What does Genesis 34:4 reveal about the treatment of women in biblical narratives? Text of Genesis 34:4 “and Shechem said to his father Hamor, ‘Get me this girl as my wife.’ ” Immediate Narrative Setting Shechem has already “taken” and “humiliated” Dinah (v. 2). Verse 4 records his demand that his father arrange a marriage. The verse is descriptive, not prescriptive; it recounts the behavior of a pagan prince in Canaan, not a command of God. By placing Dinah’s voice entirely absent, the text highlights the inequity inherent in the surrounding culture and sets the stage for the divine-shaped critique that unfolds across Scripture. Patriarchal Customs versus Divine Evaluation 1. Near-Eastern marriage contracts of the Middle Bronze Age (Nuzi tablets; Mari archives) show that fathers negotiated daughters’ marriages as economic alliances. Shechem’s action mirrors that culture. 2. Biblical narrative frequently records cultural practices it does not endorse (cf. polygamy in Genesis 29–30, slavery in Genesis 16). Descriptive narrative is not divine approval (cf. 1 Corinthians 10:6). 3. God’s covenant people are shown interacting with fallen customs before the giving of the Mosaic Law, which will later confront and restrain evil (Deuteronomy 22:25-27). Literary Emphasis on Female Vulnerability Dinah’s name appears seven times in the chapter; yet she speaks zero words. The silence underlines exploitation. The sons of Jacob react, “Should he treat our sister like a prostitute?” (v. 31). Scripture thus frames Shechem’s demand as reprehensible.^1 Progressive Revelation of Protection for Women • Mosaic Law forbids rape and prescribes capital punishment when the victim cannot cry for help (Deuteronomy 22:25-27). • The kinsman-redeemer statutes (Ruth 3–4) and Jesus’ treatment of women (John 4; Luke 10:39; 13:16) correct cultural abuses. • Paul re-situates marriage in mutual devotion and Christ-like love (Ephesians 5:25-33). Comparative Legal Codes Code of Hammurabi §128 treats wives as property of husbands; Hittite Law 197 allows monetary fines for rape. In contrast, Deuteronomy elevates the sanctity of the victim over property concerns, revealing a higher ethic rooted in creation (Genesis 1:27) and covenant. Theological Trajectory toward Redemption 1. The moral outrage of Jacob’s sons foreshadows divine justice that will later be codified in law. 2. Christ bears the violence of sinful humanity (Isaiah 53:5) and grants dignity to the marginalized (Galatians 3:28). 3. Final restoration includes wiping away every tear—including those like Dinah’s (Revelation 21:4). Archaeological Corroboration • Shechem’s city gate and cultic standing stones have been excavated on Tel Balata, confirming a wealthy Canaanite city capable of a princely demand such as v. 4 describes (A. Zertal, 1986). • The destruction layer dating to Middle Bronze II matches the violent aftermath recorded in Genesis 34:25-26, lending historical credibility. Ethical and Pastoral Implications • The passage confronts readers with the reality of sexual violence and challenges believers to defend the vulnerable (Proverbs 31:8-9). • Modern applications include advocating for victims, opposing human trafficking, and modeling Christ-like sacrificial love in relationships. Summary Genesis 34:4 exposes a pagan prince’s commodification of a woman, placing Dinah’s plight in sharp relief. Rather than endorsing such treatment, Scripture records it to display human sin, evoke moral outrage, and prepare the way for God’s progressive revelation that champions the dignity, worth, and protection of women culminating in the work of Christ. ——— ^1 The Hebrew וַיַּעַנֶּהָ (“humiliated her,” v. 2) is the same verb used in Deuteronomy 22:24 for rape, signifying clear condemnation. |
    |