How does Leviticus 18:22 align with the overall message of love in the Bible? Leviticus 18:22—Text “You must not lie with a man as with a woman; that is an abomination.” Canonical Setting: The Holiness Code Anchored in Love Leviticus 17–26 is often called the Holiness Code because every statute is framed by the repeated refrain “Be holy, for I am holy” (Leviticus 19:2). Holiness is not the opposite of love; it is its foundation. God calls Israel to mirror His character by loving neighbor (Leviticus 19:18) and by refusing practices that distort His created order—including prohibited sexual acts in Leviticus 18. The same chapter that forbids incest, adultery, and bestiality also forbids a man “lying with a man as with a woman.” Each command protects covenantal fidelity, family stability, and neighbor welfare, which are concrete expressions of love. Love as the Fulfillment of the Law Jesus summarized the entire Torah with two commands: “‘Love the Lord your God…’ and ‘Love your neighbor as yourself’” (Matthew 22:37-40). Paul adds, “Love does no wrong to its neighbor; therefore love is the fulfillment of the law” (Romans 13:10). Because homosexual acts violate the creation design for sexual union (Genesis 1:27-28; 2:24), they bring harm—to the individuals involved, to family lines, and to society—and therefore contradict biblical love. Genuine love never blesses what God calls destructive; it seeks the other’s highest good, defined by God’s revelation. Creation Order and Sexual Complementarity Genesis establishes humanity as male and female (Genesis 1:27). Marriage is defined when the man “cleaves to his wife, and they become one flesh” (Genesis 2:24), a phrase Jesus re-affirms verbatim (Mark 10:6-8). The male-female union is inherently procreative and covenantal, reflecting Christ’s love for His Church (Ephesians 5:31-32). Leviticus 18:22 protects that design. By identifying same-sex intercourse as “abomination” (Hebrew tô‘ēbâ, also used of idolatry), the text signals that the act reverses the created pattern and profanes love’s earthly symbol. Continuity in the New Testament Witness Far from being superseded, the moral principle reappears verbatim in the New Testament: • Romans 1:26-27 describes same-sex acts as “contrary to nature.” • 1 Corinthians 6:9-11 lists “arsenokoitai” (a term built from Leviticus 18:22 LXX wording) among sins that exclude from God’s kingdom—yet also proclaims radical hope: “Such were some of you, but you were washed.” • 1 Timothy 1:10 repeats the prohibition within the “sound doctrine that conforms to the gospel.” These passages ground the ethic in creation and redemption, showing Leviticus 18:22 remains morally instructive for Christians. Ceremonial vs. Moral Statutes Critics point to food restrictions or mixed-fabric bans that Christians no longer observe. The New Testament identifies those as ceremonial shadows fulfilled in Christ (Colossians 2:16-17; Acts 10:15). Sexual ethics, however, are consistently treated as moral absolutes that transcend covenantal epochs (Acts 15:20, 29). The same hermeneutic Jesus uses for murder and adultery (Matthew 5:21-30) He and His apostles apply to sexual immorality, rooting it in creation rather than ritual cleanliness. Historical Understanding in Jewish and Christian Tradition Second-Temple Jewish works (e.g., Josephus, Philo) condemn same-sex acts on the basis of Leviticus. Early church fathers—Didache 2.2; Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 3.3; Augustine, City of God 16.30—do likewise. No dissenting interpretation appears until modern times. The uniform testimony of twenty centuries evidences that Leviticus 18:22 was always read as an enduring expression of God’s moral will. Love, Truth, and Human Flourishing—Behavioral Perspective As a behavioral scientist I note that empirical studies consistently link long-term well-being to stable male-female marriage (e.g., Waite & Gallagher, The Case for Marriage, 2000). Elevated health risks among men who have sex with men (CDC, 2021 HIV Surveillance Report) corroborate Scripture’s warning that deviation from design brings harm. Telling hard truth compassionately is therefore an act of love, not condemnation. Common Objections Addressed 1. “Jesus never mentioned homosexuality.” He reaffirmed creation’s male-female paradigm (Mark 10:6-8) and condemned “porneia” (sexual immorality) broadly (Matthew 15:19), a term encompassing Leviticus 18 violations. 2. “Love means acceptance.” Biblical love “rejoices with the truth” (1 Corinthians 13:6) and calls sinners to repentance (Revelation 3:19). 3. “Orientation is immutable.” Scripture speaks to behavior, not involuntary desire; the gospel promises transformation (“such were some of you,” 1 Corinthians 6:11). Numerous testimonies (e.g., Becket Cook, Jackie Hill Perry) illustrate experiential change. Christ’s Fulfillment and the Offer of Grace The same Bible that condemns sin magnifies mercy. Christ “bore our sins in His body on the tree” (1 Peter 2:24). Forgiveness and new identity are offered to every repentant person, regardless of past behavior. Love’s apex is the cross: “while we were still sinners, Christ died for us” (Romans 5:8). Welcoming individuals without affirming destructive behavior mirrors God’s own heart. Pastoral Application—Speaking Truth in Love The Church must combine conviction with compassion, resisting both harshness and compromise. Practical steps: • Build friendships; listen to stories. • Lovingly present God’s design and the gospel’s hope. • Provide community for those pursuing celibacy or transformation. • Uphold marriage as a living apologetic. Conclusion: Harmony of Holiness and Love Leviticus 18:22 aligns with the Bible’s message of love because love is anchored in God’s holy character and His good design for humanity. Upholding that design, even when counter-cultural, seeks the true well-being of neighbor and the glory of God—the ultimate aims of biblical love. |
    |