Luke 20:33 on afterlife marriage?
How does Luke 20:33 address the concept of marriage in the afterlife?

Reference Text

“‘In the resurrection, whose wife will she be? For all seven were married to her.’ ” (Luke 20:33)


Immediate Setting: The Sadducean Challenge

Luke 20:27–40 records a public exchange in Jerusalem during Jesus’ final week. The Sadducees—who denied bodily resurrection (Acts 23:8)—present a reductio ad absurdum using the Levirate-marriage statute of Deuteronomy 25:5-10. By positing seven sequential husbands, they intend to expose an alleged logical inconsistency in the doctrine of resurrection.


Parallel Synoptic Passages

Matthew 22:23-33 and Mark 12:18-27 relay the same incident, reinforcing inter-Gospel agreement. All three accounts converge on two points: (1) marriage is an institution of “this age,” not “that age,” and (2) resurrection life is secured by the power of God, who “is not the God of the dead but of the living” (Luke 20:38).


Key Terms and Greek Exegesis

• “Resurrection” (ἀνάστασις, anastasis) denotes physical rising, not mere spiritual survival.

• “Marry” (γαμίζω, gamizō) and “be given in marriage” delineate male-initiated and family-initiated nuptials, respectively, situating the discussion within ordinary, temporal social structures.

• “Sons of this age” (οἱ υἱοὶ τοῦ αἰῶνος τούτου) contrasts with “those who are considered worthy to attain to that age” (v. 35), underscoring two discrete economies: the present fallen cosmos and the consummated kingdom.


Old Testament Foundations

Marriage is introduced pre-Fall for procreation and partnership (Genesis 1:28; 2:18-24). Levirate marriage safeguards lineage and inheritance (Deuteronomy 25:5-10). Yet eschatological prophecy already hints at a transformed relational order (Isaiah 54:5; 62:5), where Yahweh is the covenant Husband of His people.


Canonical Unity: Marriage Recast in Christ

Ephesians 5:31-32 identifies earthly marriage as a “mystery” typifying Christ and the Church, anticipating its fulfillment in the “marriage supper of the Lamb” (Revelation 19:7-9). Earthly unions give way to a grander, corporate Nuptial reality, consistent with Jesus’ declaration that resurrected saints “neither marry nor are given in marriage” (Luke 20:35).


Historical Interpretation

• Tertullian (On Monogamy 10) cited Luke 20 to advocate continence after a spouse’s death, viewing remarriage as permissible but eschatologically temporary.

• Augustine (City of God 22.17) understood resurrected bodies as perfected, sexed humans who nonetheless “will not need marriage for the propagation of children.”

These consistent patristic readings affirm that Jesus’ statement is descriptive, not denigrating, of marriage.


Archaeological Notes Supporting Resurrection Hope

First-century ossuaries inscribed “Jesus, remember me” (cf. Luke 23:42) and “Jehovah is my help” attest to Jewish resurrection expectation. The cultic architecture of the Church of the Holy Sepulchre, traceable to Constantine (A.D. 335) and built over an earlier first-century quarry-tomb complex, demonstrates early Christian conviction in bodily resurrection—the very doctrine under debate in Luke 20.


Philosophical and Behavioral Implications

Recognizing marriage as provisional liberates believers from absolutizing temporal relationships, fostering sacrificial love oriented toward eternity (1 Corinthians 7:29-31). Psychologically, this eschatological vision promotes resilience amid grief; widows and widowers can grieve with hope, knowing marital joy, though precious, is not ultimate.


Pastoral and Evangelistic Application

1. Comfort the bereaved: earthly separation is real but not final for those in Christ.

2. Elevate singleness: vocational singleness foreshadows the undivided devotion of the coming age (Matthew 19:12; 1 Corinthians 7:32-35).

3. Proclaim the resurrection: Luke 20:33-38 anchors evangelism in the historic, empirical rising of Jesus, validated by “many convincing proofs” (Acts 1:3) and over 500 eyewitnesses (1 Corinthians 15:6).


Conclusion

Luke 20:33 serves not to trivialize marriage but to re-locate it within a grand eschatological panorama where covenant love finds its ultimate fulfillment in union with the risen Christ.

How should Luke 20:33 influence our perspective on earthly relationships and eternity?
Top of Page
Top of Page