Isaiah 48:12's link to monotheism?
How does Isaiah 48:12 relate to the concept of monotheism?

Text

“Listen to Me, O Jacob, and Israel, whom I have called: I am He; I am the First, and I am the Last.” — Isaiah 48:12


Immediate Literary Context

Chapters 40–48 form a single argumentative unit in which Yahweh repeatedly contrasts Himself with idols (e.g., 44:6–20; 46:1–9). Verse 12 sits in a courtroom-style discourse (48:1-22) where God summons Israel to recognize that He alone foretold, orchestrated, and now will accomplish their deliverance from Babylon. By asserting “I am He,” He stakes an exclusive identity claim before announcing Cyrus as His instrument (48:14-15). The structure presses monotheism: only one Being both predicts and performs history.


Historical Setting

Composed c. 700 BC (traditional unity view) and finalized before the exile, the prophecy names Babylon’s downfall and Cyrus’s rise (44:28; 45:1) 150 years ahead. The Cyrus Cylinder (c. 539 BC, British Museum) confirms Cyrus’s policy of repatriating captives—precisely what Isaiah attributes to Yahweh. Fulfilled predictive accuracy underwrites the uniqueness of the Speaker as the sole God of history.


The Title “First and Last” in Comparative Texts

Isaiah 41:4; 44:6; 48:12 use the formula; Revelation 1:17; 22:13 assigns it to Jesus. The New Testament’s seamless transfer of the phrase from Yahweh to Christ demonstrates that biblical monotheism is Trinitarian, not unitarian—one divine Being, distinct Persons.


Canonical Cross-References to Monotheism

Deuteronomy 6:4; 32:39; 1 Kings 8:60; Isaiah 45:5-6; 1 Corinthians 8:4-6. Each declares exclusive deity, and Isaiah 48:12 supplies the divine self-attestation that grounds them.


Archaeological Corroboration

• Babylonian Chronicle BM BC 21946 records Babylon’s fall to Cyrus (539 BC), matching Isaiah’s forecast.

• Nabonidus Cylinder depicts the impotence of Babylonian gods Bel and Nebo; Isaiah 46 critiques those very idols. Consilience of data reinforces Yahweh’s uniqueness.


Philosophical/Theological Significance

By grounding His claim in both eternality (“first…last”) and self-existence (“I am He”), God answers the fundamental metaphysical question: Why is there something rather than nothing? Contingent beings (idols or nature) cannot be first. Monotheism emerges not as preference but as logical necessity once an eternal, self-existent Creator is posited.


Contrast with Ancient Near Eastern Polytheism

Surrounding nations viewed deities as territorial specialists born within the cosmos. Isaiah’s Speaker transcends space and time, precedentless in ANE texts. The absolute claims of 48:12 dismantle the prevailing religious pluralism of the day.


New Testament Echo and Christological Fulfillment

Revelation 1:17—“I am the First and the Last; I am the Living One; I was dead, and behold, I am alive forever and ever”—applies Isaiah’s phrasing to the risen Christ. The resurrection, attested by early creedal material (1 Corinthians 15:3-7) and multiple lines of historical evidence, confirms that the divine title embodied in Isaiah 48:12 belongs equally to Jesus, preserving monotheism while revealing plurality within the Godhead.


Practical Implications

If God alone is “First and Last,” ultimate allegiance, moral authority, and worship belong exclusively to Him. Idolatry—ancient or modern (money, self, state)—is irrational. Salvation rests not in finite constructs but in the self-existent Lord who entered history in Christ.


Summary

Isaiah 48:12 expresses monotheism by (1) affirming God’s solitary self-existence (“I am He”), (2) declaring His exhaustive eternality (“First…Last”), (3) demonstrating His unique sovereignty through fulfilled prophecy, and (4) integrating seamlessly with both the wider Old Testament and the Christological claims of the New. The verse thus stands as a cornerstone text for the oneness and uniqueness of the triune God.

What historical context surrounds Isaiah 48:12?
Top of Page
Top of Page