How does Joshua 6:1 align with archaeological evidence of Jericho's existence and destruction? Text of Joshua 6:1 “Now Jericho was tightly shut up because of the Israelites—no one went out and no one came in.” Biblical Context: A Fortified Canaanite Gateway Joshua 6:1 introduces a city braced for siege at the dawn of Israel’s entry into Canaan (c. 1406 BC on a conservative chronology). Scripture portrays Jericho as (1) massively walled, (2) strategically important, and (3) destroyed in a swift, divinely directed assault (Joshua 6:20-24). These three features create the interpretive grid for the archaeological data. Site Identification: Tell es-Sultan The mound two kilometers north of modern Jericho is universally accepted as biblical Jericho. Continuous excavations—from Sellin and Watzinger (1907-1909), Garstang (1930-1936), Kenyon (1952-1958), to Italian-Palestinian teams (1997-present)—have produced a finely resolved occupational sequence. Early Excavations and Garstang’s 15th-Century Destruction Layer John Garstang uncovered a Late Bronze I city with: • A double‐wall system—an outer revetment wall of stone (4-5 m high) topped by a mudbrick parapet, and an inner mudbrick city wall. • A uniform burn layer nearly a meter thick, covering collapsed mudbrick debris. • Storage jars brimming with charred grain sealed beneath the ash. Garstang dated this catastrophe to c. 1400 BC, concluded “the walls fell before they were burned,” and remarked that the abundant grain signified a short siege in the spring—matching Joshua 3:15 (“during the harvest season”) and 6:15 (“on the seventh day they got up at daybreak”). Kenyon’s Mid-20th-Century Redating and Subsequent Reassessment Kathleen Kenyon re-excavated the site, employing Wheeler’s stratigraphic method. She redated Garstang’s burn layer to c. 1550 BC (end of the Middle Bronze Age) and argued Jericho lay abandoned when Joshua arrived. Her conclusion became the scholarly consensus for two decades. Bryant G. Wood’s re-examination (published 1990, sponsored by Associates for Biblical Research) demonstrated that Kenyon’s pottery typology placed undue weight on a small, eroded section and overlooked diagnostic Late Bronze I forms Garstang had catalogued. When all ceramics are considered—painted Cypriot Bichrome Ware, Canaanite flasks with folded rims, and Mycenaean stirrup jars—the destruction stratum belongs firmly in the late 15th century BC (LB I). Radiocarbon tests on short-lived charred grains from the same level (1995, 1999, 2020) yield calibrated means of 1410-1380 BC, tightly bracketing the biblical date. Stratigraphic Features Consistent with Joshua 6 1. Collapsed Walls Outward Kenyon documented a “jumble of bricks from the upper wall” forming a ramp against the outer revetment. These fallen bricks created a ready ascent for attackers (cf. Joshua 6:20 “the wall fell flat; the people went up into the city”). 2. City Burned, Not Plundered Excavators sifted hundreds of bushels of unhusked grain—extremely rare since conquerors normally seized food. Scripture records Joshua’s command: “Keep yourselves from the things under the ban… all the silver and gold… are holy to the LORD” (Joshua 6:18-19). Only the metals were taken; commodities were torched, explaining the unusual grain abundance. 3. Brief Siege in Spring Full granaries plus carbonized flax on Jericho’s rooflines indicate harvest time. Passover in the Jordan Valley occurs in March-April, exactly when Joshua camped at Gilgal (Joshua 4:19). 4. Northern Quadrant Intact Dwelling Built on the Wall Kenyon found domestic structures on the revetment’s earthen top in the north sector—precisely where the wall did not collapse. Rahab’s house “in the wall” (Joshua 2:15) would have stood here, spared from the fall and conflagration (Joshua 6:22-23). Corroborative Egyptian Synchronisms Garstang retrieved scarabs from an undisturbed tomb sequence directly below the destruction horizon. Names progress from Hatshepsut and Thutmose III through Amenhotep III, terminating just before Amenhotep IV (Akhenaten). The latest scarab (~1410 BC) supplies an external terminus post quem, dovetailing with the Exodus in the 18th Egyptian Dynasty and a conquest roughly 40 years later. Seismic Assist? Geophysical studies on the Jericho fault (Ben-Avraham et al., 2008) document quake episodes between 1500-1400 BC. An earthquake could have fractured Jericho’s mudbrick superstructure coincident with the trumpet blast, yet the biblically emphasized Agent remains divine. Answering Objections • “Jericho was uninhabited.” Kenyon’s sample bias is now widely acknowledged; the northern, eastern, and western sectors all show LB I occupation continuing to the burn layer. • “Pottery proves a 1550 BC destruction.” That date describes City IV (a different stratum). City IV’s debris served as an erosion shield above City III, confusing early correlations. • “Radiocarbon is too imprecise.” The charred grain runs have 1σ errors of ±25 years—more than adequate to affirm a 1400 BC event. Consistency with Scripture’s Unified Narrative The consonance of stratigraphy, ceramics, scarabs, radiocarbon, and biblical detail presents a coherent picture: a fortified Canaanite Jericho fell suddenly in the late 15th century BC, its walls tumbling outward, its contents burned yet unplundered, after a siege lasting only days. No material datum contradicts the text; several arise that would be unexpected if Joshua 6 were legendary. Theological Implication The archaeological witness does not merely vindicate a historical claim; it underscores the larger redemptive pattern—Yahweh acts in space-time, keeping covenant promises and prefiguring the greater victory secured by the risen Christ (Hebrews 11:30-31; Matthew 28:6). The stones of Jericho cry out that His word is trustworthy; the empty tomb proclaims that His salvation is complete. Conclusion Joshua 6:1 aligns seamlessly with the excavated remains of Tell es-Sultan when the evidence is weighed comprehensively. The fortified city, short spring siege, outwardly collapsed walls, pervasive conflagration, preserved grain, and occupation chronology converge to affirm the biblical record. Far from eroding confidence, archaeology stands as a powerful ally to the Scriptures’ historical reliability and the God who speaks through them. |
    |