How does Luke 1:6 challenge the concept of sinlessness? Text and Primary Citation Luke 1:6 : “Both of them were righteous in the sight of God, walking blamelessly in all the commandments and decrees of the Lord.” Historical-Cultural Context Zechariah and Elizabeth lived under the Mosaic covenant. Daily sacrifices (Exodus 29:38-42) and annual atonement rites (Leviticus 16) presupposed sin. To be “blameless” was to keep the covenant’s stipulations, including repentance and sacrifice, not to exist without any sin. Comparative Biblical Parallels • Noah – “blameless” (Genesis 6:9), yet sinned (Genesis 9:21). • Job – “blameless and upright” (Job 1:1), yet repents in dust and ashes (Job 42:6). • Paul – “as to the law, blameless” (Philippians 3:6), yet calls himself the chief of sinners (1 Timothy 1:15). The pattern shows blamelessness ≠ sinlessness. Luke’s Immediate Narrative Evidence Just twelve verses later Zechariah doubts Gabriel (1:18), is disciplined with muteness (1:20), and later praises God for redemption (1:68). Luke himself demonstrates that this “righteous” man still faltered and needed mercy. Universal Sinfulness Affirmed Elsewhere • 1 Kings 8:46 – “There is no one who does not sin.” • Psalm 14:3 / Romans 3:10-23 – “None is righteous, not even one.” • 1 John 1:8 – “If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves.” Scripture’s self-consistency precludes the existence of any sinless humans apart from Christ. Christ Alone Sinless • 2 Corinthians 5:21 – “He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us.” • Hebrews 4:15 – “tempted in every way yet without sin.” The exclusive claim of Christ’s sinlessness remains intact; Luke 1:6 does not create a second category of impeccable humans. Blamelessness in Covenant Perspective Blamelessness conveys: 1. Genuine faith (Genesis 15:6; Luke 1:45). 2. Regular repentance and sacrifice (Leviticus 17:11). 3. Observable obedience (Deuteronomy 6:17). Thus God’s verdict “righteous” is forensic (declared) and relational (lived), not an announcement of intrinsic moral perfection. Patristic and Reformation Witness • Augustine, Sermon 175: “They were righteous, not because they never sinned, but because by humility they confessed their sins.” • Calvin, Commentary on Luke: “Such righteousness is not the perfection of life, but integrity accompanied by the forgiveness of sins.” Objections Answered Objection: “If ordinary humans can be blameless, Christ’s uniqueness is diluted.” Response: Christ’s uniqueness lies in absolute impeccability (ontological and moral), whereas Zechariah and Elizabeth’s blamelessness is covenantal, maintained through faith and sacrifice, and still anticipates the final atonement Christ would provide. Objection: “Amemptos plainly means ‘without fault.’” Response: Context governs sense. Paul calls himself amemptos pre-conversion in Philippians 3:6 yet also confesses continuing sin in Romans 7. The term therefore indicates external chargeability, not inward perfection. Practical and Pastoral Applications • Encouragement – God counts sincere, obedient believers as “blameless” despite ongoing moral struggle. • Humility – The righteous still need discipline and redemption (Zechariah’s muteness). • Hope – Blameless living is possible by grace-enabled obedience, pointing to the ultimately sinless Savior. Conclusion Luke 1:6 celebrates covenant fidelity, not human sinlessness. It illustrates that ordinary believers, through faith, repentance, and obedience, can be declared “righteous” and live “blamelessly,” while the canon as a whole reserves absolute sinlessness for Jesus Christ alone. The verse therefore harmonizes with, rather than challenges, the biblical doctrine that “all have sinned” and that salvation rests exclusively in the perfect life, atoning death, and bodily resurrection of the risen Lord. |
    |