What does 1 Corinthians 14:39 mean by "do not forbid speaking in tongues"? Immediate Literary Setting Paul concludes a three-chapter unit (12–14) on spiritual gifts. Chapter 12 identifies diverse gifts, chapter 13 supplies the love-grid through which every gift must operate, and chapter 14 applies that grid to prophecy and tongues inside the gathered assembly. Verse 39 is the final balancing injunction: desire the intelligible gift of prophecy, yet leave room for the authentic, Spirit-given phenomenon of tongues. Historical-Cultural Background Corinth straddled two busy seaports and was flooded with multilingual travelers. First-century believers there likely included immigrants, merchants, former slaves, and Roman officials. The city’s religious life featured ecstatic speech in the cults of Dionysus and Cybele. Paul therefore draws a sharp line: genuine glossolalia is Spirit-enabled, orderly, and intelligible when interpreted (14:5, 27–28); pagan frenzy is chaotic and self-exalting (14:23). Verse 39 guards against over-reaction: do not swing from disorder to outright ban. Biblical Purpose of Tongues 1. Missional Sign (Acts 2:4, 11) 2. Self-edification in private prayer (1 Corinthians 14:4, 18–19) 3. Corporate edification when interpreted (14:5, 27) 4. Judicial sign to unbelieving Israel, echoing Isaiah 28:11–12 (14:21–22). Apostolic Regulation, Not Prohibition Paul’s four restraints (14:27–28) assume the gift’s continuance: • Two or three speakers maximum • Sequential speech • Mandatory interpretation • Silence if no interpreter Thus verse 39 preserves liberty inside boundaries. Forbidding would undermine the Spirit’s sovereignty (12:11). Early Church Testimony • Irenaeus notes “many brethren…who through the Spirit speak all kinds of languages” (Against Heresies 5.6.1). • Origen references tongues as still observed in his day (Contra Celsum 7.8). • The fourth-century Apostolic Constitutions (8.1.2) echo Paul’s order of two or three speakers with interpretation. These sources show that post-apostolic leaders regulated but did not suppress the gift. Continuation or Cessation? • Continuationists cite the open-ended language (“until the perfect comes,” 13:10) and post-NT attestations. • Cessationists argue that tongues functioned as revelatory sign tied to the apostolic era. Verse 39 keeps local churches from adopting an absolute ban whether one’s eschatological “perfect” has arrived or not. Even cessationists normally concede that if genuine tongues were to occur, Scripture forbids blanket prohibition. Contemporary Guidelines 1. Test every spirit (1 John 4:1). 2. Ensure linguistic content; avoid meaningless repetition (Matthew 6:7). 3. Require interpretation in corporate worship. 4. Maintain pastoral oversight; gifts serve the body, not private prestige (1 Peter 4:10). 5. Pursue love above experience (1 Corinthians 13:1). Common Objections Addressed “Tongues today are psychological.” • MRI studies (Newberg 2006, University of Pennsylvania) show decreased prefrontal activity during glossolalia, opposite of self-induced fabrication, indicating a non-cognitive source consistent with Spirit empowerment. “Ancient Corinthian tongues were only foreign languages.” • Paul contrasts speech “no one understands” (14:2) with xenoglossic Acts 2, suggesting a broader phenomenon encompassing both earthly and heavenly dialects. “Prohibiting ensures order.” • Paul obtained order without prohibition by enforcing interpretation, sequence, and number limits. Canonical Harmony 1 Cor 14:39 coheres with: • Mark 16:17—“These signs will accompany those who believe…” • Acts 10:46; 19:6—Spirit-baptized Gentiles and Ephesian disciples spoke in tongues. • 1 Thessalonians 5:20—“Do not despise prophecies,” parallel logic to not forbidding tongues. Conclusion 1 Corinthians 14:39 commands churches to guard against outlawing a legitimate spiritual gift while simultaneously pursuing intelligible edification. Its ongoing force lies in honoring the Spirit’s diversity, exalting Christ above ecstatic display, and orchestrating worship that glorifies God and builds up His people. |
    |