Matthew 5:33 on keeping oaths promises?
What does Matthew 5:33 teach about the importance of keeping oaths and promises?

Text of Matthew 5:33

“Again, you have heard that it was said to the ancients, ‘Do not break your oath, but fulfill your vows to the Lord.’”


Immediate Context in the Sermon on the Mount

Matthew 5:33 stands in the third of six “You have heard … but I say to you” contrasts (5:21–48). Jesus addresses murder, adultery, divorce, oaths, retaliation, and love for enemies. Each topic exposes how first-century religious leaders reduced Torah commands to external regulations while neglecting the heart. Here, Messiah moves the discussion from technical oath-keeping to unqualified truthfulness.


Old Testament Foundations of Oaths

1. Moral gravity: “If a man makes a vow to the LORD … he must not break his word; he must do all that he has promised” (Numbers 30:2).

2. Covenant model: Yahweh swore by Himself to Abraham (Genesis 22:16-17), confirming that an oath invoked God as witness and guarantor.

3. Judicial function: Deuteronomy 6:13 and 10:20 allowed solemn oaths “in His name” to establish veracity in a fallen world.

4. Warning: “You shall not swear falsely by My name and so profane the name of your God” (Leviticus 19:12). The sin lay not in swearing per se but in perjury and frivolous invocation of the divine Name.


Rabbinic Misinterpretation and First-Century Practice

By the first century, casuistic hair-splitting produced a hierarchy of oaths. Swearing “by heaven,” “by earth,” or “by Jerusalem” (cf. Matthew 23:16-22) was considered less binding than swearing “by the gold of the temple.” The Mishnah (Shevuot 4–5) records elaborate exceptions, fostering a culture where technical wording justified deceit. Jesus quotes the popular summary—“Do not break your oath”—then restores the original ethic.


Jesus’ Deeper Ethic: Truthfulness Without Qualification

Verses 34-37 complete the teaching:

“But I tell you not to swear at all … Let your ‘Yes’ be yes and your ‘No,’ no. Anything more comes from the evil one” .

1. Prohibition addresses evasive formulas, not lawful covenantal or courtroom oaths (cf. Matthew 26:63-64; 2 Corinthians 1:23; Hebrews 6:13-17).

2. Underlying principle: every word is spoken coram Deo—before God—so adding sacred vocabulary cannot intensify accountability.

3. Moral implication: the disciple’s ordinary speech must be so reliable that oaths become unnecessary.


God’s Character as the Ultimate Model of Faithful Promise-Keeping

Scripture grounds ethics in God’s nature: “God is not a man, that He should lie” (Numbers 23:19). His covenant faithfulness culminates in the resurrection of Christ—public proof that every divine promise “finds its Yes in Him” (2 Corinthians 1:20). Christians, recreated in Christ’s image, must mirror that unwavering fidelity.


Biblical Cross-References on Vows and Truthfulness

Psalm 15:4—The righteous “keeps his oath even when it hurts.”

Ecclesiastes 5:4-5—“Better not to vow than to vow and not fulfill.”

James 5:12—Echoing Jesus: “Above all, my brothers, do not swear … but let your ‘Yes’ be yes and your ‘No,’ no.”

Revelation 21:8—“All liars” face judgment, underscoring eternal stakes.


The Linguistic and Manuscript Evidence for Authenticity

All extant Greek witnesses—from Codex Vaticanus (B, 4th c.) to the Byzantine majority—contain the verse without variation. The verb ἐπιορκέω (“break an oath”) appears only here in the NT, anchoring the logion in first-century legal vocabulary. Patristic citations (Justin, Irenaeus, Tertullian) confirm transmission by the second century, demonstrating textual stability and reinforcing the verse’s authority.


Historical and Contemporary Illustrations

• Early Church: Pagans marveled that Christians refused to swear by the emperor’s genius yet were renowned for truthful dealings; see Pliny the Younger, Ephesians 10.96.

• Modern courts: Witnesses still place a hand on the Bible, tacitly admitting the objective moral order Jesus articulates.

• Anecdotal: Mission hospitals reporting miraculous healings often attribute credibility to staff whose word is inviolate, opening doors for gospel proclamation.


Practical Applications for Believers Today

1. Business and contracts: honor terms promptly; avoid fine-print loopholes.

2. Speech: eliminate exaggeration and hedging; do not promise what providence may forbid (“If the Lord wills,” James 4:15).

3. Digital integrity: truthful representation on social media and taxes.

4. Church life: leaders model transparency; membership vows treated as solemn commitments.


Eschatological Dimension of Promise-Keeping

The New Jerusalem is described as a city “whose builder and architect is God” (Hebrews 11:10)—an environment purged of deceit (Revelation 21:27). Faithfulness now is rehearsal for eternal citizenship, where unalloyed truth reigns.


Conclusion

Matthew 5:33 teaches that keeping oaths and promises matters because every word is spoken before the God who cannot lie. Jesus raises the bar from ritual oath formulas to a life of habitual, Spirit-empowered integrity that reflects God’s own covenant faithfulness, blesses human society, and prepares believers for the truth-saturated kingdom to come.

How can Matthew 5:33 influence our understanding of truthfulness in relationships?
Top of Page
Top of Page