Does Romans 7:7 suggest the law is sinful? Immediate Context (Romans 7:1-13) Paul has just illustrated that believers “died to the Law through the body of Christ” (7:4) and have been “released from the Law” (7:6). Lest his readers draw the false inference that the Torah itself is evil, he now poses a rhetorical question. The Greek μὴ γένοιτο (“Absolutely not!”) is the strongest possible negative; it presupposes the answer “No!” (cf. Romans 3:4, 6, 31). Paul’s View of the Law Elsewhere • Romans 7:12 – “So then, the Law is holy, and the commandment is holy, righteous, and good.” • Romans 3:31 – “Do we, then, nullify the Law by this faith? Absolutely not! Instead, we uphold the Law.” • 1 Timothy 1:8 – “We know that the Law is good if one uses it lawfully.” Theological Function of the Law 1. Revealer of Sin: “Through the Law we become conscious of sin” (Romans 3:20). 2. Provoker of Sin (Romans 7:8), not by moral defect in the Law but by the rebellious nature of fallen humanity. 3. Tutor to Christ: “The Law became our guardian to lead us to Christ” (Galatians 3:24). 4. Standard of Good: Psalm 19:7; 119:97, 165 affirm its perfection and delight. Illustration: The Mirror Analogy A flawless mirror reveals dirt on the face; the mirror is not dirty, nor does it cause the dirt. In behavioral terms, clear moral norms heighten self-awareness, triggering cognitive dissonance that drives change. The Law performs precisely this diagnostic function. Jesus’ Affirmation Matthew 5:17-18 – Christ fulfills, not abolishes, the Law. Fulfillment presupposes intrinsic goodness. His summary commands (Matthew 22:37-40) rest on Torah foundations (Deuteronomy 6:5; Leviticus 19:18). Psychological and Behavioral Insight Empirical studies on moral development show that articulated rules intensify recognition of transgression. The phenomenon Paul labels ἐπιθυμία (“coveting”) corresponds with heightened desire when an object is forbidden—observed today in “reactance theory.” The Law’s prohibition discloses and intensifies latent desire, exposing the heart’s need for transformation rather than mere regulation. Historical Reliability The Chester Beatty P46 papyrus (c. AD 200) and the Bodmer papyri preserve Romans substantially intact, confirming that Paul’s argument has been transmitted accurately. The Dead Sea Scrolls verify the wording of Exodus 20:17 (“You shall not covet”), the very citation Paul employs, demonstrating textual stability from Sinai to Second-Temple Judaism to the apostolic era. Archaeological Corroboration of Torah Authority The Ketef Hinnom silver scrolls (7th century BC) contain the priestly blessing (Numbers 6:24-26), showing Torah commands in circulation long before Paul. Such finds reinforce the continuity and authority of the Mosaic corpus he references. Practical Implications 1. For the unbeliever: The Law exposes sin, pointing to the need for the resurrected Christ, the sole source of deliverance (Romans 7:24-25). 2. For the believer: Freed from Law’s condemnation (Romans 8:1-4), yet recognizing its holiness, we fulfill its righteous requirement by walking in the Spirit, not by antinomian license. 3. Evangelistic leverage: Presenting the Ten Commandments clarifies guilt; proclaiming Christ offers remedy—an approach that mirrors Paul’s sequence. Conclusion Romans 7:7 does not suggest the Law is sinful. Paul emphatically denies such a notion. The Law is holy, righteous, and good; sin is the culprit. The Law functions as an immaculate diagnostic tool, exposing humanity’s corruption and driving us to the grace of God in Christ, whose resurrection secures the salvation the Law could never provide yet consistently anticipated. |
    |