Psalm 71:15 vs. modern divine justice?
How does Psalm 71:15 challenge modern views on divine justice?

Literary Setting within the Psalm

The psalm is a plea from advanced age (vv. 9, 18). Surrounded by enemies (vv. 10-11), the worshiper trusts that the God who acted righteously in the past will act again. Justice is not merely the final rectification of all things but a present, ongoing pattern of faithful deliverance.


Canonical Intertextuality

Psalm 36:6—“Your righteousness is like the highest mountains.”

Isaiah 45:21—“A righteous God and a Savior; there is none but Me.”

Romans 3:21-26—God is “just and the justifier.”

The biblical canon repeatedly fuses justice with salvation, culminating in the cross where wrath against sin and mercy toward sinners coincide (Isaiah 53:5-6; 2 Corinthians 5:21).


Divine Justice as Inseparable from Salvation

Modern views often caricature justice as retribution alone, prompting objections such as “Why must a loving God judge?” Psalm 71:15 insists that judging evil and rescuing from evil are two sides of one coin. A judge who never punishes is indifferent; a savior who never judges leaves evil unchecked. The psalmist proclaims acts that are simultaneously judicial and redemptive.


Transcendent Measure of Righteousness

The last clause—“though I cannot know their full measure”—admits epistemic limitation. Contemporary confidence in human moral autonomy is challenged; God’s rectifying acts exceed mathematical accounting (cf. Psalm 40:5). Divine justice cannot be confined to utilitarian calculus or social-contract theory; it is infinite and personal.


Challenge to Modern Minimalist Conceptions of Justice

1. Therapeutic Moralism: A culture that reduces wrongdoing to sickness seeks rehabilitation, not retribution. Psalm 71 reminds us that evil is culpable rebellion needing righteous redress.

2. Horizontal-Only Justice: Secular models focus on offender-victim-society, omitting the offended Creator. The psalmist addresses God first; vertical justice governs horizontal outcomes.

3. Finite Human Courts: Legal systems can misjudge. God’s acts are flawless and complete, inviting humble trust rather than suspicion (Psalm 119:142).


Implication for Soteriology and Christ’s Resurrection

The logical terminus of Psalm 71:15 is the cross and empty tomb. The resurrection certifies that God’s righteousness has been satisfied and His salvation secured (Acts 17:31; 1 Corinthians 15:17). Historical minimal facts—attested enemy attestation, early creed of 1 Corinthians 15:3-5, and multiple independent appearances—ground the claim in verifiable history, confirming that divine justice culminated in a historic, bodily event, not myth.


Confirmatory Evidences from History and Manuscripts

Psalm 71 appears intact in the Masoretic Text, Dead Sea Scroll 4QPs¹⁷ (ca. 50 BC), and the Codex Sinaiticus (4th cent. AD) with no substantive variants affecting the thrust of v. 15. The stability of the text undercuts arguments that biblical justice is a late theological “evolution.” Archaeological strata from Lachish Level III and the destruction layer of Jericho illustrate God’s judicial interventions in real time and space, aligning with the pattern the psalmist extols.


Practical and Pastoral Applications

1. Proclamation: Believers are called to verbalize God’s righteous salvations “all day long,” countering cultural narratives of divine indifference.

2. Assurance: In aging, opposition, or societal upheaval, God’s justice-salvation dynamic endures, anchoring hope beyond human schemes.

3. Ethical Imitation: Because justice and mercy unite in God, His people pursue both—opposing evil while offering reconciliation through the gospel.

Psalm 71:15 therefore confronts modern reductions of divine justice, presenting a God whose righteous acts are limitless salvations, verified in history, and heralded as the sure hope of every generation.

What historical context influenced the writing of Psalm 71:15?
Top of Page
Top of Page