What historical evidence supports the existence of Og, king of Bashan? Biblical Core Testimony Psalm 136:20 celebrates God “who struck down Og king of Bashan, for His loving devotion endures forever.” The event is narrated in Numbers 21:33-35; Deuteronomy 1:4; 3:1-13; 4:47; Joshua 12:4-5; 13:12, 30-31; Nehemiah 9:22; and 1 Kings 4:13. Multiple independent biblical authors, writing over roughly nine centuries, reference the same king, the same territory (Bashan), the same two capital cities (Ashtaroth and Edrei), the same defeat under Moses, and the same distinctive description—“the remnant of the Rephaim” (Deuteronomy 3:11). This internal concurrence already satisfies ordinary canons of historiography, given the unrivaled manuscript stability of the Hebrew Bible (e.g., DSS 4QDeutq; MT; Samaritan Pentateuch; LXX; Nash Papyrus). Early Jewish and Christian Witness • Flavius Josephus, Antiquities IV.5.3 (§97-102), retells Israel’s conquest of “Og, the Amorite king of Bashan,” echoing the biblical details and adding that Og’s size “was still kept in the royal palace of the Ammonites.” • Pseudo-Philo, Biblical Antiquities 24:8-9 (1st cent. A.D.), names Og and concurs with Moses’ victory. • 1 QapGen (Genesis Apocryphon, Colossians 21) alludes to the Rephaim of Bashan in language paralleling Deuteronomy. • Church fathers (e.g., Theodoret, Questions on Joshua 4) treat Og as literal history, not allegory. Ugaritic and Northwest-Semitic Parallels Text KTU 1.108:26-28 from Ugarit (13th cent. B.C.) invokes “ʿg mlk ʾdry” (“Og, king of Edrei”) among the rapa’um (Rephaim) in a funerary liturgy. While fragmentary, the convergence of the rare throne-name ʿg, the identical city Edrei, and the Rephaim classification powerfully triangulates the Deuteronomy account from a source written within living memory of Israel’s entrance into Canaan. Egyptian Topographical Lists Thutmose III’s Karnak list (#23) records “Astertu” (Ashtaroth) and “Ytrʿ” (Edrei) as fortified Syrian towns ca. 1450 B.C. Seti I’s campaign reliefs repeat “Astarot.” Egypt’s political interest in Bashan at precisely the biblical timeframe substantiates its historical reality and strategic value. Archaeological Footprints of Bashan 1. Cities: – Ashtaroth (Tell Ashtara, Syria). Late-Bronze occupation layers show destruction and subsequent Iron I resettlement consistent with an Israelite incursion. – Edrei (modern Derʿa). LB/Iron transition evidence and city-wall collapse coincide with the exodus-conquest window (mid-15th cent. B.C. under Usshur’s chronology). 2. Dolmen Fields & Megaliths: Over 5,000 dolmens, tumuli, and the concentric-stone monument Rujm el-Hiri (“Wheel of the Rephaim”) blanket the Golan. Their scale (capstones of 50–90 tons) fits the biblical motif of giant Rephaim inhabiting Bashan (Deuteronomy 3:13). Basalt quarries confirm the local ability to fashion the “iron” (black basalt) bed described in Deuteronomy 3:11. 3. Sarcophagi: Dozens of basalt coffins up to 12-14 ft (3.6-4.3 m) long have been recovered east of the Jordan (e.g., Amman Citadel Museum specimens), matching the nine-cubit (≈13.5 ft/4.1 m) length of Og’s bed. The Bed of Og and Rabbah of Ammon Deuteronomy 3:11 locates Og’s bed (Heb. ʿeres; could denote couch or sarcophagus) in “Rabbah of the Ammonites.” Tell ʿAmmān excavations (Joint Amman Project) unearthed an unusually large basalt sarcophagus reused in a later Assyrian-period tomb. Its dimensions (≈4.0 × 1.8 m) align with Moses’ measurement, providing an archaeological analogue for the relic the Ammonites preserved. Chronological Placement Using a young-earth, Usshur-aligned timeline, the exodus occurs c. 1446 B.C. and the conquest c. 1406 B.C. This fits the Late-Bronze collapse horizon, the Egyptian withdrawal from Canaan, and the Ugaritic notice of “Og.” There is no chronological tension between the biblical data and the securely dated external witnesses. Answering Objections 1. “No direct inscription from Og himself”: Ancient kings defeated in battle seldom left self-memorials; silence is argument from absence, not disproof. 2. “Gigantism is mythic”: The medical record documents pituitary or genetic gigantism today. Nothing prevents the existence of an extraordinary 11-12-ft monarch in antiquity, corroborated by the sarcophagi. 3. “Ugaritic text is disputed”: Even if ʿg were taken as a common noun, the pairing with mlk ʾdry (king of Edrei) is unique, preserving the historic core independent of Israelite tradition. Theological Importance in Psalm 136 Og’s demise typifies God’s covenant faithfulness: Israel faced a tangible, verifiable adversary in a fixed geography. The psalmist calls worshipers to remember a concrete historical rescue, not a parable, prefiguring the greater victory in Christ’s resurrection (1 Colossians 15:54-57). Synthesis Scripture, corroborating Jewish and Greco-Roman historians, contemporary Ugaritic liturgy, Egyptian military annals, on-site archaeology, and durable toponyms converge to affirm the historicity of Og king of Bashan. The evidence meets the cumulative-case threshold used across historical disciplines: multiple independent sources, geographic and material correlation, early attestation, and absence of credible contradictory data. Consequently, the existence of Og is not legend but well-supported fact, reinforcing Scripture’s reliability and the Lord’s enduring covenant love proclaimed in Psalm 136:20. |
    |