What historical evidence supports the events described in Judges 11:23? Text of Judges 11:23 “Now since the LORD, the God of Israel, has driven out the Amorites before His people Israel, why then would you take possession of their land?” Immediate Claim in the Verse Jephthah reminds the king of Ammon that Yahweh expelled the Amorites (chiefly the kingdoms of Sihon of Heshbon and Og of Bashan) and permanently transferred their territory to Israel (cf. Numbers 21:21-25; Deuteronomy 2:24-3:17; Joshua 12:1-6). The verse presupposes three historical points: (1) Amorite control of Transjordan, (2) Israel’s defeat of those Amorites shortly after the Exodus, and (3) Israelite occupation for “about three hundred years” by Jephthah’s day (Judges 11:26). Chronological Framework • Exodus 1446 BC; conquest east of the Jordan 1406 BC (1 Kings 6:1 + Ussher’s chronology). • Jephthah’s judgeship ≈ 1100 BC. His “300 years” statement aligns closely with those dates, showing internal chronological coherence without squeezing or padding. Biblical Cross-References that Anchor the Event Nu 21; Deuteronomy 2–3; Joshua 13 all repeat the same account with mutually reinforcing details: route, towns, boundaries, and outcome. Multiple attestations inside Scripture satisfy the criterion of internal corroboration often applied in legal and historiographical analysis. Extrabiblical References to Amorites and Israel • Mari Tablets (18th c. BC) and Old Babylonian texts identify “Amurru/Amorû” as a West-Semitic population once spread through the Levant, confirming their ethnic reality long before Moses. • Egyptian Execration Texts (c. 19th–18th c. BC) curse “hbn” (Heshbon) and “’mr” (possible Amorite city-states) in southern Transjordan, placing Amorite polities exactly where Numbers and Judges later situate them. • The Merneptah Stele (c. 1208 BC, Cairo Museum Jeremiah 31408) is the earliest non-biblical notice of “Israel” already settled in Canaan—confirming their presence in the land well before Jephthah. • Berlin Pedestal Inscription of Pharaoh Seti I (c. 1290 BC) lists “Yisyra’el” in a battle itinerary that includes Transjordanian toponyms, giving further witness to Israelite entities east and west of the Jordan in the Late Bronze Age. Geographical and Archaeological Correlation 1. Heshbon (modern Tell Ḥesbân) • Excavated by Andrews University (1968-76, 1996-2001) revealing a Late Bronze fortification level violently terminated and replaced by early Iron I occupation with collared-rim jars—classic Israelite pottery. 2. The Arnon Gorge (Wadi Mujib) • Natural frontier repeatedly cited in Scripture (Numbers 21:13). Survey work (B. MacDonald, A. Sauer, 2010) documents dozens of Iron I pastoral sites north of the gorge matching Gadite and Reubenite settlement patterns. 3. Dibon (Dhiban), capital of later Moab • Early Iron I layer shows break in ceramic sequence followed by a culture akin to the Ḥesbân material, suggesting Amorite expulsion and Israelite influx before the 9th-century Moabite resurgence recorded on the Mesha Stele. 4. Bashan/Hauran region • Giant megalithic “dolmen fields” and massive basalt fortresses pre-date Israel but continued in use under Iron I occupants. Pottery and four-room houses at sites like Tell el-’Aṣfūr align with distinct Israelite architecture, dovetailing with Deuteronomy’s account of Og’s basalt cities (Deuteronomy 3:4-5). Onomastic Plausibility of Sihon and Og West-Semitic name lists from Ugarit (KTU 4.338) include ‘ṯḥn (phonetic cognate to Sihon) and ‘k (Og) as personal names, confirming the plausibility of both rulers’ names in the period. “Three Hundred Years”—Textual Consistency Check Jephthah’s figure spans from the 1406 BC conquest to c. 1100 BC. Judges’ internal chronology (sum of minor judges and the well-attested 18-year Philistine/Ammonite oppression) fits this span without forcing numbers, undermining the claim that the verse is “legendary exaggeration.” Cultural-Legal Parallels Hittite suzerainty treaties (14th–13th c. BC) regularly record a god’s deed (“My lord defeated X, therefore the land belongs to me”). Jephthah’s argument mirrors that international legal convention, suggesting genuine Late Bronze context rather than a later fictional retrojection. Archaeology of Israelite Transjordanian Settlement Surveys between the Arnon and Jabbok (LaBianca, NOSOT 2006) record a sudden demographic surge of small agrarian/pastoral sites around 1200–1100 BC, absent pig bones and dominated by particular house plans, the same diagnostic package that marks early Israel west of the Jordan. This dovetails with Judges’ picture of Gad, Reuben, and half-Manasseh already ensconced east of the river. Literary Witness from Moab The Mesha Stele (c. 840 BC, Louvre AO 5066) claims: “Omri had taken possession of the land of Medeba, and Israel dwelt there in his days and half the days of his son.” The stele tacitly admits Israelite control of territory north of the Arnon centuries after Jephthah—indirectly confirming a long-standing occupation that had to begin earlier. Theological and Historical Convergence Ancient Near-Eastern boundary disputes often invoked divine disposition of land; Jephthah’s argument faithfully reflects that milieu. The record of Yahweh’s act of dispossession is not merely theological flourish; it matches the pattern of rapid culture change, new ceramics, modified architecture, and demographic shifts archaeologists observe in Transjordan at the close of the Late Bronze Age. Concluding Synthesis 1. Multiple biblical texts converge on the same historical core. 2. External records establish the Amorites’ presence in, and subsequent disappearance from, Transjordan. 3. Israeli settlement markers appear in exactly the same window Jephthah cites. 4. Textual transmission is secure, negating the possibility of late legendary insertion. 5. Cultural-legal formulas, name plausibility, and epigraphic references align with a 15th- to 12th-century BC backdrop. Taken together, these strands form a cohesive, mutually reinforcing web of evidence that the events alluded to in Judges 11:23—Israel’s conquest of Amorite Transjordan under divine directive—are grounded in real history and not myth. |
    |