Is God self-sufficient in Romans 11:35?
Does Romans 11:35 suggest that God is self-sufficient and independent from creation?

Canonical Text

“Who has first given to God, that God should repay?” (Romans 11:35)


Immediate Context

Romans 11:33-36 forms a doxology capping Paul’s exposition of God’s redemptive plan for Israel and the nations. Verses 33-34 extol God’s unsearchable wisdom; verse 35 cites Job 41:11a, rhetorically denying that anyone can place God in his debt; verse 36 concludes, “For from Him and through Him and to Him are all things. To Him be the glory forever! Amen” . Together the statements assert divine aseity—God’s existence and sufficiency in Himself—while stressing creation’s total dependence.


Exegetical Notes

• “Who has first given” (proedōken) employs an aorist active indicative: no past, present, or future act can precede God’s initiative.

• “That God should repay” (antapodoθήsetai) is future middle indicative: God is never obligated to return favors; any divine “recompense” flows from grace, not debt.


Old Testament Intertext

Job 41:11 (LXX 40:3): “Who has first given to Me that I should repay him? Everything under heaven belongs to Me” . Paul lifts the line verbatim, rooting his argument in Yahweh’s self-attestation. The Job context describes God’s sovereign mastery over Leviathan—symbol of chaotic forces—underscoring that even the most formidable creature owes its existence to God alone.


Aseity and Independence Defined

Aseity (from Latin a se, “from oneself”) refers to God’s self-existence: He is uncaused, underived, and lacks nothing (Exodus 3:14; John 5:26). Independence extends the truth: creation contributes nothing essential to God’s being, knowledge, power, or blessedness (Psalm 50:10-12; Acts 17:24-25).


Cross-Textual Witness

Psalm 50:12 – “If I were hungry, I would not tell you, for the world is Mine, and the fullness thereof.”

Isaiah 40:13-14 – “Who has directed the Spirit of the LORD, or informed Him…?” quoted in Romans 11:34.

Acts 17:24-25 – God “is not served by human hands, as if He needed anything.”

Colossians 1:16-17 – “All things were created through Him and for Him… in Him all things hold together.”

Revelation 4:11 – Creation exists “by Your will.”

These passages corroborate that Romans 11:35 affirms divine self-sufficiency.


Systematic-Theological Implications

1. Ontological Self-Existence: God’s being is non-contingent (John 1:3).

2. Creator-Creature Distinction: All finite reality derives its existence from God (Genesis 1:1; Nehemiah 9:6).

3. Grace, Not Obligation: Salvation is gratuitous (Ephesians 2:8-9). Were God indebted, grace would no longer be grace (Romans 11:6).

4. Divine Freedom: God’s will is never constrained by external necessity (Daniel 4:35).


Historical-Theological Affirmation

Augustine (Confessions 1.5): “In Yourself You are complete and need nothing.” Aquinas (ST I.3.1): “God is His own existence.” Reformers codified aseity in the Westminster Confession (2.2). The perennial consensus aligns with Paul’s words.


Philosophical and Behavioral Ramifications

If God is independent, human significance rests not in adding to God but in glorifying Him (1 Corinthians 10:31). Dependence invites humility, gratitude, and worship rather than self-reliance. Psychologically, recognition of an ultimate, self-sufficient Source provides existential security, anchoring moral norms.


Practical Application

• Worship: Praise centers on God’s intrinsic worth, not transactional benefit.

• Stewardship: All possessions are trusts from the self-sufficient Owner (1 Chron 29:14).

• Prayer: Requests appeal to divine generosity, not compulsion (Matthew 7:11).

• Evangelism: Salvation is offered freely; none can merit it (Titus 3:5).


Conclusion

Romans 11:35, framed by its Jobian citation and Paul’s doxology, unequivocally teaches God’s self-sufficiency and independence from creation. Every ontological, theological, and practical thread of Scripture harmonizes with this truth: God needs nothing; creation needs Him for everything.

How does Romans 11:35 challenge the concept of human merit in salvation?
Top of Page
Top of Page