How does "eye for eye" in Exodus 21:24 relate to justice today? Setting the Verse in Context Exodus 21 records God’s civil laws for Israel immediately after the Ten Commandments. Verse 24 states: “eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot”. These words deal with legal restitution, not private pay-back. They outline how a judge should sentence wrongdoers so that punishment matches harm. The Heart of “Eye for Eye” in the Mosaic Law • Proportionality—no excessive penalties. • Equality—rich and poor judged by the same standard. • Deterrence—public awareness that crime carries an exact cost. • Mercy protected—because penalties were fixed, personal vengeance was curbed. Compare: Leviticus 24:19-20; Deuteronomy 19:21. Each restates the rule to guide courts, not individual retaliation. Principle of Proportional Justice for Today • Civil governments still bear “the sword” (Romans 13:4). • Courts must weigh evidence and impose sentences that fit the harm—nothing lighter, nothing harsher. • Victims deserve restoration; offenders must accept consequences. • When laws drift toward either cruelty or leniency, the timeless rule of Exodus 21:24 calls societies back to balance. Guardrails Against Personal Vengeance • “Do not say, ‘I will repay evil’; wait for the LORD” (Proverbs 20:22). • Romans 12:17-19 urges believers to leave retribution to God and lawful authorities. • Thus, the verse never authorizes private revenge; instead, it pushes personal anger out of the picture and channels justice through proper channels. Christ’s Fulfillment, Not Abolition Jesus quoted the statute: “You have heard that it was said, ‘Eye for eye and tooth for tooth.’ But I tell you, not to resist an evil person” (Matthew 5:38-39). • He addressed personal conduct, calling His followers to forgo retaliation. • He did not nullify government’s duty to punish crime (Matthew 22:21; Romans 13:1-4). • Grace does not erase justice; it empowers believers to respond to personal offense with forgiveness while still valuing lawful punishment for wrongdoing. Practical Implications in Modern Society • Legislators—craft penalties that reflect the seriousness of the offense. • Judges—apply sentences consistently, without favoritism. • Citizens—support laws that uphold both justice and mercy (Micah 6:8). • Victim-offender mediation—encourages restitution, aligning with the restorative impulse behind Exodus 21. • Churches—model forgiveness yet never excuse abuse; they may involve authorities when crimes occur (1 Peter 2:13-14). Implications for the Church Community • Church discipline seeks restoration, mirroring proportional justice (Galatians 6:1). • Believers refuse personal revenge, entrusting judgment to God and the state. • The body of Christ advocates for fair courts, humane prisons, and protection of the vulnerable. Conclusion “Eye for eye” remains a God-given benchmark: justice must be measured, equitable, and administered by rightful authority. Personally, we practice forgiveness; publicly, we uphold proportional justice—two sides of the same Scriptural coin, both vital for reflecting God’s righteous character in today’s world. |
    |