How does Matthew 28:9 support the resurrection of Jesus? Canonical Text “Suddenly Jesus met them and said, ‘Greetings!’ They came to Him, clasped His feet, and worshiped Him.” (Matthew 28:9) Immediate Narrative Setting Matthew 28 opens with two women—Mary Magdalene and “the other Mary”—arriving at the tomb “after the Sabbath” (28:1). An angel declares Jesus already risen (28:5-6). Verse 9 records the first post-empty-tomb encounter between the risen Christ and any human beings in Matthew’s Gospel. The timing (“Suddenly”) and the personal appearance (“Jesus met them”) form a seamless continuation of the angel’s proclamation, ensuring that the resurrection is not a later theological reflection but an event embedded in the historical flow of the narrative. Eyewitness Texture and Historical Reliability 1. Multiple sensory details (“Greetings … clasped His feet”) display what classical historians label “verisimilitude”—touchstone markers that genuine eyewitnesses include unconsciously. 2. Female witnesses: In first-century Judaism women’s testimony lacked legal standing (Josephus, Antiq. 4.8.15). Inventing a foundational resurrection report with women first on the scene would have undermined credibility; therefore, its presence argues for authenticity. 3. Immediate response (“worshiped Him”) reveals a monotheistic Jewish paradigm shift only explainable by a physical, risen encounter. Physicality of the Resurrection “Clasped His feet” (Greek: ekratēsan autou tous podas) conveys tactile contact. Docetism (the claim Jesus only seemed physical) crumbles under such material language. The detail parallels Luke 24:39—“Touch Me and see”—and John 20:17, cementing a consistent multi-Gospel pattern that the resurrected body is corporeal, not ethereal. Harmonization with Other Resurrection Accounts Matthew emphasizes immediacy; John details a separate appearance to Mary Magdalene (John 20:14-18). Sequence is complementary, not contradictory: • Angelic message (Matthew 28:5-7; Mark 16:5-7) • Initial departure (Matthew 28:8; Mark 16:8) • Personal appearance (Matthew 28:9; John 20:14-17) • Subsequent group appearances (Luke 24:13-49; John 20:19-29; 1 Corinthians 15:5-7). Ancient historians often arrange material thematically. Matthew’s compressed style spotlights the risen Christ’s royal authority by moving quickly from grave to worship. Theological Significance 1. Christological affirmation: Worship is rendered to Yahweh alone (Deuteronomy 6:13). Acceptance of worship without rebuke signals divinity recognized in resurrected flesh. 2. Fulfillment of promise: Jesus predicted He would meet His disciples in Galilee after rising (Matthew 26:32). Verse 9 inaugurates that fulfillment. 3. Eschatological firstfruits: 1 Corinthians 15:20 calls Christ “firstfruits of those who have fallen asleep.” Matthew 28:9 provides the inaugural sighting, anchoring the doctrine in history. Philosophical Necessity If God exists and is morally perfect, He would vindicate the sinless Messiah. A bodily resurrection not only vindicates but publicly demonstrates victory over death (Romans 6:9), fulfilling both justice and mercy. Without a real resurrection, Christian ethics collapse under Paul’s admission, “If Christ has not been raised, your faith is futile” (1 Corinthians 15:17). Archaeological and Extra-Biblical Corroboration • The Nazareth Inscription (1st-century edict against tomb robbery) suggests an imperial reaction to early reports of a disturbed Jewish grave. • Ossuaries bearing crucifixion nails (e.g., Yehohanan, discovered 1968) confirm Roman execution practices mirrored in the Gospels. • First-century synagogue at Magdala underscores Mary Magdalene’s historical hometown, reinforcing the authenticity of a key eyewitness. Integration with Intelligent Design A Creator who fine-tunes cosmic constants (e.g., strong nuclear force, gravitational constant) to sustain life logically possesses power to intervene supernaturally within the same cosmos. The resurrection is consistent with an intelligently designed universe where natural laws are upheld by, and therefore subject to, their Lawgiver. Objections Considered Hallucination Theory: Fails to explain physical contact and group experiences (1 Corinthians 15:6). Stolen Body: Guard detail (Matthew 27:62-66) and subsequent willingness of disciples to die for truth make theft implausible. Legend Development: Required time exceeds the 15-20-year gap between event and Paul’s creedal summary (1 Corinthians 15:3-7), which predates Matthew’s composition. Conclusion Matthew 28:9 supports the resurrection by uniting narrative immediacy, physical interaction, worshipful recognition, unanimous manuscript evidence, and behavioral transformation—elements that converge only if Jesus truly rose bodily from the dead. |
    |