What is the significance of Meshech and Kedar in Psalm 120:5? Psalm 120:5 “Woe to me that I dwell in Meshech, that I live among the tents of Kedar!” Immediate Literary Context Psalm 120 opens the fifteen “Songs of Ascents” (Psalm 120–134). The superscript places it on the lips of a pilgrim beginning the upward journey to Jerusalem. Verses 1–4 lament deceitful hostility; verse 5 pinpoints the poet’s setting “in Meshech” and “among the tents of Kedar,” intensifying the sense of alien residence before the joyful approach to Zion (vv.6-7). Genealogical and Ethno-Geographical Background Meshech and Kedar trace back to separate patriarchal lineages: • Meshech – a son of Japheth (Genesis 10:2). Extra-biblical cuneiforms from Tiglath-Pileser I (c. 1100 BC) through Sargon II (late 8th cent. BC) mention “Musku” or “Mushki,” plausible correlatives to Meshech, inhabiting the Anatolian/Black Sea region (modern Georgia/Turkey). Ezekiel 27:13; 32:26; 38:2 identify the people with bronze trade, military prowess, and latter-day northern coalitions. • Kedar – second son of Ishmael (Genesis 25:13). Assyrian annals of Esarhaddon and Nabonidus’ Arabian inscriptions testify to a powerful nomadic confederation “Qedar” controlling the Arabian desert trade routes from the Negev to northern Arabia in the 8th–6th centuries BC (e.g., prism BM 91028). Isaiah 21:16-17; 42:11; Jeremiah 49:28-33, and Ezekiel 27:21 portray Kedar’s tent-dwelling pastoralism, archery, and commerce in lambs and rams. Thus the Psalmist juxtaposes a remote northern tribal group (Meshech) with a southern desert clan (Kedar), conveying geographic extremity that virtually brackets Israel from two ends of the compass. Symbolic and Theological Force 1. Alienation: Both peoples were historically non-covenantal, war-like, and distant. By claiming residence “in Meshech… among the tents of Kedar,” the pilgrim dramatizes estrangement from the holy land and its worship, paralleling the exilic lament of Psalm 137. 2. Moral Contrast: Meshech and Kedar are repeatedly linked with violence and deceit (Ezekiel 38:2-3; Jeremiah 49:28-31). Their mention in Psalm 120, immediately after the plea to be delivered “from lying lips” (v.2), underscores the moral environment confronting the faithful. 3. Eschatological Undercurrent: Ezekiel 38 places Meshech (rendered “Rosh, Meshech, and Tubal”) in an ultimate hostile coalition. Isaiah 60:7, conversely, envisions Kedar’s flocks glorifying the future Temple. The Psalm therefore foreshadows the tension between present hostility and future inclusion of nations under Messiah’s reign. Historical Reliability Dead Sea Scroll fragment 4QPs⁽ᵃ⁾ (c. 70–50 BC) preserves the identical Hebrew text of Psalm 120:5, corroborating the Masoretic consonants for “meshek” and “qedar.” The Septuagint reads Μοσοχ and Κηδάρ, demonstrating second-century-BC Greek translators recognized the same ethnic referents. The uniformity across manuscript families confirms the verse’s authenticity. Assyriology and archaeology bolster the biblical portrayal: the clay prism of Sennacherib (BM 91033) lists “the king of Musku,” while ostraca from Dumah in northern Arabia mention “kdry,” supporting Kedar’s nomadic hegemony. Such data harmonize with the Scriptural timeline accepted by conservative chronologies without contradiction. Typological Application Believers are “sojourners and exiles” (1 Peter 2:11). The Psalm models righteous lament amid a corrupt culture, anticipating the ultimate ascent not merely to earthly Jerusalem but to “the city with foundations, whose architect and builder is God” (Hebrews 11:10). Christological Trajectory Jesus entered our “Meshech and Kedar,” “tabernacling” (John 1:14) among fallen humanity. His resurrection secures the pilgrimage’s completion: peace (shalom) longed for in Psalm 120:7 is granted through the risen Prince of Peace (John 20:19). Practical and Devotional Implications 1. Evangelistic Outlook: Hostile surroundings are mission fields; as the psalmist sought peace, believers proclaim the gospel of reconciliation. 2. Behavioral Insight: Cultural displacement can foster spiritual dependence; cognitive studies reveal that minority faith contexts heighten scripturally grounded resilience and community cohesion. 3. Worship Orientation: Psalm 120 inaugurates ascent worship; corporate singing of this lament readies hearts for praise, mirroring the progression from Good Friday sorrow to Resurrection Sunday triumph. Summary Meshech and Kedar in Psalm 120:5 signify the pilgrim’s profound geographic, cultural, and moral alienation. Historically verifiable peoples at Israel’s polar edges, they serve as literary devices to express exile, typologically prefigure the church’s earthly sojourn, and point to the accomplished and future peace secured in Christ. |
    |