Meaning of "many dreams, many words"?
What does Ecclesiastes 5:7 mean by "many dreams and many words are meaningless"?

Text

“For in the multitude of dreams and in many words there is futility; but fear God.” — Ecclesiastes 5:7


Immediate Literary Context

Ecclesiastes 5:1-7 addresses worshipers entering the house of God. Verses 1-6 warn against rash vows and careless speech before the Almighty. Verse 7 concludes the section: human verbosity and dream-filled self-projection are “hevel” (vain, transient), whereas reverent awe toward God is enduring.


Ancient Near Eastern Background

Mesopotamian cults multiplied incantations and recorded dream-texts for divination. Ugaritic tablets (CAT 1.23) show priests interpreting dreams to manipulate deities. Ecclesiastes counters this culture: piling up dreams and speeches does not coerce Yahweh; genuine fear (reverent obedience) is required.


Canonical Cross-References

• Dream inflation condemned: Jeremiah 23:25-32; Zechariah 10:2; Jude v. 8.

• Word inflation warned: Proverbs 10:19; 13:3; 17:27-28; Matthew 6:7.

• Fear of God commended: Psalm 34:9; Proverbs 1:7; Isaiah 8:13; Acts 10:35; Revelation 14:7.

Scripture consistently contrasts empty verbosity with humble reverence.


Theological Significance

1. Epistemic humility: human constructs (dreams, verbose logic) cannot penetrate divine mystery.

2. Moral accountability: vows and speech invoke God’s holiness (Matthew 12:36).

3. Central ethic: “fear God” ultimately leads to Christ, in whom reverence and redemption meet (1 Peter 1:17-19).


Behavioural and Philosophical Insights

Contemporary cognitive research notes “confabulation”—the brain’s tendency to weave imaginative narratives, especially in REM sleep and goal-oriented daydreaming. Excessive linguistic rationalization (“many words”) similarly reinforces self-deception. Ecclesiastes anticipates this: subjective projections lack ontological weight before the Creator.


Historical Reception

• Early Jewish exegesis (Targum Qohelet) links the verse to false prophecy.

• Athanasius cites it against Arian sophistry: rhetoric without godly fear is vapour.

• The Reformers (Luther’s 1532 lectures) read it as critique of monastic verbosity. Consensus spans centuries: substance lies not in talk but in awe of God.


Practical Applications

1. Worship: approach with measured speech (Ecclesiastes 5:2) and heart-level sincerity.

2. Prayer: avoid manipulative verbosity; align with Christ’s model (Matthew 6:9-13).

3. Decision-making: test dreams and impressions against Scripture; submit them to godly counsel (1 John 4:1).

4. Communication: value clarity over volume; truth over embellishment.


Addressing Misconceptions

• Does the verse discredit God-given prophetic dreams? No; legitimate dreams (Genesis 28; Matthew 1-2) are divinely initiated, rare, and verified. The warning targets self-generated fantasies.

• Is speech itself suspect? Not speech but unchecked excess—speech divorced from obedience (James 1:22).


Gospel Horizon

Reverent fear finds its climax in the risen Christ: “Do not be afraid. I am the First and the Last, the Living One; I was dead, and behold, now I am alive forever and ever” (Revelation 1:17-18). The empty tomb crushes empty talk; resurrection reality grounds eternal meaning.


Summary

Ecclesiastes 5:7 teaches that multiplying dreams and words—human attempts to secure control, meaning, or religious leverage—dissolve into futility. The antidote is a continual, obedient fear of God, ultimately fulfilled in the crucified and risen Lord.

In what ways can we prioritize God's reverence over worldly distractions today?
Top of Page
Top of Page