How does Genesis 14:20 support the practice of tithing in Christianity? Historical and Cultural Context Genesis 14 portrays Abram returning from victory over Chedorlaomer and the Mesopotamian coalition. On the plains near Salem (Jerusalem), he meets Melchizedek—both king and priest. Cuneiform archives from Mari (18th century BC) and Alalakh list similar coalition warfare and personal names (e.g., Kudur-Lagamar for Chedorlaomer), situating the narrative firmly in the Middle Bronze Age. In that setting, a voluntary tenth was a recognized symbol of homage to deity mediated through a priest-king (parallels in Ugaritic texts, ca. 13th century BC). Abram’s Tithe to Melchizedek: A Pre-Mosaic Principle Abram’s act predates Sinai by roughly six centuries (cf. Ussher’s 1921 BC for Abram’s battle; 1491 BC for the Exodus). Because the tithe appears before the Law, its theological root is covenantal gratitude, not civic taxation. Abram’s tithe is spontaneous, universal (a tenth “of everything”), and God-directed through His priest. This breaks the common objection that tithing is purely “Old Covenant legislation.” Typological Significance: Melchizedek and Christ Hebrews 7:1-10 identifies Melchizedek as a type of Christ: “For this Melchizedek… resembles the Son of God and remains a priest forever.” (Hebrews 7:3). The inspired writer reasons that because Levi (and thus the Mosaic system) “paid tithes through Abram” (Hebrews 7:9), the tithe transcends the Levitical economy and is therefore relevant under Christ’s higher priesthood. The logic: 1. Greater priest receives the tithe. 2. Christ is the antitype and greater Priest. 3. Therefore His New-Covenant people honor God with the same pattern. Continuation in Mosaic Law Leviticus 27:30 – 32, Numbers 18:21-24, and Deuteronomy 14:22-29 codify the tithe for Israel. Rather than introducing something novel, these statutes regularize Abram’s precedent. The literary weave from Genesis to Torah, demonstrable in the Dead Sea Scrolls (4QGen-Exoda), shows a consistent canonical strand. New Testament Affirmation 1. Jesus acknowledges tithing while condemning legalistic attitudes: “You should have practiced the latter, without neglecting the former” (Matthew 23:23). 2. Early believers channeled resources for gospel ministry (Acts 4:34-37) echoing the storehouse idea (Malachi 3:10). 3. Paul uses priestly language to describe gospel workers living off the offerings of the church (1 Corinthians 9:13-14). Systematic Theology: Covenant Continuity and Discontinuity • Moral principles rooted in God’s character (honor, generosity, dependence) remain unchanged. • Ceremonial specifics of agriculture and Levitical distribution adapt into Spirit-led giving, yet the “first-fruits” ratio still functions as a pedagogical floor, not a ceiling (2 Corinthians 8–9). • The tithe thus operates as creation-grounded, patriarchal, and Christological—three independent but converging lines of authority. Early Church Practice and Patristic Witness The Didache 13, Irenaeus (Against Heresies 4.18.2), and Cyprian (Epistle 65.2) urge proportional giving, often naming the tenth. Archaeological excavations at the 3rd-century Christian village of Kefar ‘Othnay (Nessana papyri) record grain tithes set aside for clergy and the poor, verifying continuity of practice. Practical Implications for Modern Believers 1. Worship: Tithing is an act of thanksgiving, mirroring Abram’s immediate response to divine deliverance. 2. Lordship: Yielding the first tenth acknowledges God’s ownership of 100 percent. 3. Mission: Consistent, proportional giving fuels evangelism, discipleship, and benevolence—modern analogues of Melchizedek’s priestly service. Common Objections Addressed • “Tithing is legalistic.” – Genesis 14 shows grace-based giving pre-Law; Hebrews 7 shows grace-based giving post-Law. • “The NT teaches only freewill offerings.” – 2 Corinthians 9 endorses cheerful giving; it never negates percentage giving, it deepens the heart motive behind it. • “We are not under the curse of Malachi 3.” – True, Christ bears the curse, yet the blessing principle (“windows of heaven,” Malachi 3:10) remains illustrative of God’s economy of trust. Conclusion Genesis 14:20 anchors the tithe in a patriarchal, priestly, and Christ-centered context. Abram’s tenth predates the Law, typifies submission to Christ’s eternal priesthood, and sets a trans-covenantal pattern the New Testament neither abolishes nor diminishes. Therefore, Genesis 14:20 robustly supports the ongoing Christian practice of tithing as a worshipful, faith-filled, and gospel-advancing discipline. |
    |