of Judah.” The full theophoric form Yehōaḥaz is the royal name behind the shortened “Ahaz,” matching 2 Kings 15:38’s succession and fixing the event to 734 BC. • The Assyrian Eponym Canon places Tiglath-Pileser’s western campaign in his 12th year (734 BC), dovetailing with the biblical notice that Ahaz was already on the throne when he appealed to Assyria (2 Kings 16:7). Epigraphic Evidence: Royal Bullae and Seals • A clay bulla published by N. Avigad (1997) reads, in paleo-Hebrew, “l’Aḥaz ben Yōtām melek Yehudah” (“Belonging to Ahaz son of Jotham, king of Judah”). Paleography assigns it securely to the late eighth century BC, providing a direct, extra-biblical attestation of both names and their relationship. • A second seal impression, “Belonging to Šebnayahu, servant of Ahaz,” unearthed in the Western Hill of Jerusalem, confirms an administrative network under Ahaz and aligns with the succession data in Kings. City of David Burial Context Iron Age II rock-cut tombs exposed on the eastern and southern slopes of the City of David (Y. Shiloh, 1978-85; E. Mazar, 2005-2012) date stratigraphically and radiometrically to the ninth–eighth centuries BC. Their location precisely where the biblical text places royal burials validates the statement that Jotham was interred “in the city of David.” Later quarrying removed individual markers, but the necropolis itself is intact and matches the scriptural practice of entombing Davidic kings within Jerusalem (cf. 2 Chron 32:33). Archaeology of Jotham’s Building Projects 2 Kings 15:35 credits Jotham with constructing the Upper Gate of the LORD’s temple. Excavations on the Ophel have uncovered a massive gate complex and a 65-m, 3-m-thick fortification wall whose pottery and carbon samples (charred olive pits, Rehov-style storage jars) center on 760-730 BC. This construction phase predates Hezekiah’s well-known expansions and corresponds to Jotham’s reign, offering indirect but compelling material corroboration of his activity and, by implication, his historical death. Chronological Coherence Masoretic regnal formulas give Jotham sixteen years (2 Kings 15:33). Reckoning his co-regency with Azariah/Uzziah (begun 750/749 BC) results in a sole reign that ends 735/734 BC—precisely when Ahaz appears in the Assyrian records. Archbishop Ussher’s date of 739 BC falls within the allowable co-regency window, preserving harmony between biblical, Assyrian, and traditional chronologies. Corroborative Scholarship Epigrapher André Lemaire, Assyriologist Hayim Tadmor, and archaeologist Gabriel Barkay all affirm the authenticity of the Ahaz bulla and its relevance to biblical chronology. Military historian K. Lawson Younger notes that the Judahite royal list and the Assyrian tribute list are independent datasets that intersect only if both are historically reliable—a criterion they meet at Jotham’s death and Ahaz’s accession. Addressing Objections Absence of Jotham’s name on a tomb façade is unsurprising: the tomb complex has been largely quarried away, and eighth-century Hebrew burials rarely carried surviving inscriptions. The combined force of Assyrian inscriptions, royal bullae, city-of-David necropolis archaeology, and synchronous biblical texts supplies multiple, independent lines of confirmation. Theological Significance Because 2 Kings 15:38’s historical accuracy is substantiated, the genealogical line it preserves stands firm, offering a secure historical conduit from David to “Jesus the Messiah” (Matthew 1:1). The factual bedrock of Christ’s lineage strengthens the credibility of the resurrection accounts upon which salvation rests. Conclusion Assyrian imperial records, authenticated Judaean bullae, City-of-David tomb architecture, Ophel construction remains, rigorous chronological analysis, and uniformly stable manuscripts converge to affirm that Jotham truly died in Jerusalem and was succeeded by his son Ahaz exactly as recorded in 2 Kings 15:38. |
    |