How did Stephen perform "great wonders and signs" as described in Acts 6:8? The Verse in Context “Now Stephen, full of grace and power, was performing great wonders and signs among the people” (Acts 6:8). Luke places this statement after the appointment of the Seven (Acts 6:1-7), situating Stephen’s ministry in Jerusalem around AD 32-34—shortly after Pentecost and within a few years of the Resurrection. The Meaning of “Great Wonders and Signs” Greek τέρατα (“wonders”) highlights the awe provoked; σημεῖα (“signs”) stresses that the events point beyond themselves to divine truth. The adjective μεγάλα (“great”) intensifies both frequency and magnitude. Luke uses the same word pair for apostolic miracles (Acts 2:43; 5:12), placing Stephen on equal footing with the Twelve in evidentiary function. Source of Stephen’s Ability: “Full of Grace and Power” Grace (χάρις) indicates unmerited favor—God’s enabling presence—while power (δύναμις) points to the operational strength of the Holy Spirit (cf. Acts 1:8). Luke connects the Spirit with miraculous power repeatedly (Luke 4:14; Acts 10:38). Stephen’s signs are therefore God’s direct work through a yielded vessel, not a natural aptitude. The Holy Spirit’s Role Acts chronicles a post-Pentecost pattern: Spirit-filling → bold proclamation → confirming miracles. The Spirit’s indwelling (Ezekiel 36:27 fulfilled) equips believers for external works that validate internal transformation. Stephen models this sequence: chosen for being “full of the Spirit” (Acts 6:3,5), empowered to perform miracles, then delivering a Spirit-guided defense (Acts 7:55). Continuity with Old Testament Paradigms Stephen’s ministry parallels Moses (note his lengthy speech in Acts 7 emphasising Moses’ signs), Elijah, and Elisha. In each case God authenticated a pivotal messenger by visible wonders (Exodus 4:30; 1 Kings 18:37-39; 2 Kings 5:14-15). Luke’s deliberate Moses-Stephen linkage signals the same covenantal pattern now centered in Christ. Apostolic Commission and the Office of the Seven Although not an apostle, Stephen was installed by apostolic prayer and laying on of hands (Acts 6:6). Throughout Scripture this rite conveys authority and spiritual gifting (Numbers 27:18-23; 1 Timothy 4:14). Thus Stephen’s abilities derive from Christ’s delegated authority through the apostles, demonstrating that God’s power is not limited to a select class but extends to faithful servants. Function of Miracles in the Early Church a) Authentication of the gospel message (Hebrews 2:3-4). b) Compassionate relief of suffering, embodying Christ’s kingdom ethic (Matthew 11:5). c) Provocation of public attention leading to proclamation (Acts 3:9-12). Stephen’s miracles precipitate the synagogue debates (Acts 6:9-10) and ultimately his martyrdom, fulfilling Christ’s forecast of Spirit-empowered witness before opposition (Luke 21:12-15). Likely Types of Miracles Luke does not enumerate each act, but the surrounding narrative and parallel passages suggest: • Physical healings (cf. Acts 6:7 “multitudes were added” mirrored by healings in 5:15-16). • Deliverance from demonic oppression (pattern of 5:16). • Possibly nature-related signs (echoing Elijah/Elisha typology). Eyewitness memory would preserve spectacular events soon challenged by adversaries; the silent admission by opponents that they “could not stand up to his wisdom” (Acts 6:10) implies undeniable phenomena. Historical Corroboration of Early Christian Miracles a) Josephus records healings by invocation of Solomon’s name (Ant. 8.2.5), illustrating a first-century milieu open to supernatural claims. b) Quadratus (AD 125) wrote to Emperor Hadrian that some of those healed by Jesus and the apostles “survived even to our own day” (Eusebius, Hist. Ecclesiastes 4.3.2). c) Archaeological identification of the Pool of Bethesda and Siloam—sites of New Testament healings—underscores Luke’s geographical accuracy, reinforcing credibility for miracle narratives embedded in verifiable settings. Philosophical and Scientific Plausibility of Miracles Miracle claims rest on the Resurrection’s precedent; if Christ rose, lesser signs fall within the same causal envelope. Multiple independent lines—minimal-facts argument (1 Corinthians 15:3-8 creed, enemy attestation, empty tomb)—anchor the Resurrection historically, undercutting the a priori rejection of supernaturalism. Intelligent-design research demonstrates the insufficiency of undirected material causes in origin-of-life scenarios, leaving rational space for a transcendent causal agent who can, by definition, act into nature. Contemporary Analogues Documented healings, e.g., medically verified disappearance of metastasized cancer following prayer at Calvary Chapel (peer-reviewed case in Southern Medical Journal, 1981), echo Stephen’s signs and illustrate the Spirit’s ongoing ministry. Such cases, though not canonical, mirror New Testament patterns and lend empirical plausibility to Luke’s description. Theological Implications Stephen’s wonders: • Affirm the continuity of redemptive history from Creation to New Creation. • Demonstrate that ordinary believers, empowered by the Spirit, can bear extraordinary witness. • Provide tangible evidence that the kingdom of God has broken into history, validating the exclusivity of salvation in Christ (Acts 4:12). Application for the Modern Reader Believers are called to pursue the Spirit’s fullness (Ephesians 5:18), expecting God’s intervention while submitting outcomes to His sovereignty (1 Corinthians 12:11). Skeptics are invited to weigh firsthand testimony, manuscript reliability, archaeological confirmation, and ongoing accounts rather than defaulting to methodological naturalism. Conclusion Stephen performed “great wonders and signs” because the risen Christ, through the indwelling Holy Spirit, chose to authenticate the gospel beyond dispute. The textual fidelity of Acts, the congruence with Old Testament precedent, corroborative historical data, and enduring modern parallels converge to show that these events are neither myth nor metaphor but recorded history demonstrating God’s active revelation in the early church and His continued readiness to glorify His Son today. |
    |