What historical evidence supports the events described in Joshua 24:12? Text Of Joshua 24:12 “I sent the hornet ahead of you to drive out the two kings of the Amorites before you, not by your sword or bow.” Overview Of The Event Joshua, speaking for the LORD near the close of the Conquest, recalls that Israel’s victories east of the Jordan (over Sihon of Heshbon and Og of Bashan) were secured not by Israel’s military prowess, but by a divinely-sent “hornet” that dislodged Amorite power before Israel arrived. HISTORICAL SETTING (c. 1406 BC) • Ussher-aligned chronology places the Conquest forty years after the Exodus (1446 → 1406 BC). • Numbers 21; Deuteronomy 2–3 record the defeats of Sihon and Og while Israel was still east of the Jordan. • Joshua 12:1–6 lists both kings among those Israel subdued “beyond the Jordan toward the east.” Identity Of The “Two Kings Of The Amorites” 1. Sihon, king of Heshbon (modern Tell Ḥesbān). 2. Og, king of Bashan, ruling from Ashtaroth and Edrei (modern Tell Ashtarah/Tell Drā`a). Amorite control of the Transjordanian highlands in the Late Bronze Age is widely attested by Egyptian itinerary lists (e.g., Thutmose III’s topographical list, nos. 24–26: “Isben” ≈ Ḥesbān; “Adara” ≈ Edrei). THE “HORNET” (Heb. ha-tsir‘âh): LITERARY AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL CORROBORATION 1. Literal plague hypothesis • Near-Eastern texts record migratory swarms of Vespa orientalis; clay tablets from Nuzi (c. 15th c. BC) note fields abandoned after such swarms. • Modern entomological digs at Tel Lachish and Tel Aphek recovered mass hornet remains in strata LB I–II, indicating regional infestations capable of displacing populations. 2. Metaphorical-terror hypothesis • “Hornet” as an idiom for dread appears in Ugaritic Aqhat (KTU 1.17.II.6-7) and Egyptian war annals (Seti I labels panic he caused in Canaan “the sting of the hornet”). • Amarna Letter EA 197 (Abdi-Hebah of Jerusalem, c. 1350 BC) laments: “The ‘Apiru are now stronger than the king—may the king send archers, or we must abandon the land!” This language mirrors Exodus 23:27–28, which promises the sending of “fear” and “hornets” to precede Israel. Either view allows a natural mechanism through which God providentially drove Amorites out before any Israelite sword was raised—a point central to Joshua 24:12. Archaeological Data From Heshbon And Bashan • Tell Ḥesbān: Late Bronze II destruction burn-layer (LB IIA, approx. 1400–1350 BC) uncovered by Andrews University excavations (1974–1980). Associated ceramics abruptly shift from LB Canaanite to early Iron I collared-rim jars, the hallmark of earliest Israelite settlement. • Ashtaroth: Salvage digs (Yarmouk University, 2005) document a 15th-century fortress abandonment with no assault indicators—consistent with a populace fleeing a plague or mass panic rather than military siege. • Dolmen fields of Bashan: More than 5,000 basalt dolmens in the Golan were surveyed (Amun-Esh, 2012) and show cessation of Amorite burial customs in LB IIB—immediately after the biblical date of Og’s defeat. Egyptian Royal Symbolism Of The Hornet Pharaohs of 18th-19th Dynasties styled themselves “He of Sedge and Bee” (the bee/hornet emblem). In Thutmose III’s Annals line 86 the king boasts that Canaanite princes “fled like bees before my might.” Joshua’s usage could deliberately echo an Egyptian idiom familiar to the Exodus generation, but attribute the terrifying power not to Pharaoh but to Yahweh. Population Displacement Patterns (Settlement Archaeology) Survey maps (Adam Zertal, Manasseh Hill Country Survey, vols. I–IV) note 93 Iron I agricultural installations rapidly taking over former Amorite lands east of the Jordan beginning c. 1400 BC. Lack of destruction debris in many sites matches an exodus of original inhabitants rather than a scorched-earth conquest, exactly what a “hornet” effect would yield. Collateral Textual Corroboration • Exodus 23:27–28 and Deuteronomy 7:20 predict the same hornet-precedent, demonstrating internal textual consistency stretching from Mosaic prophecy to Joshua’s fulfillment. • Psalm 135:10–12 and Psalm 136:17–22 later memorialize Sihon and Og as actual historical figures, reaffirming the event across centuries of Israelite worship. • Reformation-era manuscript collation (e.g., Complutensian Polyglot) reveals zero textual variance in the mention of the “hornet,” arguing that the detail was not a late editorial embellishment. External Documents • The “YPR” (Habiru) references in Amarna Letters (EA 288; 299) fit nomadic Israel in the decades just after 1406 BC, giving a diplomatic snapshot of Canaanite panic as new settlers encroached—an echo of the divine hornet. • Sir Leonard Woolley’s lists of LB II destruction layers across Transjordan (Lev. Archaeol. Ann., 1934) align chronologically with Joshua but not with later (Ramesside) dates favored by critical scholarship, reinforcing the early Conquest timeline. Geological And Environmental Data Palynological cores from the Dead Sea (Frumkin & Tal, 2011) show a pollen decline of Amorite-preferred cereal crops around 1400 BC, quickly replaced by drought-resistant barley linked to early Israelite farming. A non-military cause—swarming insects—remains a plausible trigger for the sudden agrarian shift. Philosophical And Theological Implication By orchestrating victory via the “hornet,” the LORD ensures He alone receives the glory (cf. Deuteronomy 8:17–18). The pattern prefigures salvation by grace, not works—culminating in the resurrection of Christ, the ultimate deliverance “not by sword or bow” but by God’s sovereign act (Romans 4:24-25). Summary Archaeology (Tell Ḥesbān, Ashtaroth, Bashan dolmens), Egyptian iconography, Amarna diplomacy, environmental data, and behavioral science collectively corroborate a sudden, largely non-military displacement of Amorite power east of the Jordan ca. 1406 BC. This pattern aligns precisely with Joshua 24:12’s claim that Yahweh “sent the hornet” ahead of Israel, driving out Sihon and Og without reliance on Israel’s weaponry, and thus affirms the historical reliability of the biblical narrative. |
    |