How can we who died to sin still live in it, according to Romans 6:2? Immediate Literary Context Romans 6 stands at the hinge between Paul’s exposition of justification by faith (chs. 1–5) and his call to progressive sanctification (chs. 6–8). Paul has just asked, “Shall we continue in sin so that grace may increase?” (6:1). Verse 2 is his emphatic refutation of any antinomian distortion: grace never licenses lawlessness. The Phrase “Died to Sin” “Died” (Greek aorist, apethanomen) denotes a decisive, completed, once-for-all event, not an ongoing process. At conversion the believer is united with Christ in His death (6:3–5). Sin’s reign as master is legally terminated (cf. Colossians 3:3; 2 Corinthians 5:14–15). The death referenced is forensic (our status before God) and mystical (our spiritual union with Christ), grounding practical transformation. Union with Christ—Paul’s Core Argument 3.1 Judicial Aspect: Christ died under sin’s penalty; by faith we share that verdict met in Him (Galatians 2:20). 3.2 Vital Aspect: Christ was raised; we share His resurrection life (6:4–5). 3.3 Covenantal Aspect: Baptism serves as the outward sign sealing this union (6:3–4), paralleling Israel’s Red Sea “baptism” into Moses (1 Corinthians 10:2). “Live in It Any Longer”: The Logical Impossibility Paul’s rhetorical question does not suggest sinless perfection but categorical incompatibility. It is akin to asking, “How can a freed slave still wear the shackles?” The indicative (“died”) grounds the imperative (“do not let sin reign,” v. 12). Persisting in sin would contradict the believer’s new identity (Ephesians 4:20–24). Supporting Scriptural Witness • 1 Peter 2:24—We died to sins to live for righteousness. • 1 John 3:9—God’s seed abides; habitual sin is incongruous. • Titus 2:11–14—Grace trains us to deny ungodliness. Scripture’s self-consistency reveals sanctification as the necessary fruit of justification. Early Manuscript Corroboration Romans 6:2 appears verbatim in P46 (c. AD 180–200), Codex Vaticanus (B), and Codex Sinaiticus (ℵ). The textual certainty underscores that this teaching is not a later ecclesial addition but authentic Pauline doctrine. Theological Implications 7.1 Regeneration: The Holy Spirit indwells, imparting new desires (Romans 8:9). 7.2 Dominion Transfer: From Adamic realm to Christ’s kingdom (Colossians 1:13). 7.3 Eschatological Tension: We await glorification, so struggle persists (Romans 7), but the decisive victory is secured. Practical Outworking • Mortify residual sin (Romans 8:13). • Present members as instruments of righteousness (6:13). • Engage in accountable community (Hebrews 10:24–25). • Preach the gospel to oneself, reinforcing the indicative that fuels the imperative. Common Objections Answered OBJECTION: “Christians still sin; therefore, they haven’t ‘died to sin.’” REPLY: Paul addresses indwelling sin (Romans 7:17) but distinguishes regime (dominion) from presence. A defeated tyrant may skirmish; he no longer rules. OBJECTION: “If grace abounds, why fear relapse?” REPLY: Grace not only pardons but empowers (Titus 2:12). Continued rebellion evidences an unregenerate heart (1 John 2:19). Pastoral Application Assure doubters of their new identity; exhort strugglers to rely on Spirit-empowered disciplines. Remind the congregation that holiness is not meritorious but the inevitable trajectory of resurrection life. Summary Because believers have been united with Christ in His death, sin’s legal claim is nullified and its power broken. Living in ongoing, unrepentant sin contradicts the very essence of Christian identity. Romans 6:2 thus grounds an ethic of transformative holiness, proclaiming the logical, theological, and experiential impossibility of remaining in the sin from which we have been decisively freed. |
    |