What does John 9:24 reveal about the nature of belief and unbelief? Text and Immediate Context John 9:24 : “So a second time they summoned the man who had been blind and said, ‘Give glory to God! We know that this Man is a sinner.’” The verse sits at the turning point of the Jerusalem interrogation of the man born blind. His physical eyes have been opened by Christ (vv. 6–7), yet the religious authorities, unwilling to credit Jesus, launch a second inquiry. Their imperative “Give glory to God” echoes a formal oath formula (cf. Joshua 7:19) used in Jewish jurisprudence to compel a witness to tell “the truth”—yet they pre-load that “truth” with their verdict: “We know that this Man is a sinner.” Historical-Legal Background Second-Temple courts normally sought corroborative testimony (Deuteronomy 19:15). By summoning the healed man again, the Sanhedrin-linked Pharisees are attempting to invalidate Jesus’ miracle by forcing the witness to confess a theological crime (cf. John 5:16–18). The forensic setting exposes a clash between two authorities: the healed man’s empirical experience and the leaders’ entrenched presuppositions. Archaeological confirmation of the Pool of Siloam (2004 excavations, City of David) anchors John 9 in verifiable geography, reinforcing the Gospel’s historicity and courtroom realism. Miracle as Evidence and the Crisis of Interpretation A creative act comparable only to Genesis (cf. v. 32 “never has it been heard”) has occurred. Under ordinary inductive reasoning, the sign verifies the divine commissioning of the healer (John 3:2). The tribunal’s refusal shows that unbelief is not a deficit of data but a resistance to the ethical demand that evidence imposes (John 3:19–20). Presuppositional Blindness The phrase “We know” (oidamen) signals an a priori verdict. In behavioral terms, confirmation bias and motivated reasoning dominate: data contradictory to the group’s ideological framework is reframed or suppressed. Scripture diagnoses this as the noetic effect of sin (Romans 1:18–21). Belief and unbelief therefore hold moral freight, not merely intellectual content. “Give Glory to God”: Sincere Praise or Coercive Weapon? The admonition, once rightly used to elicit confession of sin before YHWH (Joshua 7:19), is perverted here to compel denial of God’s work. Thus John 9:24 highlights that religious language can mask unbelief when it insulates tradition from divine disruption. The Sinlessness of Christ Contrasted Labeling Jesus “sinner” contradicts the healed man’s empirical evidence and the Johannine witness (John 8:46; 1 Peter 2:22). The leaders’ claim therefore exposes unbelief as an ethical inversion: good is called evil (Isaiah 5:20). Later, the man counters, “We know that God does not listen to sinners” (v. 31), reversing their dogma and linking moral purity to miraculous validation. Fear, Social Cost, and Unbelief The threat of synagogue expulsion (v. 22) demonstrates that unbelief thrives under social coercion. Modern studies in social psychology (e.g., Solomon Asch conformity experiments) echo this dynamic: group pressure can override firsthand experience. John thus portrays genuine faith as courage to stand against communal intimidation. Progression from Physical to Spiritual Sight The narrative arc traces the man’s growth: 1. “The Man called Jesus” (v. 11). 2. “He is a Prophet” (v. 17). 3. “If this Man were not from God…” (v. 33). 4. “Lord, I believe” (v. 38). John 9:24 occupies the pivot; opposition crystallizes his confession. Unbelief, conversely, regresses: evidence is rejected, hearts are hardened, and self-blindness deepens (v. 41). Broader Scriptural Correlates • John 5:44—peer approval blocks faith. • John 12:37–43—miraculous signs ignored for fear of excommunication. • Luke 16:31—“If they do not listen to Moses and the Prophets, neither will they be persuaded if someone rises from the dead.” Unbelief is volitional. Evangelistic Implication Modern evangelism mirrors this encounter: present the evidence of Christ’s transformative power, yet expect that some will pre-decide the question. The task is to invite seekers to “give glory to God” by acknowledging the Son rather than dismissing Him. As Ray Comfort often frames it, the law (here the moral exposure of pride) prepares the heart; the gospel then heals spiritual blindness. Conclusion John 9:24 reveals that unbelief is chiefly a moral refusal to submit to God-attested truth, while belief is the humble alignment of mind and will to the evidence of Christ’s person and work. The verse captures the perennial choice: cling to presuppositions or confess the Glory-Bearer who opens the eyes of the blind. |
    |