Leviticus 20:26 and Christian holiness?
How does Leviticus 20:26 relate to the concept of holiness in Christianity?

Text and Immediate Context

“‘You are to be holy to Me because I, the LORD, am holy, and I have set you apart from the peoples to be Mine.’ ” (Leviticus 20:26)

Leviticus 20 closes a section delineating punishments for occultism, sexual perversion, and child sacrifice (vv. 1-25). Verse 26 functions as the covenantal motive clause: Israel must be qualitatively different because Yahweh Himself is qualitatively different. The root קדשׁ (qādash, “be holy, set apart”) occurs three times, stressing identity, not mere behavior.


Historical and Canonical Context

1. Covenant Framework: Leviticus mirrors the structure of late-Bronze-Age suzerainty treaties, confirmed by Hittite copies from Boghazköy (cf. Kitchen, Treaty & Covenant, p. 90). This anchoring in a real legal milieu supports its Mosaic provenance.

2. Wilderness Setting: Excavations at Timna (e.g., Rothenberg’s copper-smelting camps, 1970s) document Semitic nomads in the Sinai basin during the Late Bronze period, consistent with the Pentateuchal itinerary.

3. Canonical Placement: Leviticus stands at the Torah’s center; holiness thus becomes the Torah’s linchpin, echoed by the prophets (e.g., Isaiah 6:3) and wisdom literature (Psalm 99:3).


Theological Themes of Holiness

1. Ontological Holiness: God’s holiness is intrinsic (“I … am holy”).

2. Covenantal Holiness: Israel’s holiness is derivative—produced by divine election (“I have set you apart”).

3. Missional Holiness: The phrase “to be Mine” signals vocation, not isolation; Israel reflects God’s character to the nations (Exodus 19:5-6).


Holiness in Leviticus and Its Development

Leviticus employs concentric spheres of sanctity—Holy of Holies, sanctuary, camp—visually preaching separation. Chapters 18-20 move the concept outward: holiness must impregnate daily ethics. The “Holiness Code” (Leviticus 17-26) climaxes with 20:26, explicitly rooting ethics in imitatio Dei (“because … I am holy”).


Holiness and Separation

“Set you apart” (בדל, bādal) echoes Genesis 1’s creation verbs (“God separated light from darkness,” Genesis 1:4). Thus holiness restores creational order disrupted by sin. Christian theology later identifies the church as a “new creation” (2 Corinthians 5:17).


Typological Fulfillment in Christ

1. Christ the Holy One: In Mark 1:24 demons confess Jesus as “the Holy One of God,” declaring the perfect embodiment of Leviticus 20:26.

2. Substitutionary Consecration: Hebrews 10:10—“By that will, we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all.” Christ’s atoning death achieves the separation prefigured in Israel’s system.

3. Resurrection Vindication: The empty tomb (accepted by nearly all critical scholars per Habermas–Licona, The Case for the Resurrection, pp. 57-62) proves divine approval of the Holy One (Acts 2:27).


New Testament Echoes and Applications

1 Peter 1:15-16 explicitly cites Leviticus: “Be holy, for I am holy.” Peter applies the Old-Covenant calling to a mixed-ethnicity church (cf. 1 Peter 2:9). Paul likewise calls believers “saints” (ἅγιοι, hagioi) in every greeting, grounding ethical exhortations (e.g., Ephesians 4-5) in identity.


Holiness in the Believer’s Life

a. Positional: The believer is already “sanctified in Christ Jesus” (1 Corinthians 1:2).

b. Progressive: “Perfecting holiness in the fear of God” (2 Corinthians 7:1).

c. Ultimate: Final glorification—“without blemish” (Ephesians 5:27).


Ecclesiological Implications

The local church is “a holy temple” (Ephesians 2:21). Church discipline (1 Corinthians 5) mirrors Leviticus’s call to purge evil “from among you,” protecting the corporate witness.


Missional and Ethical Outworking

Holiness attracts: archaeological finds at Tel Dan reveal pagan cultic sites laden with immorality contemporary to Israel; in contrast, Israel’s holiness code upheld life, family, and justice. Modern missiology observes similar apologetic power when Christian communities exhibit marriage fidelity and compassion (e.g., 2nd-century Letter to Diognetus).


Continuity and Discontinuity

Moral principles persist; cultic shadows pass. The Westminster Confession (19.3-5) articulates this Reformed consensus, yet all mainstream Christian traditions affirm Leviticus 20:26’s enduring moral thrust.


Conclusion

Leviticus 20:26 is a hinge verse connecting covenant identity, ethical living, and redemptive anticipation. In Christianity, it finds full expression in Christ’s redemptive work, forms the paradigm for personal and corporate sanctification, and fuels the church’s mission to display God’s holiness to the world.

What does Leviticus 20:26 mean by being 'set apart' for God?
Top of Page
Top of Page