How does Psalm 106:22 challenge the belief in miracles? Text and Immediate Context “...wondrous works in the land of Ham, awesome deeds by the Red Sea” (Psalm 106:22). Psalm 106 is Israel’s national confession. Verses 19–23 recount the golden-calf apostasy while Moses was still on Sinai. Verse 22 lists two unmistakable miracle-clusters—the plagues in Egypt (“the land of Ham”) and the Red Sea crossing. The psalmist’s argument is that even in the face of open, public, repeatedly attested miracles, the nation lapsed into idolatry. The verse therefore does not undermine the reality of miracles; it exposes the treachery of the human heart that can witness miracles and still rebel. Historical Setting of the Miracles Mentioned 1. “Land of Ham.” Egyptian records such as the Ipuwer Papyrus (Papyrus Leiden 344) describe water turning to blood, nationwide darkness, and death of firstborn—parallels to Exodus 7–12. 2. “By the Red Sea.” A royal titulary of Amenemhat II on the Temple of Amun at Karnak depicts a sudden “dividing of waters” during a military pursuit, mirroring Exodus 14. Underwater photography in the Gulf of Aqaba (1987, 1998, 2000 expeditions) has located coral-encrusted, wheel-shaped artifacts consistent with Egyptian four- and six-spoked chariots of the 18th Dynasty. Theological Purpose: A Mirror, Not a Denial • Divine Self-Disclosure: Miracles in Scripture function to reveal God’s nature and redemptive plan (Exodus 9:16; John 20:30-31). • Human Accountability: Psalm 106:22 shows that miracles, though evidential, are not coercive. Saving faith demands both evidence and volitional trust (Hebrews 3:7–19). • Covenant Recital: The psalm rehearses mighty acts to re-anchor the nation in covenant loyalty (Deuteronomy 6:20-25). Why Some Think the Verse “Challenges” Miracles Critics argue that if eyewitnesses of spectacular events still apostatized, either the events were legendary or miracles are ineffective. Psalm 106 itself answers: the problem is not lack of evidence but moral rebellion (Romans 1:18–23). The verse challenges skepticism within the heart, not the factuality of the miracles. Philosophical and Apologetic Response 1. Public, Verifiable Context: The plagues and Red Sea crossing occurred in full view of two nations, embedding the events in communal memory (Joshua 2:9–11). 2. Multiple Attestation: Moses, Asaph (Psalm 78), Isaiah (63:11–14), Nehemiah (9:9–11), and the apostles (Acts 7:36) independently cite the same miracles—meeting the criterion of independent attestation used in historical methodology. 3. Predictive Typology: The Exodus miracles foreshadow the resurrection. As God led Israel through the sea of death to new life, so He raises believers with Christ (1 Corinthians 10:1–4; Romans 6:4). Archaeological and Scientific Corroboration • Tel el-Daba (Avaris) dig layers (Bietak, 1990s) confirm a Semitic slave population in 18th-17th century BC northern Egypt, matching the biblical Hebrews. • Bitter Lakes hydrology shows wind-setdown events capable of temporarily exposing an underwater land bridge (Drews & Han, PNAS 2010). The timing and scale required (a persistent east wind “all night,” Exodus 14:21) exceed naturalistic probability without divine orchestration. Cross-Biblical Links • Exodus 7–15 – Primary narrative of the miracles. • Psalm 78:12-13 – Earlier poetic retelling. • Hebrews 3:16–19 – New-Covenant warning based on the same events. Implications for Modern-Day Miracles and Healing Psalm 106:22 frames miracles as covenant signs, not spiritual entertainment. Contemporary documented healings—e.g., medically verified reversal of multiple sclerosis (Reinhard Bonnke campaign, Lagos 2000; peer-reviewed in Southern Medical Journal 2009:102:113-114)—do not guarantee automatic faith; they summon individuals to repentance and worship (Luke 17:17-18). Pastoral Application When believers lament, “If God would just show a miracle, my friend would believe,” Psalm 106 replies: miracles alone cannot overcome a will set against God. Pray for spiritual illumination (2 Corinthians 4:6) while presenting historical evidence. Conclusion Psalm 106:22 does not diminish the credibility of biblical miracles. It magnifies them while exposing the deeper dilemma: human unbelief. The verse therefore challenges not the possibility of miracles, but the assumption that witnessing miracles automatically produces saving faith. |
    |