How does Judges 11:13 connect to God's promises to Israel in Genesis? Setting the Scene - Jephthah’s messengers have asked the king of Ammon why he is attacking Israel. - The Ammonite king replies: “When Israel came out of Egypt, they took away my land from the Arnon to the Jabbok and the Jordan. Now therefore return it peaceably.” (Judges 11:13) Judges 11:13—The Ammonite Claim - The king frames the conflict as a land dispute. - He insists that Israel seized Ammonite territory during the conquest under Moses and Joshua. - His request: give it back, and war can be avoided. Tracing the Land Promise Back to Genesis 1. Initial Grant to Abraham - “To your offspring I will give this land.” (Genesis 12:7) - The “land” is further described as stretching from Egypt to the Euphrates (Genesis 15:18-21). 2. Reaffirmation to Isaac - “Stay in this land... for to you and your descendants I will give all these lands.” (Genesis 26:3) 3. Confirmation to Jacob - “The land I gave to Abraham and Isaac I give to you.” (Genesis 35:12) 4. Inheritance Identified by Boundaries - Genesis 15 lists peoples to be displaced: Kenites, Kenizzites, Hittites, Perizzites, Rephaites, Amorites, Canaanites, Girgashites, Jebusites—not Ammonites. - Deuteronomy 2:9 specifically tells Israel not to harass or take the land of the Ammonites because the LORD had given it to Lot’s descendants. Overlapping Boundaries: What God Promised - The land east of the Jordan north of the Arnon (later held by Reuben, Gad, half-Manasseh) was formerly Amorite, not Ammonite (Numbers 21:24-26). - Israel defeated King Sihon of the Amorites, then settled that territory at God’s direction (Deuteronomy 2:31-33). - So, the area in question fits the Genesis promise as expanded through Moses: land taken from the Amorites falls under the Abrahamic boundary from the “River of Egypt to the Euphrates” (Genesis 15:18). Why the Ammonite Argument Falls Short - The claim ignores God’s command in Deuteronomy 2:19 prohibiting Israel from seizing Ammon’s own allotment. - Historical record: Ammon had already lost the Arnon-Jabbok strip to the Amorites before Israel arrived (Joshua 13:25). - God’s covenant makes Israel’s possession a matter of divine grant, not opportunistic conquest (Genesis 17:8). Takeaways for Today - God’s promises in Genesis shape the legitimacy of Israel’s later actions; Scripture’s storyline is internally consistent. - Human claims that contradict God’s covenant cannot cancel His word. - The episode underscores God’s faithfulness: what He vowed to Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, He delivered—even amid contested borders and rival narratives. |
    |