Does Exodus 9:35 suggest predestination or free will in Pharaoh's actions? Text And Context Exodus 9:35 reads: “So Pharaoh’s heart was hardened, and he would not let the Israelites go, just as the LORD had declared to Moses.” The verse concludes the seventh plague (hail) and echoes the divine forecast given in Exodus 4:21; 7:3. The hardening motif spans Exodus 4–14, appearing twenty times—ten times attributing the act to Yahweh (e.g., 4:21; 9:12; 10:20), ten times to Pharaoh himself or stated impersonally (e.g., 8:15; 9:34; 13:15). The literary design urges the reader to hold both strands together. Divine Sovereignty Foretold Before Moses ever returned to Egypt, Yahweh declared: “I will harden his heart so that he will not let the people go” (4:21). These forestatements anchor the plague narrative in God’s redemptive plan. The consistency between prediction and outcome (“just as the LORD had declared”) underlines divine sovereignty. The pattern anticipates Paul’s citation, “For this very purpose I raised you up” (Romans 9:17). Pharaoh’S Personal Agency Exodus also records Pharaoh actively hardening his own heart: “But when Pharaoh saw that there was relief, he hardened his heart” (8:15). After the hail, “Pharaoh sinned again and hardened his heart” (9:34)—immediately prior to v. 35. Scripture therefore portrays Pharaoh making morally culpable decisions. No verse lessens that responsibility; Exodus 10:16 shows him confessing, “I have sinned.” Progressive, Reciprocal Hardening A sequential reading reveals: 1. Early plagues—Pharaoh hardens his heart (7:13; 8:15). 2. Mid-plagues—dual wording (9:7, 34–35). 3. Later plagues—Yahweh hardens Pharaoh (10:20, 27; 11:10; 14:8). This progression suggests that persistent rebellion invites judicial hardening—a principle echoed in Isaiah 6:9-10 and Romans 1:24-28 (“God gave them over”). Divine action is thus partly retributive, not arbitrary. Compatibilism In Scripture Exodus presents a compatibilist paradigm: God’s decrees and human choices coexist without contradiction. Joseph’s summary of earlier events captures the model: “You meant evil… but God meant it for good” (Genesis 50:20). In Acts 2:23 both divine plan (“predetermined”) and human agency (“you… crucified”) operate in the crucifixion. Therefore, Exodus 9:35 reinforces the biblical pattern that God’s sovereign purpose and creaturely freedom function concurrently. Apostolic Interpretation Paul, writing to a mixed Jewish-Gentile audience steeped in Exodus lore, cites Pharaoh to assert God’s right to show mercy or harden (Romans 9:17-18). Yet the same epistle upholds human accountability (Romans 1:20; 2:5). Paul does not pit predestination against responsibility; he assumes both. Purpose In Redemptive History Yahweh’s stated aim: “that My name may be proclaimed in all the earth” (Exodus 9:16). The hardening episodes magnify divine power, vindicate His justice, and prefigure the Passover—foreshadowing Christ’s atoning work (1 Corinthians 5:7). Archaeological corroborations (e.g., the Merneptah Stele, ca. 1208 BC, recording “Israel” in Canaan within a timespan consistent with a 15th-century Exodus) affirm the historic framework in which God’s purposes unfolded. Implications For The Predestination–Free-Will Debate 1. Predestination: Exodus 9:35 fulfills previously revealed intent; nothing thwarts divine decree. 2. Free will: Pharaoh sins willingly, understanding consequences, and is judged for self-chosen obstinacy. 3. Compatibility: Scripture offers no hint that divine causation coerces Pharaoh contrary to his desires; rather, God gives him over to those desires. Pastoral Application Believers can trust that God’s sovereign plans incorporate, without violation, genuine decisions. Unbelievers are warned: persistent rejection can result in hardening. The remedy is humble repentance (Hebrews 3:13-15). Conclusion Exodus 9:35, far from forcing an either-or choice, affirms both God’s predestinating sovereignty and Pharaoh’s accountable free agency. The verse sits within a narrative, canonical, and theological tapestry that weaves divine foreordination with meaningful human choice—each strand fully intact, each glorifying God. |
    |