How does Luke 1:28 support the doctrine of the Virgin Mary? Context in Luke’s Narrative 1. Divine Initiative (vv. 26–27). Gabriel is sent, not summoned, stressing supernatural origin. 2. Qualified Virgin (v. 27). Mary is “a virgin pledged to a man named Joseph,” establishing virginal status before any mention of future conception. 3. Angelic Pronouncement (v. 28) precedes the disclosure of the miracle (vv. 31–35), showing that the grace given is the cause, not the effect, of the virgin conception. 4. Clarification (vv. 34–35). Mary’s question—“How will this be, since I am a virgin?”—and Gabriel’s answer—“The Holy Spirit will come upon you….” confirm that Gabriel’s greeting introduces a miraculous, non-sexual conception. Intertextual Links to Old Testament Prophecy Isaiah 7:14 LXX: “ἰδοὺ ἡ παρθένος ἐν γαστρὶ λήμψεται” (“Behold, the virgin shall conceive”). Matthew 1:23 explicitly ties this prophecy to Jesus’ birth and quotes it verbatim. Luke’s use of παρθένος (1:27, 34) deliberately parallels Isaiah’s terminology, anchoring the virgin conception in pre-Christian Scripture. Theological Implications: Divine Authorship of Salvation 1. Monergism of Grace. Kecharitōménē denotes God’s unilateral act. Salvation is likewise monergistic; the incarnation inaugurates redemption (John 1:14; Galatians 4:4). 2. Sinless Savior Necessity. Virgin birth circumvents Adamic paternity; Romans 5:12–19 links original sin to Adam’s line. 3. Incarnation without Confusion. Luke affirms full humanity (conceived in womb) and full divinity (by the Holy Spirit) without mythological embellishment. Patristic Reception • Ignatius, Letter to the Ephesians 18.2 (c. AD 110): “Our God, Jesus Christ, was conceived by Mary according to God’s plan…” • Justin Martyr, Dialogue 66 (c. AD 150): cites Isaiah 7:14, insists on literal virginity. • Irenaeus, Adv. Haer. 3.19.3 (c. AD 180): Mary’s obedience contrasted with Eve’s disobedience, dependent on Luke 1 narrative. Addressing Objections 1. “Young Woman, Not Virgin.” Luke employs παρθένος twice and records Mary’s astonishment at conception “since I have not known a man.” The term cannot mean merely “young woman” without gutting the narrative logic. 2. “Myth Parallels.” Unlike pagan myths (e.g., Zeus’s physical unions), Luke presents a non-sexual, historical event dated “in the days of Herod” (1:5) and anchored by eyewitness sources (1:1–4). 3. “Late Legend.” 𝔓⁷⁵ predates the Council of Nicaea by over a century, refuting claims of later doctrinal fabrication. Practical and Devotional Significance Mary’s example demonstrates receptive faith: “Behold, the bondservant of the Lord; may it happen to me according to your word.” (Luke 1:38). Believers likewise receive, not initiate, grace. Her virginity underscores God’s power to bring life where human ability ends, encouraging trust in divine promises of new birth (John 3:3–8). Conclusion Luke 1:28, through its stable text, perfect-passive participle kecharitōménē, and placement within the annunciation narrative, provides foundational support for the doctrine that Jesus was conceived in the womb of a virgin uniquely graced by God. This verse, linked with Isaiah 7:14 and corroborated by early creeds and manuscripts, anchors the historic Christian confession that the incarnation—and thus salvation—rests entirely on divine initiative accomplished through a genuine virgin conception. |
    |